Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
Thu Oct 5, 2017, 04:19 PM Oct 2017

This is a full auto weapon - and why the ATF didn't challenge bump fire stocks in the first place


The device shown in this picture is a full auto weapon:



Pulling the ring on the back will cause the action of the bolt to squeeze the trigger each time a new round is chambered.

As is chronicled here:



There are innumerable simple ways to cause any semi-automatic weapon to repeat the firing action in such a manner that successive manual trigger actions are not required.

I'm actually surprised the "Are you going to ban string" contingent did not march in the usual gun fancier parade behind the Girandoni rifle brigade this time.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is a full auto weapon - and why the ATF didn't challenge bump fire stocks in the first place (Original Post) jberryhill Oct 2017 OP
plus bump stocks can be 3D printed yodermon Oct 2017 #1
How dare you use facts and cite the law here! Lurks Often Oct 2017 #2
So they don't need to be banned, just illegal to use. jmg257 Oct 2017 #3
Seems to me, that the rate at which a gun can fire isn't really a problem. Captain Stern Oct 2017 #4
Agree Act_of_Reparation Oct 2017 #7
You can learn to "bump fire" almost any semi-auto rifle with no devices whatsoever. EL34x4 Oct 2017 #5
why do anything? maxsolomon Oct 2017 #6
Ban the weapon, not the gizmo that makes it faster samir.g Oct 2017 #8

Captain Stern

(2,201 posts)
4. Seems to me, that the rate at which a gun can fire isn't really a problem.
Thu Oct 5, 2017, 05:54 PM
Oct 2017

When it comes to mass shootings, it's the amount of bullets a gun can hold.

A gun that can fire at a rate of 1500 bullets per minute wouldn't really be all that big a deal if it could only hold 15 bullets at once.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
7. Agree
Thu Oct 5, 2017, 06:11 PM
Oct 2017

Full auto is used by the militaries of the world to suppress, to force enemies to keep their heads down so friendly forces can relocate without getting shot. It's terrifying, but not especially accurate.

It logically follows that time spent reloading is time spent not shooting, and time spent not shooting is invaluable to potential victims attempting to flee the scene of a mass shooting. I'd argue controlling high capacity magazines is much more important than fire rate, but it is unlikely we'll see any progress on that front in the immediate future.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
5. You can learn to "bump fire" almost any semi-auto rifle with no devices whatsoever.
Thu Oct 5, 2017, 06:05 PM
Oct 2017

It's all technique.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is a full auto weapo...