General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIMO, the DNC has to introduce a UBI plan or program if they
want to take the House back.
It's obvious that what we are selling is not being brought.
The middle class may not know why but they know that their kids are not going to get a job or a education unless that are in the top 10%.
UBI program does not need to be a baked and a complete program but be we have to introduce the concept and not let profection be failure of the process.
doc03
(35,338 posts)and wtf is it?
CK_John
(10,005 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)I didn't have a clue either.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)or 2020 using the Democrstic party we will remain out of power for the foreseeable future.
Not enough people have positive view of UBI.
Again this election will be idealists vs pragmatists.
We need to regain power before we try and sell ideas like UBI.
If you open your eyes you should be able to see what pushing extreme ideas gets us.
Nothing!
tblue37
(65,357 posts)wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)MichMan
(11,930 posts)Everyone breathing receives a monthly check from the Government. This is because many believe that automation will replace most jobs and huge numbers of people will be unemployed.
Some people believe it should go to those below a certain income level and others to everyone regardless of income. There is also a discussion on if it should replace current social spending like Unemployment, SNAP, HUD & EITC or should be in addition to those programs. Should it be enough to put people at the poverty line or sufficient enough to allow people a comfortable standard of living ?
Irish_Dem
(47,081 posts)Then everyone is free to do what their heart and soul desires.
Teach people to read, create art, etc.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)HeartachesNhangovers
(814 posts)who is going to drive the buses, work in grocery stores, restaurants or factories or chemical plants, provide social services, pump gas, install cable, etc, etc, etc?
Codeine
(25,586 posts)A comfortable living ensures that nobody does any damned thing.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)Hillary won the popular vote. Her plans were very effective I thought. We all know where Bernie was coming from.
We stand for many things:
Free college
$15 minimum wage
Women's right to choose
Universal affordable health care
Liberal justices
Unions
Effective public education K through 12
Peace abroad
Human rights
LGBTQ rights
Women's rights
Pathway to citizenship for immagrants
Diversirsity
Social welfare
Income equality
I could go on
Problem is we do not control the message
CK_John
(10,005 posts)and your kids have missed the future. You will need UBI.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)that is going to work or the economic consequences of it
Beside raising taxes on rich people
Irish_Dem
(47,081 posts)MichMan
(11,930 posts)The smart ones will learn how to design, program, build and repair automation instead of waiting for UBI to provide a comfortable lifestyle.
Irish_Dem
(47,081 posts)Doesn't seem right.
MichMan
(11,930 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,081 posts)It is possible for many jobs to be AI at some point in the future.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)moving to chase pretend jobs; it is not going to happen.
brooklynite
(94,571 posts)...it is targeted at the lowest income citizen. Not that they don't need it, but the average voter is not in that situation, and doesn't see these strategies addresseing their needs.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)own program would be SocSec be set to 40yrs and include medicare.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)draw a check. Your idea would need to tax the shit out of young people with jobs to support you
MichMan
(11,930 posts)Why wouldn't it make sense that you could pay into SS for 20 yrs and then draw on it for 40 ?
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Take your program and file to run for office on the issue.
When you lose the Democratic Primary get back with us.
doc03
(35,338 posts)work how you going to get anything out of them if they can quit and get a pay check? What about us retirees on a fixed income, how are we supposed to survive if a meal at McDonalds costs $10 and nobody is paying into SS and Medicare? That kind of idea would go over like a lead balloon.
Irish_Dem
(47,081 posts)And the idea of a guaranteed income is that everyone would be comfortable, old and young.
There are more than enough resources on this planet, if shared equitably, to provide for all.
We are used to only getting the crumbs the rich don't want.
bagelsforbreakfast
(1,427 posts)question several studies indicate they will - and work harder and smarter - check Prof. John Standing's youtube videos.
dawg
(10,624 posts)We will eventually need UBI. The day will come when robots and artificially intelligent software will complete most tasks more efficiently than humans are capable. Most "jobs" will then be obsolete, and we will be forced to tax the robot owners and re-distribute the income to everyone else so the economy can still function.
But voters can't wrap their heads around that concept right now. They would just see it as a handout to people too lazy to work.
For now, we need to focus our efforts on health care. It should be a right, not a privilege. And there is much we can do to expand access and affordability.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)If the scenario you describe plays then we may in the distant future need it.
But to suggest that the Democratic Party propose it now would be electoral suicide.
bagelsforbreakfast
(1,427 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Hope you are having a great Thanksgiving
dawg
(10,624 posts)I think we'll eventually get to that point, but not any time soon.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)"Obamacare" was reviled as the work of Lenin's ghost, think of how UBI would be treated. Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin and Kruschev and and and all rolled into one!
Irish_Dem
(47,081 posts)A society where health care and education are provided to all.
An educated society, peaceful, and where a UBI provides a decent life for everyone.
And most citizens contribute in some way to the society in which they live.
If humans do not evolve, they will not survive.
dawg
(10,624 posts)I like to imagine a world where all necessities are provided and people work for luxuries (and personal fulfillment). That's a pipe dream now, but with the right technological advances, there's no reason it couldn't be the reality of the future.
Irish_Dem
(47,081 posts)Yes, exactly, people work for extras beyond the guaranteed income.
Or take classes, or volunteer.
Also for personal fulfillment or societal good.
Arts, humanities, volunteer work.
For the advancement of self, others and society.
It is not a fancy, glitzy, over the top society.
But everything is quite nice, pretty and comfortable.
I agree, we have the ability to achieve this as a society.
Maybe it is not a pipe dream, maybe we are glimpsing the future.
Or maybe it is our home planet, and we got lost in the wrong galaxy.
Saviolo
(3,282 posts)Right now it's restricted to three communities in Ontario.
Some links about it. Here is an article from April, before the pilot started:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/what-is-basic-income-and-who-qualifies/article34795127/
Here is a recent development on these pilots:
http://basicincome.org/news/2017/11/canada-lindsay-ontario-delegates-pass-lindsay-declaration-basic-income/
Here is the Government of Ontario page about it:
https://www.ontario.ca/page/ontario-basic-income-pilot