Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTaxpayers pay legal bill to protect Trump business profits
Taxpayers pay legal bill to protect Trump business profits
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/11/15/taxpayers-pay-legal-bill-protect-trump-business-profits/848354001/
Taxpayers are footing the legal bill for at least 10 Justice Department lawyers and paralegals to work on lawsuits related to President Trump's private businesses.
Neither the White House nor the Justice Department will say how much it is costing taxpayers, but federal payroll records show the salaries of the government lawyers assigned to the cases range from about $133,000 to $185,000.
The government legal team is defending President Trump in four lawsuits stemming from his unusual decision not to divest himself from hundreds of his companies that are entangled with customers that include foreign governments and officials.
In the cases, Justice Department attorneys are not defending policy actions Trump took as president. Instead, the taxpayer-funded lawyers are making the case that it is not unconstitutional for the president's private companies to earn profits from foreign governments and officials while he's in office.
The government lawyers and Trump's private attorneys are making the same arguments that the Constitution's ban on a president taking gifts from foreign interests in exchange for official actions does not apply to foreign government customers buying things from Trump's companies. The plaintiffs, including ethics groups and competing businesses, argue the payments pose an unconstitutional conflict of interest.
The Justice Department for weeks refused to answer questions about how many employees were working on the cases and for how long, falsely saying the agency doesn't track such information. USA TODAY identified the government legal staff who are defending Trumps business profits using the agency's own internal case-tracking database, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
More on the link
.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 853 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taxpayers pay legal bill to protect Trump business profits (Original Post)
KelleyKramer
Nov 2017
OP
This is fucked up, mostly deplorable do this because they want a rise out of the left and want to ..
uponit7771
Nov 2017
#1
uponit7771
(90,346 posts)1. This is fucked up, mostly deplorable do this because they want a rise out of the left and want to ..
... a response to what they felt during the Obama years.
The brown person in office was a threat to them and they want revenge, this is a deep seated anger they have along with an unwillingness to say they're wrong (which most humans have) about the character of Red Don.
At some time we have to start associating Red Dons enablers and himself so they'll go underground like they did with W.
RainCaster
(10,880 posts)2. If we are paying for this, then we should have access to all his tax records for these businesses
If we are paying the bill, then we are the client. Full disclosure.
KelleyKramer
(8,969 posts)3. That's a VERY good point!
I wish some prominent Dems would point that out
sprinkleeninow
(20,249 posts)4. You got that right. n/t
KelleyKramer
(8,969 posts)5. ...