Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 12:07 PM Jul 2012

We Either Have a Machine Gun Ban, or We Don't.

Last edited Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:07 PM - Edit history (1)

Those clever NRA types have made it necessary to ban "semi-automatic rifles"...



The above video shows how to convert a Semi-automatic to Full Auto WITH A RUBBER BAND!

Great Work Jerks...

(I now go back to my self-imposed "vacation&quot ...
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Either Have a Machine Gun Ban, or We Don't. (Original Post) Junkdrawer Jul 2012 OP
Actually, that may be illegal. aikoaiko Jul 2012 #1
A rubber band is probably illegal. Travis_0004 Jul 2012 #2
It is -- I called and ask obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #15
What gets me.... Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #23
That's problem with semi-autos. They're lethal enoughas is, but can be converted by "militia" types. Hoyt Jul 2012 #27
We either have a machine gun ban, or we don't. Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #3
Many will suggest we ban rubber bands. Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #5
When I was in basic training DiverDave Jul 2012 #6
If you were in the Service the weapon you were issued was very easy to convert Bandit Jul 2012 #22
I'm not going to call you a liar, Marinedem Jul 2012 #24
He did say it was very simple 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #28
From what I understand DiverDave Jul 2012 #34
We were given M14s... meaculpa2011 Jul 2012 #26
Needs more eyes, apparently.... Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #7
None of the various gimmicks that allow simulated automatic fire are consistent with AIMED fire slackmaster Jul 2012 #8
He got a pretty tight grouping... Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #9
With a low-recoil pistol caliber at 25 yards? That's chickenshit. slackmaster Jul 2012 #10
After the election, WHO EVER WINS, this issue will be addressed. Bipartisan. Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #11
When rubber band machine guns are outlawed... slackmaster Jul 2012 #12
You are aware Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #13
EXACTLY what I'm saying.... Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #16
Those tax stamps (not a license) Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #17
We already have that. It's called the National Firearms Act. It's been the law for 78 years. slackmaster Jul 2012 #18
None of that will happen. Politicians don't have that kind of attention span. hack89 Jul 2012 #14
The 1% (aside from gun manufacturers) and the vast majority of the 99% are scared. Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #19
Considering all those scared people responded by buying more guns hack89 Jul 2012 #20
I believe you're correct nt Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #21
Wrong forum... -..__... Jul 2012 #29
Well... Marinedem Jul 2012 #25
See Post #11. Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #30
Very well. Marinedem Jul 2012 #31
The NRA is lord-almighty - until the sleeping giants awake... Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #33
From a technical perspective, that's a bad idea. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #32

aikoaiko

(34,170 posts)
1. Actually, that may be illegal.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 12:54 PM
Jul 2012

Bump firing is legal, but when a device that involved energy (like a spring or in this case a rubber band) is involved it may not be legal (see Atkins stock for 10/22s). I'd have to look at this more to figure it out.





 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
2. A rubber band is probably illegal.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 01:32 PM
Jul 2012

I believe somebody requested an ATF approval letter asking if one could use a shoelace to bump fire, and the ATF stated that using a shoelace would be illegal, and even advised against possession of shoelaces. Its kind of funny how they rule sometime.

There are bumpstocks made that are ATF approved.

http://www.slidefire.com/downloads/BATFE.pdf

Personally I think bumpstocks are stupid, they waste ammo, and they don't make an active shooter more deadly. They make a gun much less accurate, and more likely to jam.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
23. What gets me....
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:57 AM
Jul 2012

The video posted is from 2008 and has 300,000 + hits - BEFORE I posted it here.

I found it with a GOOGLE for bump stocks. But for 4 years it sat (and still sits) on You Tube and no "responsible" gun advocate asked to have it taken down.

That's what I meant by "Ya did it to yourselves". Must WE always police you?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
27. That's problem with semi-autos. They're lethal enoughas is, but can be converted by "militia" types.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:20 AM
Jul 2012

Might as well recognize it and do something about it rather than obfuscating, delaying, repeating right wing talking points ad nauseam, etc.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
3. We either have a machine gun ban, or we don't.
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:46 PM
Jul 2012

The humble rubber band has erased the distinction between "semi-automatic" and "machine gun".

Response to Junkdrawer (Original post)

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
6. When I was in basic training
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 08:24 AM
Jul 2012

we were ordered NOT to tear apart the trigger housings on our M-16 rifles.
And of course we did.
And found out a simple way (without a rubber band, I havnt heard of that one)
I wont tell you what we could do, but it was pretty simple.

I would say it would take 20 minutes to fix it so it would go full on rock and roll.

