Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,660 posts)
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 09:23 PM Sep 2015

Appeals court upholds injunction halting health mandate

Source: AP

By JIM SUHR

ST. LOUIS (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that President Barack Obama's health care law unjustly burdens religiously affiliated employers by forcing them to help provide insurance coverage for certain contraceptives, even though they can opt out of directly paying for it.

The ruling by a three-judge 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in St. Louis upheld lower court decisions that sided with plaintiffs who included three Christian colleges in Missouri, Michigan and Iowa.

The 25-page opinion conflicts with all other federal appellate courts, which have found in the U.S. government's favor.

As religiously affiliated entities, those colleges victorious with Thursday's ruling don't have to pay directly for their workers' birth control. Instead, they can seek an accommodation that requires their insurance providers to pay for it. But the groups still say the scheme makes them complicit in the providing of contraception and subjected them to possible fines for noncompliance.

Circuit Judge Roger Wollman, writing the ruling on the panel's behalf, wrote that the contraceptive mandate and accommodation process of the Affordable Care Act substantially burdens the plaintiffs' exercise of religion.

FULL story at link.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8046f1811486456196d3221dc88ef7e8/appeals-court-upholds-injunction-halting-health-mandate

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court upholds injunction halting health mandate (Original Post) Omaha Steve Sep 2015 OP
That's not going to hold up. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #1
Sure hope you are right. This judge is behaving exactly the way Ronald Reagan would want. Judi Lynn Sep 2015 #6
Right. They shopped for a judge. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #7
Nope. Other courts have found the burden less and the responsibility bearable. Ford_Prefect Sep 2015 #2
Just kick it up to the SCOTUS so they can bat it down davidpdx Sep 2015 #3
This ruling is ridiculous. Adrahil Sep 2015 #4
If people on their payroll are found to be gambling or playing the stock market... graegoyle Sep 2015 #5

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
6. Sure hope you are right. This judge is behaving exactly the way Ronald Reagan would want.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:10 AM
Sep 2015

[center][/center]
Wikipedia:

. . .

Nomination to the Eighth Circuit[edit]

Wollman was nominated by President Ronald Reagan on June 25, 1985, to a new seat created by statute. Wollman was confirmed by the Senate on July 19, 1985, and he received his commission on July 22, 1985. From 1999 to 2002, Wollman served as chief judge for the Eighth Circuit.

Judge Wollman maintains his chambers in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Leland_Wollman

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. Just kick it up to the SCOTUS so they can bat it down
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 03:14 AM
Sep 2015

The whole "you can't do it because it tramples on my religious freedoms" bullshit is getting old.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
4. This ruling is ridiculous.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 06:48 AM
Sep 2015

How in the FUCK does it violate religious liberty to require an opt out? This ruling seems to imply that it's perfectly legit for such employers to impose their religipus doctrine on their employees.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court upholds inj...