General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere's the dilemma re Al Franken
There may be elements of truth or it may all be true.
But Franken can't use all available information about Luann Tweeden because it will immediately be labelled slut-shaming.
Even if you find information on Google that shows that Tweeden is less than modest, it may be irrelevant to the issue at hand.
I'm not defending either party but I am saying the old adage: There's his story, there's her story, and there's the Truth. (IOW, the color of Truth is gray.)
The dilemma is how can you logically prove a "negative", that you didn't do something, esp. if there were no other witnesses?
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)so there was at least one witness, most likely more if it was a rehearsal.
lame54
(35,291 posts)the media is showing the pic as proof that he groped her
in the pic he is not touching her - but they can't seem to see that
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)when ridiculing people who take advantage of these situations.
lame54
(35,291 posts)but not proof of a crime
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,116 posts)Kaleva
(36,307 posts)Franken wants and will get an Ethics Committee investigation. Moore, if elected, will then surely face the same thing and my guess is that he'll be expelled from the Senate.
A big rat trap is being set for Moore. Maybe not on purpose but that's what's will happen.
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)If youve got it, flaunt it.
Im more concerned about her political leanings which appear to be right wing. That raises some questions in my view.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)or we are hypocrites.
no_hypocrisy
(46,116 posts)valid evidence. The victim has the PRESUMPTION of credibility.
kcr
(15,317 posts)That's true for anything. It is true that when it comes to rape and sexual assault women haven't been believed, and there has been a huge push to change that. Distorting that into all women have to be believed no matter the validity of the claim actually plays into the hands of those wishing to maintain the status quo. They actually claim that's the argument as a scare tactic and it's disingenuous.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)You can't have it both ways.
kcr
(15,317 posts)Am I only a "She said" when I heard Trump say "Grab 'em by the pussy."? How about all the other 20 something odd women. How many of them are "she said?"
But yeah. I guess I'm trying to have it both ways. Whatever you say, loyalsister.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)He has denied the allegations. I believe his victims. All of them.
kcr
(15,317 posts)For another, there was at least one parent who testified to his behavior towards their child. If you're going to assert that we're not allowed to consider stuff like that when we're forming opinions and deciding whether there's equivalence or not? I'm going to just assume there's an agenda.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)My point is it's hypocritical to accept one story immediately and unconditionally while refusing to entertain the possibility that someone is being falsely accused out of partisanship. The abusive public smear jobs are at least as damaging as the acts themselves. The rest of us should be as respectful and dignified as Al Franken.
standingtall
(2,785 posts)makes a claim is being truthful. I will not go to that extreme. That would be ignoring the reality that people do sometimes make false allegations about things like these. The context has to be examined.
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)I respect women. I don't respect men who don't. And the fact that my own actions have given people a good reason to doubt that makes me feel ashamed.
But I want to say something else, too. Over the last few months, all of usincluding and especially men who respect womenhave been forced to take a good, hard look at our own actions and think (perhaps, shamefully, for the first time) about how those actions have affected women.
For instance, that picture. I don't know what was in my head when I took that picture, and it doesn't matter. There's no excuse. I look at it now and I feel disgusted with myself. It isn't funny. It's completely inappropriate. It's obvious how Leeann would feel violated by that picture. And, what's more, I can see how millions of other women would feel violated by itwomen who have had similar experiences in their own lives, women who fear having those experiences, women who look up to me, women who have counted on me.
Coming from the world of comedy, I've told and written a lot of jokes that I once thought were funny but later came to realize were just plain offensive. But the intentions behind my actions aren't the point at all. It's the impact these jokes had on others that matters. And I'm sorry it's taken me so long to come to terms with that.
While I don't remember the rehearsal for the skit as Leeann does, I understand why we need to listen to and believe womens experiences.
I am asking that an ethics investigation be undertaken, and I will gladly cooperate.
And the truth is, what people think of me in light of this is far less important than what people think of women who continue to come forward to tell their stories. They deserve to be heard, and believed. And they deserve to know that I am their ally and supporter. I have let them down and am committed to making it up to them.
I was going to highlight the important parts, but that left only a couple of words un-highlighted.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Al thought Tweeden was in on the joke in that photo. She now claims she wasn't.
How do you prove what someone else was thinking about something?
(edited to make clear I don't think everything in this was "miscommunication".
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)That's a matter of getting to the truth ,regardless whether ultimately it helps or hurts Franken.