Thousands of Mormons Plan to Abandon the Faith This Weekend
Source: The Advocate
A Utah attorney is planning to help thousands of Mormons formally leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, after LDS leaders announced a new policy barring children of LGBT people from baptism until they are 18.
Attorney Mark Naugle told Salt Lake City TV station KIVI that he has already heard from an estimated 1,400 people who would like his help filing formal letters of resignation, which are required to officially cut ties with the Mormon Church and remove one's name from the church rolls that list all members worldwide.
Naugle will also attend a demonstration Saturday afternoon that organizers are billing as a "Mass Resignation from Mormonism Event."
At press time, 995 people indicated that they planned to attend the event held at City Creek Park in Salt Lake City, according to the event's Facebook page. Noting that the event is "for anyone ready to resign from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and those who wish to support them," demonstrators plan to gather at the park to finalize and sign paperwork, then march en masse to Salt Lake's Temple Square to deposit the letters in a mailbox near the Church's international headquarters.
Read more: http://www.advocate.com/religion/2015/11/11/watch-thousands-mormons-plan-abandon-faith-weekend
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)gonna be handy to know when the little bastards knock on my door.
edgineered
(2,101 posts)Glad you're here. I've been waiting for your church to change it's policy.
Once they think your apostate butt has been excommunicated they never return.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and its followers are trained from birth to be good followers. For instance, they are not allowed to associate with anyone who becomes apostate, including their own children, a dreadful thing to happen to those cast out too, who lose all their family, friends, and social structure at once. Regarding this new change, their obedience need not have anything at all to do with bigotry, but with living their lives according to "god's" will.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)isn't God but only a god.
See if God made us he made my brother and sister-in-law gay and he/she doesn't make mistakes so I am told
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I'm just saying a lot of people are doing their best to obey their gods' instructions. It's not always about bigotry. Some people are true believers. Not fakes but the real thing. Shopping a god more in tune with urban crowd-think is not an option. When their god tells people to disapprove of LGBT, that's what they do. Fortunately, many are glad that rocks are not required and just cutting them from their party lists is adequate.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)to use my own mind. I wish more people would think like Kant
What Is Enlightenment?
Immanuel Kant
Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment.
Much more:
http://www.columbia.edu/acis/ets/CCREAD/etscc/kant.html
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)wanted to be, I can't be. For me religious tolerance does not require respecting people's beliefs, but rather respecting the importance of and commitment to religion for sincerely devout practitioners.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)We come from the same background but went in opposite directions. I don't know why he believes what he does but to me he believes in a superstition. Of course I don't say that to him.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)religion and even did a few years as a Jehovah's Witness at one time. We can't talk about anything deeper than our hobbies, and when I do get indications of how she thinks I'm usually more sorry than otherwise.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)salesmen in white shirts.
I would rather have a KKK grand wizard on my porch. At least they are honest about what they do.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)people better and bad people worse. Too simplistic, of course, but there's real truth in that. We had lots of Mormons in our neighborhood back in California, and some of them were fine, highly principled people who were raising happy children in very good homes. Others were not so fine, but the strong structure provided by their religion tended to keep them living more decent, stable lives than might have been possible for them otherwise. (Most live virtually their entire lives in church-centric societies, often even employed by other Mormons.)
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)exactly do they derive good values from being racists , cowards, and homophobes? It would be a miracle.
This strikes me as what would be the case presented by a bunch of christian types, channeling Ben Carson, trying their hardest to find a way to excuse multiple manifestations of hate. Really easy to ignore the effect if they can keep the tragedy they cause away from what they do behind locked doors.
Unlike the liars and hypocrites in the churches. Of which, in 60 odd years, and after visiting a number of churches and different (they think) religions, I have found precisely 1 exception.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And they do vary strongly. That should be obvious to one who is presumably opposed to bigotry and hate. Let's remember that a tendency to bigotry manifests against religion every bit as much as it does toward skin color and all the other usual targets.
