General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is a full auto weapon - and why the ATF didn't challenge bump fire stocks in the first place
The device shown in this picture is a full auto weapon:
Pulling the ring on the back will cause the action of the bolt to squeeze the trigger each time a new round is chambered.
As is chronicled here:
There are innumerable simple ways to cause any semi-automatic weapon to repeat the firing action in such a manner that successive manual trigger actions are not required.
I'm actually surprised the "Are you going to ban string" contingent did not march in the usual gun fancier parade behind the Girandoni rifle brigade this time.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)good luck banning that
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Interesting approach.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)When it comes to mass shootings, it's the amount of bullets a gun can hold.
A gun that can fire at a rate of 1500 bullets per minute wouldn't really be all that big a deal if it could only hold 15 bullets at once.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Full auto is used by the militaries of the world to suppress, to force enemies to keep their heads down so friendly forces can relocate without getting shot. It's terrifying, but not especially accurate.
It logically follows that time spent reloading is time spent not shooting, and time spent not shooting is invaluable to potential victims attempting to flee the scene of a mass shooting. I'd argue controlling high capacity magazines is much more important than fire rate, but it is unlikely we'll see any progress on that front in the immediate future.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)It's all technique.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)"this is the price of freedom" - bill o'reilly
samir.g
(835 posts)Then rednecks can have all the string they want.