General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney gives a shout out to the little people
by Laura Clawson
What better time than a high-dollar country club fundraiser to defend against charges of plutocracy and express sympathy for the little people? At just such a fundraiser in Mississippi, Mitt Romney tried to rebut the conclusion frequently drawn from the fact that Republican policy is dedicated to making the rich richer and cutting services for everyone who's not rich:
Really? What in Romney's record or policies suggests that? The giant tax cuts for people who are already rich on the backs of middle-class and poor people? The trail of companies that Bain bought, sucked millions in profits out of, and left bankrupt? But no, to be fair, it's true that there aren't enough rich people to win elections for the Republican Party, and Republicans do depend on people who are willing to be suckered into believing they will be rich someday and should therefore vote for rich-people policies.
Romney also showed his common touch:
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/17/1110418/-Mitt-Romney-speaks-of-concern-for-the-waiters-and-waitresses-at-his-country-club-fundraiser
Wow, the "waiters and waitresses" must have felt really special.
ananda
(28,858 posts)nt
Turbineguy
(37,322 posts)Did I say that? I meant untermenschen.
madaboutharry
(40,209 posts)Fkn A, Chris Mattews is so right that Romney sounds like Thurston Howell.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... who are being kept unemployed by your party for political gain.
They're also better off than the thousands laid off by YOUR COMPANY just to make you richer than you already were.
Go fuck yourself.
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)that is one twisted statement.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)denverbill
(11,489 posts)As in 'I want to help poor people, but I don't because helping them just reinforces their neediness.'
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)"I want to want to help them, but by gosh, somehow I just can't"
And how he cryptically says that he wants "want" to help to KEEP people from becoming poor. In my view that kind of leaves out existing "poor people" altogether.
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)the waiters would be. OMG. He lives in another world. Sad for us that he is the opposition's candidate. If he wins 99% of us are
screwed.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)The Horror.
I bet even thinking about being that poor gives Mitt the creeping terrors.
warrior1
(12,325 posts)he really doesn't get it.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)I BETCHA A DOLLAR they got crappy tips.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)"Were accused, by the way in our party of being the party of the rich," Romney said. "And its an awful moniker, because thats just not true. Were the party of people who want to get rich. And were also the party of people who want to care to help people from getting poor. We want to help the poor.
So he's saying, they "want to care", meaning they don't.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)With the current trajectory, the only employment left will be jobs servicing the rich.
VWolf
(3,944 posts)I'm sure they do
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)Swede
(33,236 posts)Oh,and fly my horse to Europe. Then I can care,maybe.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)"I can give 2 of them jobs as cabin boys on my new megayacht (my 8th!) that was bought with profits from outsourcing their companies. I can't pay them (fuel costs a lot these days!) but they'll get room & board. I'm such a compassionate conservative!"