Bias is an inborn personality characteristic that is hard wired into people to various degrees by our genetic code and then affected by environment. NO religion or any other teachings are needed for a person prone to bigotry to be hostile toward outlier groups, i.e., those they see as not "us."
Note that teachings of bigotry mostly fail in people who aren't wired to bias. A person may be taught to believe "orientals" are all bad drivers because they lack peripheral vision (an eye shape thing) but be totally lacking in the hostility that accompanies true bias. (A very nice but clueless coworker once explained their unfortunate "driving problem" to me.)
Thus, people without much tendency to bias are not strongly pushed to it by environmental factors, while those with a definite tendency will become the kind of bigots you are imagining all religious people it be. Some churches draw people with a naturally strong bias and encourage it. Some churches act in the opposite way to minimize it.
Also, it might be helpful to know that people prone to bias usually have problems with a whole range of people who are not "like them," not just one group as we often imagine. A very strongly biased Black Catholic Republican American is going to tend to be hostile toward people who are not Black and Catholic and Republican and American, and also others, motorcycle riders if people "like her" don't ride motorcycles and people who eat sushi if she strongly disapproves of people who eat uncooked fish.
Oh, yes, and bias tends to correlate with conservatism, less and less as liberalism increases. The more conservative the personality, the stronger the tendency to bias -- especially in the subgroup of strong social and/or religious conservatives (there are your "bigotry and hate" culprits!). Those last are the ones who cause most of the man-on-man trouble in the world. Ben Carson seems to be one -- his belief that no Muslim should ever be president is a big clue. I'm guessing not all of his fans are. He draws social and religious conservatives but also some who were attracted by his "niceness" and and "mellowness" and may not have looked any deeper.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)ticky tacky boxes
Their message is phony, as well as anyone who subscribes to it. I don't need it and don't want it around.
When they decide to treat everyone else as equals, maybe, but I give no quarter to people who insist shoving their delusional behavior onto others, no matter how many excuses someone makes for them.
cya
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)JTuck004?
Would you go so far as to agree with those who say the only good (insert names of any of @10,000 religions on earth here) is a dead (insert names of any of @10,000 religions on earth here)? Or is that going too far?
I'm not at all fond of what aggressive religionists are doing my self, but I was talking about bigotry, which, after all, is something different.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)Some, like ISIS, are overtly, extremely, violently bigoted against even sects withing Islam.
But North American Christianity is full of passive aggressive bigotry. I grew up in that world. They are instructed to be "humble" but they secretly cannot help but to think, because they have seen the light, others that are not a part of their fellowship are "lost". It proves they are smarter and better because they can see the obvious: An invisible giant with a white beard, who has no beginning, just decided one day (and I don't even understand if there can be such a thing as a "one day" in the context of a timeless "no beginning" to create a planet of little versions of Himself..for the sole purpose of, as states in the Bible, to glorify Him. Talk about an ego. But I digress.
I've seen it myself. Its the most insidious type of bigotry. A smiling, glazed eyes, zero respect for your secular (worldly and corrupted) viewpoints type.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)along with too many of type you describe so well, Lug. It takes more than religion to make a bigot. First, it takes a bigot. And if you have a bigot, no religion is needed. Secular society all by itself can fan and direct the hostility.
Notably, to the point I was trying to make, even Democratic Underground itself can provide all the direction and encouragement a person genetically wired to bigotry might need to identify and go after various targets for their hostility.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)it makes them judgemental
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)mdbl
(4,973 posts)by taking the word moron and putting an M in the middle.
talk about pretzel logic
LiberalNotLibertine
(8 posts)Not everybody who remains within the church, agrees with the decision. Some may have no opinion too.
Those "little bastards" are both young men and women, who happen to 19 and 20 years old. Cut them a break until they are old enough to understand life and absorb the consequences of the church's actions.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)childish excuses.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)"....members in same-sex relationships would be considered apostates and their children would be barred from religious life. This exclusion includes baptism, which in the Mormon faith is required for salvationin other words, the church, at least under its own theology, is forcibly keeping kids from God as punishment for their parents' love."
