Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,741 posts)
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:00 PM Oct 2015

John Bel Edwards, David Vitter advance to runoff in governor's race (UPDATED)

Last edited Sun Oct 25, 2015, 08:47 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: NOLA

Andrew Boyd

Democratic state Rep. John Bel Edwards and Republican U.S. Sen. David Vitter will continue their heated battle for governor in a Nov. 21 runoff after finishing 1-2 in the primary election Saturday.

The Edwards-Vitter pairing was no surprise. Edwards was all but guaranteed 30 percent of the vote as the only major Democrat running; he ended up with 40 percent. Vitter was the candidate of choice for conservative Republicans, but was a distant second with 23 percent.

In the end, the two other Republicans in the race -- Public Service Commissioner Scott Angelle and Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne -- couldn't piece together coalitions big enough to overcome Vitter's conservative appeal. Vitter may be popular with his "super Republican" base, but polling shows he has "high negatives" among other groups of voters.

And it is obvious that Edwards and Vitter will be going hard after each other in the runoff. In his victory speech, Edwards referred to Vitter as Nixonian and just another version of Bobby Jindal. Vitter said electing Edwards would be like electing Barack Obama as governor of Louisiana.

FULL story at link.


John Bel Edwards, left, and David Vitter, right, will face each other in a runoff election for governor next month. (NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune photos by Ted Jackson, left, and David Grunfeld, right)

Read more: http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/10/louisiana_governor_victory.html



Sorry I forgot to update this sooner.
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Bel Edwards, David Vitter advance to runoff in governor's race (UPDATED) (Original Post) Omaha Steve Oct 2015 OP
Thanks Steve ! obnoxiousdrunk Oct 2015 #1
few things would be finer DonCoquixote Oct 2015 #2
Bobby Jindal is not in the race; David Vitter is, though... IphengeniaBlumgarten Oct 2015 #3
Don't be too hard on Vitter Yavin4 Oct 2015 #5
it probally would gave been better Robbins Oct 2015 #6
Didn't Vitter pull it off? I thought I saw the runoff was Edwards v. Vitter -- no? Attorney in Texas Oct 2015 #16
Yes you did. former9thward Oct 2015 #18
Our only chance though, is if Vitter takes the next spot. RandySF Oct 2015 #4
Yes, with about 3/4 of precincts reporting, looks like Vitter in second position. nt IphengeniaBlumgarten Oct 2015 #7
This sounds exciting. Jack Rabbit Oct 2015 #8
Here are the Sec. of State's not-yet-official results: pacalo Oct 2015 #9
so it mat be edwards vs Vitter Robbins Oct 2015 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author pacalo Oct 2015 #11
There's going to be a run-off between the two (update added below)... pacalo Oct 2015 #12
it's good news Robbins Oct 2015 #13
It's a lot better than I had expected. pacalo Oct 2015 #14
Yep Robbins Oct 2015 #15
It sure is! Those who live in red states would know what a feat that is. pacalo Oct 2015 #17
Probably why the Democrats hide theirs. former9thward Oct 2015 #19
No, I can understand why a Democrat would hide theirs in a red state pacalo Oct 2015 #20
Where I live both parties hide their identification. former9thward Oct 2015 #24
These elections seem to be a bit different. BlueMTexpat Oct 2015 #21
Here is John Bel Edwards web site: Stuart G Oct 2015 #22
Not so good SansACause Oct 2015 #23
Bell is a pro gun, antiabortion Democrat TexasBushwhacker Oct 2015 #25
Not necessarily Roy Rolling Oct 2015 #27
I was hoping that some of the new dems down there could pull it out LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #26
We are in New Orleans for anniversary marlakay Oct 2015 #28
Who wouldn't want Diaper Boy as governor? 6000eliot Oct 2015 #29
3. Bobby Jindal is not in the race; David Vitter is, though...
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:08 PM
Oct 2015

Vitter was supposed to waltz into the governorship, but he has been dodging questions, failing to show up for debates, plenty of bad publicity about his Serious Sins.

Two highest candidates will be in a runoff. John Bel Edwards and Scott Angelle the way it looks right now.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
6. it probally would gave been better
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:27 PM
Oct 2015

if Edwards was running against Vitter in runoff but vitter losing is great news.

If edwards could win runoff it would be good signal going into 2016 for democrats.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
8. This sounds exciting.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:32 PM
Oct 2015

OK, he's got to be better than Jindal or Vitter.

So what? How much better is he than Mary Landrieu?

