Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

malaise

(269,022 posts)
3. Yes that would make sense to folks who believe Climate Change is a liberal conspiracy
Thu Nov 16, 2017, 08:56 AM
Nov 2017

Extreme Harvey-Like Rains in Texas 6x More Likely Today Than 25 Years Ago
https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/extreme-harvey-rains-texas-6x-more-likely-today-25-years-ago
<snip>
Texas rainfall events as intense as that produced by Hurricane Harvey, which had about a 1 percent annual likelihood in the 1990s, had already increased in likelihood to about 6 percent annually in 2017, and by 2090 could be about 18 percent. That’s according to the paper "Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall", published on Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by Dr. Kerry Emanuel of MIT, who is widely regarded as the world’s leading hurricane expert.

Dr. Emanuel used a very high-resolution, specialized computational hurricane model embedded within six different state-of-the-art climate models to make his assessment. The model generated 3,700 predictions of hurricane tracks and rainfall amounts for the projected climate in at the end of the century, in the years 2081 - 2100. These predicted rainfall amounts were then compared to the rainfall amounts generated by the model for hurricanes simulated during the historical period 1979 – 2015. Using a storm-total amount of 20+ inches as his benchmark, Dr. Emanuel determined that in the old climate of the 1990s, some location in Texas could expect to see a hurricane dump that amount of rain once every 100 years (a 1% chance of occurrence in any particular year.) Looking specifically at Houston (not the entirety of Texas), he wrote: “Harvey’s rainfall in Houston was “biblical” in the sense that it likely occurred around once since the Old Testament was written”—meaning that Harvey’s rains were a 1-in-2000 year event at that specific location in Texas (a 0.05% chance of occurring in Houston in any particular year.)

His model showed that these odds had already shifted in the year 2017 to a 1-in-17 year event for Texas (and 1-in-325 year event for Houston.) By the end of the century (the years 2081 – 2100), the model showed the odds of a Harvey-like rainfall event continuing to increase, to a 1-in-6 year event for Texas and 1-in-100 year event for Houston. Dr. Emanuel did not attempt to ascertain the dominant reason why climate change could be causing this increase in odds of Harvey-like rains, but cited greater water vapor concentration, stronger upward motion in storms, longer duration of events, and greater frequency of events as possible contributors. Dr. Emanuel gives an interesting summary of the research in a 70-minute lecture presented at MIT in September 2017 (video here).
Harvey’s rains were the greatest ever recorded for any U.S. tropical cyclone

Hurricane Harvey was the second most expensive weather-related disaster in world history behind Hurricane Katrina (2005), with damages of $90 billion, said insurance broker Aon Benfield last week. Other insurance groups put the damages at $70 billion - $200 billion. Remarkably, the usual culprits in extreme hurricane damage—storm surge and destructive winds—were only of secondary importance for Harvey. The majority of the great hurricane’s damage occurred because the storm stalled in place and dumped truly prodigious rains in excess of fifty inches over one of the world’s largest metropolitan areas—Houston, Texas. The nearby Port-Arthur/Beaumont, Texas area received even more extreme rains—up to 60 inches. These rains washed away many all-time meteorological and hydrological records, not only for Texas, but for the entire United States. More than 6.7 million people in a 29,000 square mile area (the size of West Virginia) received at least 20 inches of rain in seven days, said NOAA’s Tom Di Liberto in an article at climate.gov, and an area larger than the state of Massachusetts received 30+ inches of rain. Several locations received more than 25 inches of rain in one day, including 26.03 inches on August 29 at the Beaumont-Port Arthur Airport; rainfall rates over 5 inches per hour were reported in some places.

The Genealogist

(4,723 posts)
6. But Pat Robberson says it is God punishing the country because gay people
Thu Nov 16, 2017, 09:01 AM
Nov 2017

I guess God is now working thru the illuminati because gays?

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
7. The Illuminati has the weather machine now?
Thu Nov 16, 2017, 11:24 AM
Nov 2017

I would have thought that a smart man like President Obama would KEEP the weather machine for himself!

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
9. This is scary
Thu Nov 16, 2017, 11:38 AM
Nov 2017
“This is the largest spiritual battle since the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ,” he added.


These people are just aching for another crusade, and they will stop at nothing to create a reason for one. It's the same with the Moore supporters. They want our government based on the 10 commandments. If this craziness ever reaches a tipping point, well, I'm sure Dotard will let his crazies do whatever they want.

Archae

(46,328 posts)
10. This wack job also claims "Gawd told him" that Obama "stole" the 2012 election.
Thu Nov 16, 2017, 01:18 PM
Nov 2017

Hit too often with a big family Bible...

Self-proclaimed “prophet” Mark Taylor claims that God told him that Barack Obama did not win re-election in 2012, but rather stole the election via voter fraud.

?t=13m
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mark Taylor: Illuminati-C...