Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,037 posts)
Fri May 18, 2012, 11:35 PM May 2012

(Trayvon) Martin Spoke of ‘Crazy and Creepy’ Man Following Him, Friend Says

Source: NY Times

A girl who talked on the phone with Trayvon Martin on the night of Feb. 26 has told a state prosecutor that she heard rising fear in Mr. Martin’s voice that peaked with words like “get off, get off,” right before she lost contact with him and he was shot to death.

In the sworn interview recorded on April 2, which runs more than 22 minutes, the unidentified 16-year-old said Mr. Martin described a man who was “crazy and creepy” and on the phone, watching him from a vehicle before he started to follow him on foot.

The girl implored Mr. Martin, 17, who said he put his sweatshirt hood up because of the rain, to run to the town house where he was staying with his father, his father’s girlfriend and her 14-year-old son.

“I could hear the wind blowing” and “he said he lost him,” said the girl, who is from Miami and who said she had known Mr. Martin since kindergarten. She has not been identified because she is a minor and a witness in the case.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/us/trayvon-martins-friend-tells-what-she-heard-on-phone.html



Article includes audio of the interview.
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Trayvon) Martin Spoke of ‘Crazy and Creepy’ Man Following Him, Friend Says (Original Post) alp227 May 2012 OP
Sure seems like Trayvon was hunted down by that bully FailureToCommunicate May 2012 #1
It seems to me Zimmy's injuries were caused by a kid trying to defend himself against an aggressor Suji to Seoul May 2012 #2
It's not alleged that Zimmerman killed an unarmed kid. intheflow May 2012 #4
then he's guilty. unarmed kid. . .shot. could have ran home. could have listened to the 9/11 Suji to Seoul May 2012 #12
Police shoot unarmed people every day. Trayvon being unarmed is legally irrelevant. slackmaster May 2012 #16
bad example. in this badge sniffing country, cops are infallible Suji to Seoul May 2012 #17
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #22
I'm not a Zimmerman defender. intheflow May 2012 #21
i never said you were a zimmy defender. i use the world alleged because of legalistic mumbo-jumbo Suji to Seoul May 2012 #32
This definitely helps the prosecution's case, Vattel May 2012 #3
Oh YOU get off it. Nine May 2012 #6
I don't know if Zimmerman is guilty and neither do you. Vattel May 2012 #8
Not even a debate relayerbob May 2012 #18
You need to learn a little more about the relevant law. Vattel May 2012 #26
Wouldn't it be considered heresay evidence OnlinePoker May 2012 #24
It is allowed for two reasons: antigone382 May 2012 #30
this testiomony shows Trayvon was scared Enrique May 2012 #10
It proves that Iliyah May 2012 #5
That is the most important point, imo. Trayvon had a right to self defense. yardwork May 2012 #14
HE had the right to self-defense because Zimmerman was the aggressor. alarimer May 2012 #23
The prosecuion should get a large poster of the creepy black & white photo of Zimmerman... nenagh May 2012 #7
From Trayvon's perspective he was being followed and harrased by a nut who eventually Cass May 2012 #9
I wonder Blandocyte May 2012 #28
Cell phone records are very accurate... trumad May 2012 #11
I agree. But why did the police not check the cell phone records immediately? A Brand New World May 2012 #13
Maybe they did relayerbob May 2012 #19
So--is this phone call recoverable? What the hell do we have all the listening devices for, Nay May 2012 #15
I'm wondering how much of the girl's testimony about the phone call will get in at trial. amandabeech May 2012 #20
My understanding is that if the person quoted is dead, it is permissible. antigone382 May 2012 #31
So sad. That poor kid. The confusion and fear he must have been feeling is painful to think about FedUpWithIt All May 2012 #25
omg BlancheSplanchnik May 2012 #27
...And the MSM's false narratives dissolve before our eyes slackmaster May 2012 #29
 

Suji to Seoul

(2,035 posts)
2. It seems to me Zimmy's injuries were caused by a kid trying to defend himself against an aggressor
Sat May 19, 2012, 12:06 AM
May 2012

And when Zimmy started to lose (face), he pulled out his gun and shot the kid.

2nd degree murder is the correct crime here! Convict his ass. He killed an unarmed kid (allegedly).

intheflow

(28,481 posts)
4. It's not alleged that Zimmerman killed an unarmed kid.
Sat May 19, 2012, 12:23 AM
May 2012

No one disputes that Zimmerman shot the kid. Treyvon is dead by George Zimmerman's gun, and even Zimmerman admits he shot him. The arguments are over Zimmerman's motivation and intensions.

 

Suji to Seoul

(2,035 posts)
12. then he's guilty. unarmed kid. . .shot. could have ran home. could have listened to the 9/11
Sat May 19, 2012, 08:54 AM
May 2012

operator.

no, decided to be vigilante with a hard on.

The right wing believes two things about courts:
1) the courts are to decide innocence or guilty. Zimmy admits killing him. That sounds like guilt to me.
2) there are no mitigating circumstances, only aggravating ones.

Ship his racist ass to prison.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
16. Police shoot unarmed people every day. Trayvon being unarmed is legally irrelevant.
Sat May 19, 2012, 10:56 AM
May 2012

What will matter in the trial, if there is one, is what each party DID.

 

Suji to Seoul

(2,035 posts)
17. bad example. in this badge sniffing country, cops are infallible
Sat May 19, 2012, 11:04 AM
May 2012

and perfect. if they shoot someone, they have the power of the government to prove it was justified and an acceptable use of force.

where zimmy will get away with it is in the fact his victim is black and a boy.

everything else is irrelevant, even my previous statements.

