Appeals court upholds injunction halting health mandate
Source: AP
By JIM SUHR
ST. LOUIS (AP) A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that President Barack Obama's health care law unjustly burdens religiously affiliated employers by forcing them to help provide insurance coverage for certain contraceptives, even though they can opt out of directly paying for it.
The ruling by a three-judge 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in St. Louis upheld lower court decisions that sided with plaintiffs who included three Christian colleges in Missouri, Michigan and Iowa.
The 25-page opinion conflicts with all other federal appellate courts, which have found in the U.S. government's favor.
As religiously affiliated entities, those colleges victorious with Thursday's ruling don't have to pay directly for their workers' birth control. Instead, they can seek an accommodation that requires their insurance providers to pay for it. But the groups still say the scheme makes them complicit in the providing of contraception and subjected them to possible fines for noncompliance.
Circuit Judge Roger Wollman, writing the ruling on the panel's behalf, wrote that the contraceptive mandate and accommodation process of the Affordable Care Act substantially burdens the plaintiffs' exercise of religion.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8046f1811486456196d3221dc88ef7e8/appeals-court-upholds-injunction-halting-health-mandate
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)[center][/center]
Wikipedia:
. . .
Nomination to the Eighth Circuit[edit]
Wollman was nominated by President Ronald Reagan on June 25, 1985, to a new seat created by statute. Wollman was confirmed by the Senate on July 19, 1985, and he received his commission on July 22, 1985. From 1999 to 2002, Wollman served as chief judge for the Eighth Circuit.
Judge Wollman maintains his chambers in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Leland_Wollman
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The whole "you can't do it because it tramples on my religious freedoms" bullshit is getting old.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)How in the FUCK does it violate religious liberty to require an opt out? This ruling seems to imply that it's perfectly legit for such employers to impose their religipus doctrine on their employees.
graegoyle
(532 posts)...will they fire them?