So much for welcoming the children of the Lord God.
_________
http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/11/11/mormon_anti_gay_apostate_policy_forces_thousands_to_leave_the_lds_church.html
onecent
(6,096 posts)needs to be shut down. I have a friend - a 75 year old lady who is wrecking 4 or 5 families with her
fucing stupid devotion to this fucking scam.
She gives 500 a month to a mormon church and she lives with a daughter than cannot feed her own
children...and grandchildren..
cuz most of the grandchildren are in prison or dead.
jesus..i get sick of the mormon shit.
If I offend anyone. TOUGH SHIT..
I've had enough of this and their CRAP.
she doesn't have 500 a month....
god damn assholes.
avebury
(10,952 posts)(at least enough to be able to put food on the table). If grandma isn't good with that then she needs to find somewhere else to live.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)This goes to the most basic principles of who and what we are.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)also cesletter.com is a great link to send to questioning members.
If anyone here needs help please let me know.
yardwork
(61,620 posts)FreeState
(10,572 posts)I'm barely here so it's nice to see you here when I am! Hope all is well!
Skittles
(153,160 posts)yes INDEED
NonMetro
(631 posts)Why not just give them the finger and walk away?
But, I guess anyone who believes that nonsense about Joseph Smith would probably think they need to file a letter, I suppose.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)They will send members to you're house every six months to check on you. You will be on their records and counted as a member until you die. The church uses this to lie about their true membership numbers.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)ToxMarz
(2,167 posts)Who can even imagine what they will do with former LGBT members and their children. Best to never be on their radar.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)some overzealous members jumped the gun and started posthumously baptizing victims of the Holocaust.
There should be a warning label for those thinking of converting. Still, I guess I'd just stand at the door and give them the finger whenever they came by.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)That means that they will continue to send missionaries to your door periodically. And they include you when they are stating how many people are in the Church.
Former member here.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)How long were you LDS for? What state are you from? Is the rest of your family still in the Church? Do they give you a hard time about not attending? Were they devastated when you formally resigned and accepted the "eternal consequences?"
I saw where you posted that you are hardly ever here anymore, so I hope you come back in the next 30 days and see this message.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)I'm curious to hear if any of them would like to explain how they justify that to themselves. Or the egregious racism** of their holy book, but one thing at a time.
*Literally, because you can't fully participate (you can't attend temple weddings or proxy baptize dead people) unless you're paying up and attending an annual performance interview with a weird old man who asks you if you masturbate
**Did you know some people have dark skin to let everybody know they're wicked, and if they stop being wicked god will make them white? It's in the book of Mormon. Repeatedly. It's a major plot point, because the main body of the text is literally the story of a genocidal race war between tribes of holy white people and cursed dark people.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)I guess some people separate out the way things work in the Church from what they find acceptable in the broader society.
In other words, they might expect an active Mormon not to have an abortion or fail to be celibate outside of heterosexual marriage. But for non-Mormons maybe they think it is OK, since they are not violating the rules of the Church.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)And again, that's not some obscure text or tortured read, it's literally the entire plot of LDS scripture.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)In recent years that was changed to "pure and delightsome."
I think that a liberal Mormon interprets the words "white" and "dark" skin differently. Maybe they don't see it as referring to race.
I don't really know. I am not LDS.
But I have often wondered how liberal Mormons reconcile these things, along with others, like the priesthood ban until 1978.
I only know that there are liberal Mormons who love Obama, support gay rights, are pro-choice and regularly vote for Democrats.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)practicing Roman Catholics.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Even little me sitting in CCD getting ready for first communion had no time for sexist nonsense. Fortunately I didn't have to tough it out through confirmation, and my kid sister didn't even have to put up with it for as long as I did.
I don't know how Mormon kids dealt. All the sexism, all the homophobia, bonus racism and you get an Amish grade shunning if you don't conform?