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
9. Here are the Sec. of State's not-yet-official results:
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:37 PM
Oct 2015

Beryl Billiot (N) 0.52% 4327
"Jay" Dardenne (R) 14.74% 121469
Cary Deaton (D) 1.06% 8724
John Bel Edwards (D) 37.83% 311822
Jeremy "JW" Odom (N) 0.45% 3684
Eric Paul Orgeron (O) 0.21% 1696
S L Simpson (D) 0.68% 5630
David Vitter (R) 23.37% 192623

Response to Robbins (Reply #10)

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
12. There's going to be a run-off between the two (update added below)...
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:57 PM
Oct 2015

Last edited Sun Oct 25, 2015, 01:26 AM - Edit history (1)

I'll post the results when they are official.


http://staticresults.sos.la.gov/10242015/10242015_Statewide.html


The final results:

Scott A. Angelle (R) 19.30% 214907
Beryl Billiot (N) 0.51% 5690
"Jay" Dardenne (R) 14.96% 166553
Cary Deaton (D) 1.06% 11750
John Bel Edwards (D) 39.88% 444061
Jeremy "JW" Odom (N) 0.43% 4755
Eric Paul Orgeron (O) 0.20% 2244
S L Simpson (D) 0.67% 7411
David Vitter (R) 23.00% 256105

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
13. it's good news
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:01 PM
Oct 2015

that the Democrat made into runoff election.With LA system it could have been 2 republicans In run-off but the dem is doing
pretty well.

There was time when people thought vitter would win easily.at least he will be drawn into runoff.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
14. It's a lot better than I had expected.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:07 PM
Oct 2015

Edwards is 16% ahead of Vitter, with 3665 of 3945 precincts having been reported.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
15. Yep
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:12 PM
Oct 2015

while there are other republicans running edwards being ahead of vitter in jungle primary is good news.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
17. It sure is! Those who live in red states would know what a feat that is.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:19 PM
Oct 2015

But, you know, for such a red state, I wonder why Republicans don't make their affiliations known on their tv/printed ads. Why hide it?

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
20. No, I can understand why a Democrat would hide theirs in a red state
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 01:23 AM
Oct 2015

when asking voters for their support, but Republicans hiding theirs makes no sense. It tends to make me wonder why.

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
24. Where I live both parties hide their identification.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 06:11 PM
Oct 2015

Maybe because Indies are the number one "party". Both parties are losing support. They don't really stand for anything. The only reason we still have D vs. R elections is that the parties have conspired with each other to make it next to impossible for Indies and third parties to effectively get on the ballot while the D and R presence is mandated by law.

BlueMTexpat

(15,373 posts)
21. These elections seem to be a bit different.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 08:47 AM
Oct 2015

Louisiana has a "jungle" primary - the first time I have heard of such - for this election. All candidates, regardless of party affiliation appear on the same ballot. If no one candidate receives a majority, there is a runoff between the top two vote-getters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_gubernatorial_election,_2015

Hope that Edwards can pull this off! The fact that Louisianans STILL vote for Diaper Dave at all gives one pause, however.

SansACause

(520 posts)
23. Not so good
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:20 PM
Oct 2015

He got 40%. The other 60% went to Republicans. The way the South is, all those voting R will vote for Vitter if they come out. The hope is for low Republican turnout, but that almost never happens.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,219 posts)
25. Bell is a pro gun, antiabortion Democrat
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 06:26 PM
Oct 2015

Can he get a third of the votes cast for the other 2 Republicans? Maybe, but it's going to be tough.

Roy Rolling

(6,940 posts)
27. Not necessarily
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 08:38 PM
Oct 2015

Vitter beat up his Republican opponents mercilessly with millions spent I negative PAC ads. Dardenne and Angelle supporters hate Vitter and will not vote for him.

Overheard at the Vitter camp: "If I'd have known I needed endorsements I'd have been more respectful to those other two Republican assholes."

LiberalArkie

(15,729 posts)
26. I was hoping that some of the new dems down there could pull it out
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 06:49 PM
Oct 2015

only incumbent D's were in the runoffs. Even if Edwards pulls it out in Nov Louisiana is still very RED, There did not seem to be any movement at all on the few "Semi progressive" items on the ballot.

marlakay

(11,498 posts)
28. We are in New Orleans for anniversary
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 09:28 PM
Oct 2015

Signs for John Edwards all over and young teens out yesterday with signs reminding people to vote.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»John Bel Edwards, David V...