Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 09:49 AM Mar 2015

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Obamacare 'death panel' challenge

Source: Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a new challenge to the Obamacare law that took aim at a bureaucratic board labeled by some Republicans as a "death panel" because it was designed to cut Medicare costs.

The high court left intact a ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that threw out the lawsuit.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/30/us-usa-court-obamacare-idUSKBN0MQ1EU20150330

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
10. Not as long as untold millions are available to spend on buying lawyers and politicians....and
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 12:47 PM
Mar 2015

taxpayers fund most of it.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. Great to hear
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 10:18 AM
Mar 2015

I just hope they don't overturn the subsidies in the other case. If that one gets rejected they are SOL.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
4. As long as Obama is President,
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 10:41 AM
Mar 2015

these clowns will be trying to un-do anything he accomplishes. Hell, the President could issue an executive order prohibiting the eating of cute puppies and the Republicans would quickly put forth the "Freedom to Consume Canines Act" or something similar.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
7. Well....
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 11:40 AM
Mar 2015

If Pukes and Baggers have their way, they and the insurance companies will be the equivalent.

world wide wally

(21,743 posts)
9. Isn't there some kind of a law against bringing frivolous lawsuits?
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 11:57 AM
Mar 2015

Maybe if they had to pay a fine for wasting everyone's time, they might think twice about this nonsensical political posturing bullshit

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
12. Should be some kind of law against frivilous political parties and media and frivolous billionaires.
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 12:49 PM
Mar 2015

Oh well, free speech I guess. But why is free speech so expensive?

Marthe48

(16,950 posts)
14. Only if you're in prison
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 10:09 PM
Mar 2015

or a victim of malpractice....if you are a jerk teabag or repug, you can do anything you want and like the town idiot of old, your anti-social actions are tolerated with a wink and a smile.

mucifer

(23,542 posts)
13. The part that did get cut was from the original bill was the
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 10:03 PM
Mar 2015

provision that encouraged doctors to discuss end of life choices with patients and their families.

So stupid.

Thanks sarah palin.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court reject...