General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChris Matthews is an asshole.
End of story. Who the hell is he to criticize Hillary's feelings that
the 2016 election was dirty?
comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)And yes he is an asshole.
madinmaryland
(64,933 posts)It pisses him off that he is a simple minded dolt compared to the Clintons.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)Botany
(70,504 posts)n/t
dhol82
(9,353 posts)But, she is still dead to me.
She cannot explain away her calumny.
Irish_Dem
(47,057 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)milestogo
(16,829 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,057 posts)He should have retired a long time ago.
Agree
Irish_Dem
(47,057 posts)dhol82
(9,353 posts)Either somebody at msnbc really likes him or he has one hell of a contract.
Not sure which it is but I do think his 15 minutes of fame are long over.
Irish_Dem
(47,057 posts)dhol82
(9,353 posts)Always a possibility.
JHB
(37,160 posts)I assume it's a hobby, because for as long as he's been doing it, if he has to keep doing it I guess he's really bad at managing money.
Irish_Dem
(47,057 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Yes, he"s an ass.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)Too little too late.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)The election was fraudulent in those states. Voter suppression played a big role. Had people been allowed to vote Hillary would have won.
Botany
(70,504 posts)The early vote made it all but impossible for Trump to win not unless
he got > 80% of all the election day vote but you had some predominately
African American areas vote heavy that day and don't tell me they voted
for Trump.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections
Putin was just "looking around"
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I will never really get over the 2016 election unless they get around to fully addressing the vote count. It is the single most obvious thing that anyone with a brain would expect beginning that night. As far as I'm concerned, it is the biggest, stinkiest, elephant in the room.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,056 posts)It happened in Florida in 2000, Ohio in 2004, and the entire damn country last year. I've been saying this since 2000...we need at least 2-3 election cycles with paper ballots. Not computers, or even cards read by computers. We need paper, markers, and bi-partisan, highly supervised vote counts, overseen by cameras, and possibly even an international team. We don't need the results 30 seconds after the polls close. We can wait. Democracy is worth it.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)The days he explodes into devil's advocate mode are just too annoying.
Brainstormy
(2,380 posts)he's a no talent, no brains hack. He spits. And he interrupts constantly. Can't stand him.
TomSlick
(11,098 posts)He won't let anyone complete a sentence. He has to be the most arrogant person on television.
Enoki33
(1,587 posts)Alpeduez21
(1,751 posts)I don't watch him anymore.
Maven
(10,533 posts)I put him in the same category as a Chuck Todd or a Brian Williams. Mediocre talking heads who regurgitate pre-packaged narratives about politics and have straight-white-male-privileged their way into prestige jobs they don't deserve.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)Joe and Mika, Bill Maher etc
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)He objected to Sec'y Clinton's description of the election as "illegitimate." He pushed Donna Brazile to say whether she agreed the election was "illegitimate." Brazile said she did agree. Matthews got all huffy, "that's what Trump was saying about Obama, 'he was illegitimate because he's from Kenya'". Brazile told him, "we can argue semantics or keep pushing to get to the bottom of this." They both agree Russian involvement was heavy but, Matthews questions if that involvement effected the vote tally. Brazile didn't say she believed the tally was effected, but she didn't deny it either; she just insisted "we have to get to the bottom of this investigation."
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,985 posts)He's never liked the Clintons
Blue Owl
(50,373 posts)PJMcK
(22,037 posts)question everything
(47,479 posts)I really would like to have the address of whoever is in charge on MSNBC to send him to pasture.
We really don't watch him much now. He used to have interesting guests but not more. Who would like to start talking and have him shouting and shutting you off?
And his shameless promotion of his book!
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)He's an equal opportunity irritant to his guests, interrupting both genders, important and not so important people. It's irritating, but that's his style.
I don't always agree with him, but he is outspoken and doesn't hold back in his opinions. He was the first one I heard to call out birtherism as "crazy." He had a birther on as a guest, and he interrupted him constantly, and finally said, "That's just crazy. Crazy talk."
Yeah, he doesn't seem to be crazy about Hillary Clinton. I don't recall how he feels about Bill.
kimbutgar
(21,148 posts)mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)Dummy me enjoyed him talking about RFK when the other 99% of the time hes an asshole.
shanny
(6,709 posts)slumcamper
(1,606 posts)He speaks to the increasingly finite muddled middle.
There was a (brief) time and place for such milquetoast and weasely commentary. He "had his day." But events have forced a palpable hardening of social, economic values and political ideologies which is rendering CM's brand of reporting obsolete.
Obama was possibly right when he proclaimed "there is no red America, or blue America..." While prescient--and in retrospect a plea--from my vantage that statement is as obsolete as CM's reporting.
The lines are drawn. The knives are sharpened and drawn. We are now in a battle for the soul of the nation and its future.