Response to slackmaster (Reply #16)

intheflow

(28,481 posts)
21. I'm not a Zimmerman defender.
Sat May 19, 2012, 02:28 PM
May 2012

Your post said Zimmerman was alleged to have shot Martin. I responded there was no allegation about it. He's guilty of shooting martin, all agree. What's not agreed upon by some is Zimmerman's rights to shoot the kid down. Geesh. I'm on your side. Reading comprehension is a beautiful thing.


 

Suji to Seoul

(2,035 posts)
32. i never said you were a zimmy defender. i use the world alleged because of legalistic mumbo-jumbo
Sat May 19, 2012, 10:29 PM
May 2012

the prick is guilty as sin.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
3. This definitely helps the prosecution's case,
Sat May 19, 2012, 12:11 AM
May 2012

although if she can only testify that she heard Martin use "words LIKE 'get off, get off'", then the defense will emphasize that she admits that she doesn't know if Martin actually said "get off."

Nine

(1,741 posts)
6. Oh YOU get off it.
Sat May 19, 2012, 01:37 AM
May 2012

This is the current tactic I see. "Oh I personally think Zimmerman is guilty but, oh dear, this isn't very good for the prosecution's case, and the defense will unfortunately be able to argue this..."

relayerbob

(6,545 posts)
18. Not even a debate
Sat May 19, 2012, 12:36 PM
May 2012

Martin "stood his ground" when being stalked by an unknown vigilante assailant who was ignoring the orders of the police. The assailant then shot him by his own admission. Second degree murder at best.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
26. You need to learn a little more about the relevant law.
Sat May 19, 2012, 08:07 PM
May 2012

And by the way, the police did not order Zimmerman to do anything.

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
30. It is allowed for two reasons:
Sat May 19, 2012, 09:25 PM
May 2012

1.She was an actual witness (albeit via phone) to the events as they occurred.
2. The person she is quoting is dead, meaning there is no way to know what he said or thought other than relying on hearsay.

I also believe that anything she alleges Zimmerman said will be admissible as well, because as I recall there is no hearsay rule for statements made by the defendant, but I could be wrong about that.

Technically, I could be wrong about any of it; most of my "legal knowledge" in cases like these came from a year of doing mock trial in high school over ten years ago. As I recall these were pretty basic and well-established rules, but I defer to those who know more than me.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
10. this testiomony shows Trayvon was scared
Sat May 19, 2012, 08:28 AM
May 2012

whether he said "get off" doesn't seem to me to matter.

yardwork

(61,670 posts)
14. That is the most important point, imo. Trayvon had a right to self defense.
Sat May 19, 2012, 10:22 AM
May 2012

It doesn't matter if Zimmerman had a few scrapes and cuts. He shot and killed somebody. Any reasonable person would expect his victim to have tried to defend himself. Zimmerman was the one with the gun. His defenders want us to believe that Zimmerman was in fear of his life. The man with the gun?

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
23. HE had the right to self-defense because Zimmerman was the aggressor.
Sat May 19, 2012, 05:28 PM
May 2012

Not the other way around, no matter what Zimmerman claims. His "injuries" are suspicious to me.

nenagh

(1,925 posts)
7. The prosecuion should get a large poster of the creepy black & white photo of Zimmerman...
Sat May 19, 2012, 05:09 AM
May 2012

taken at the crime scene..

Zimmerman looked crazy and creepy that night in the rain...

Cass

(2,600 posts)
9. From Trayvon's perspective he was being followed and harrased by a nut who eventually
Sat May 19, 2012, 05:42 AM
May 2012

physically confronted him. I still think it was Trayvon who had the right to invoke the SYG law.

Zimmerman should have followed the instructions from the police dispatcher to back off, but he chose not to.

Blandocyte

(1,231 posts)
28. I wonder
Sat May 19, 2012, 08:37 PM
May 2012

Did Zimmerman "physically" confront or just ask a question such as, "who are you and what are you doing here?" Maybe Trayvon began the physical confrontation. If so, what might that mean for the case?

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
11. Cell phone records are very accurate...
Sat May 19, 2012, 08:41 AM
May 2012

They will nail that time down perfectly.

This is damning evidence.

A Brand New World

(1,119 posts)
13. I agree. But why did the police not check the cell phone records immediately?
Sat May 19, 2012, 10:18 AM
May 2012

Why did the Dad have to play investigator & discover the call much later when he was looking at the bill? What a poor job of investigating this police department has done! I know you don't know the answer to these questions. Just commenting.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
15. So--is this phone call recoverable? What the hell do we have all the listening devices for,
Sat May 19, 2012, 10:53 AM
May 2012

if not to recover phone calls like this? Is there no way to recover the actual phone call and listen to it?

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
20. I'm wondering how much of the girl's testimony about the phone call will get in at trial.
Sat May 19, 2012, 01:06 PM
May 2012

The girl will testify about what Trayvon said. However, her account of what T. said is second hand, and thus may be subject, at least in part to the hearsay rule.

If the hearsay rule applies, then the testimony will not be heard by the jurors, unless is falls into an exception, like "excited utterances".

Any currently practicing trial lawyers around to clarify this?

I don't practice any more and my memory may not be sharp on these points.

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
31. My understanding is that if the person quoted is dead, it is permissible.
Sat May 19, 2012, 09:28 PM
May 2012

Also, if she actually heard the encounter leading up to the shooting, she is technically a witness to the events, and I would imagine her testimony would be critical.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Trayvon) Martin Spoke of...