I havnt bought one and dont plan on it.
But if I do, I might just fix er up.
( If needed for the rev)

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
22. If you were in the Service the weapon you were issued was very easy to convert
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:49 AM
Jul 2012

You just turned the selector switch...Military issued weapons are assault weapons, designed for combat..

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
24. I'm not going to call you a liar,
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:07 AM
Jul 2012

but I will say that I don't believe you.

The M-16 is a full auto, select fire firearm.

You didn't have to do anything to make it shoot "full on rock and roll. "

Except maybe flip the selector switch. You know. The thing that makes them go auto...

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
34. From what I understand
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:23 AM
Jul 2012

the ar-15 has the same sort of selector-
only it will NOT click over to 'auto"
If that IS the case ( and I was told it was)
Then to call me a liar is just stupid.
And also why would the D.I. be so adamant about it?

Um, I really was in the service...

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
7. Needs more eyes, apparently....
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 09:53 AM
Jul 2012

Still too many "You gun grabbers confuse semi and full auto just because the rifle LOOKS scary" posts.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
8. None of the various gimmicks that allow simulated automatic fire are consistent with AIMED fire
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 09:55 AM
Jul 2012

It's up to the BATFE to determine whether or not a particular invention qualifies as a "machinegun conversion kit," and on many occasions they have made that determination.

The law IS NOT BROKEN.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
10. With a low-recoil pistol caliber at 25 yards? That's chickenshit.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:00 AM
Jul 2012

What do you think the BATFE should do, Junkdrawer, ban rubber bands?

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
11. After the election, WHO EVER WINS, this issue will be addressed. Bipartisan.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:03 AM
Jul 2012

NO ONE wants machine guns back on the street.

Here's how it will go down: New manufacture will be stopped - that will take the big money push from the NRA.

Federal buy-back programs will be announced and existing owners will be given time to either obtain a special license or risk a federal felony.

 
13. You are aware
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:17 AM
Jul 2012

That you can buy honest to god automatic weapons legally today right? You can also buy 40mm grenade launchers and rounds for them, legally (they're classified as a destructive device). You have to jump through some legal hoops for both and both are expensive but they're perfectly legal to own.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
16. EXACTLY what I'm saying....
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:24 AM
Jul 2012

Those who need or can prove they are responsible will apply for a license that includes a special background check.

 
17. Those tax stamps (not a license)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:26 AM
Jul 2012

Are very restrictive and expensive to obtain. I understand the history behind why the were initially put into place and wouldn't support widening them to semi-automatic rifles.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
14. None of that will happen. Politicians don't have that kind of attention span.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:18 AM
Jul 2012

Besides, after the election all attention will be on the economy, taxes and budget cuts. There will be no oxygen for any other issue.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
19. The 1% (aside from gun manufacturers) and the vast majority of the 99% are scared.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:28 AM
Jul 2012

Betcha the legislation is written and a bipartisan consensus reached. Obama wouldn't have said what he said yesterday if it wasn't.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
20. Considering all those scared people responded by buying more guns
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 10:31 AM
Jul 2012

I would not be so sure.

They will tighten up background checks like they did after Va Tech and nothing more.

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
25. Well...
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:11 AM
Jul 2012

When someone figured out how to make crack, they didn't outlaw baking soda.

I love this line of "reasoning".

"Someone did something I don't like, so ban what they did it with for everyone! Prosecute the one guy in a legal gray area? Heavens no. Ban all the guns!"

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
31. Very well.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:39 AM
Jul 2012

NO ONE wants machine guns back on the street.

Where are there machine guns on the streets? Maybe a few some gang bangers have converted illegally here and there. legal machine guns have killed a grand total of 2 people in the past 30 years. One of the killers was a cop. But you already knew about the NFA and the Hughes amendment, didn't you?

Here's how it will go down: New manufacture will be stopped - that will take the big money push from the NRA.

LOL, no, it won't. Machine guns for private purchase have not been made since 1986. The largest sellers in America today are semiautomatic rifles. Surely you don't mean them? They are in everything from home defense, to hunting, to target shooting. Cops use them too. Sorry, but they aren't going anywhere.

Federal buy-back programs will be announced and existing owners will be given time to either obtain a special license or risk a federal felony.

Or not. Based on what, other than wishful thinking and pipe dreams? Sorry, you lost absolutely all credibility on that one.

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
32. From a technical perspective, that's a bad idea.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:43 AM
Jul 2012

With the AR-platform/design, sooner or later a round will fire on an semi-open chamber and he'll get an eyefull of brass. Probably wreck his rifle too. He's a dumbass and is flirting with Darwin.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We Either Have a Machine ...