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Thank you I learned something today
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:27 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/may/05/a-sinner-in-mecca-gay-filmmaker-on-a-hajj-of-defianceThis is a gay man who is a devout Muslim, and who went to Mecca even though he put himself in terrible danger just to practice his faith. Which is to say, you can't demand that any liberal who is a Mormon "explain" themselves if you don't demand it, as well, of any other member of a bigoted religion (and that includes all the oldies). Why is anyone Jewish, a Christian, etc. given what the bible says about the sin of homosexuality? Or how to treat women, etc.? Why is this gay man still a devout Muslim?
Here's the thing: What we're drawn to, or love, we love in spite of its flaws. That includes loving people who aren't perfect, and it includes loving countries that aren't perfect, and it includes loving political parties and politicians that aren't perfect. There are always points past which any of these can go and not be forgiven by a given person; a point at which the church, country, person or politician will lose the follower. But we humans have a lot of...well, hope/delusion (you decide), and we have a difficult time giving up that which we're used to or which gives us comfort, or which we just like no matter how bad it is, even bad to us.
Putting it another way, people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. YOU believe in something or someone--a country, political party, politician, person, whatever, that probably has let you down in one way or another. Someone else may demand to know how you can still believe in them given this, to "explain yourself!"--but just because it seems "obvious" to them that this is unforgivable doesn't mean it seems "obvious" to you. You know this thing, and it gives you something you need, and you get to decide at what point the wrongs it's doing are so unforgivable that you can't remain with it any longer.
There is no excusing the bad a thing or a person does. But there is 'forgiving" the bad in the assumption that, eventually, the country, religion, person or politician will shed that bad and only the good that we love in that thing will remain. Most liberals who are still loyal to their country, religion, etc. see in it the potential to do that. To change for the better. They may be total wrong, and if they are, that thing will lose them. But until then, that's all the explanation there is. "I like this thing, I need this thing, I believe it can get past this bad (which I don't believe in) and be good." And, "I'm not giving up on this good thing simply because it has lost its way. If I leave it, who will be in it to help change it?"
You don't have to agree with any of this, but that's the explanation. And we're all guilty of thinking it, now and again, in regards to something or someone.
for the balanced reply
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)are working to change the old rules to help their sect or denomination or religion become more inclusive, especially those belief systems which are at a crossroads in the governing body.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)Or a Roman Catholic (or any Christian for that matter), or a Muslim, or...
How can ANY religious person be a Democrat.
Who will we have left?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Their beliefs about race are remarkably similar: that white Americans are descended of a lost tribe of Israel, that black people are cursed by god and have diminished spiritual capacity, that intermarriage is cursed, that race war is mandated by god, that believers must prepare for a coming apocalypse.
B2G
(9,766 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Lacking pre-qualifiers, "ANY religious person" directly implies radical fringe groups in addition to the non-radical and non-fringe...
B2G
(9,766 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Obviously, opinion does not equal understanding. As usual.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)It's even called "The Book of Mormon" and every time I see a tv commercial for it I'm just amazed. It doesn't seem possible that anything about that religion could be made into entertainment.
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)Don't know anything else about it, though.
================
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,381 posts)Also quite sardonic of the Mormon faith. Oddly, the church does not condemn the musical. I guess they are taking a "it's ok to laugh at ourselves sometimes approach." I mean really, they don't have a choice. The play is a huge hit and is almost always sold out on Broadway and where ever it tours.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)... you should it is very funny.
roody
(10,849 posts)yellerpup
(12,253 posts)at the performance I saw. It's the best Broadway musical I've ever seen and the ONLY time I've seen people to react with such enthusiasm. Not against Mormons, but for the brilliant script, performances, and song.
Submariner
(12,504 posts)If I wasn't baptized as an infant and brainwashed about all that imaginary sky people shit from 1st grade through high school I probably would not have bitter feelings about being part of the roman catholic church of child rape.
Setting the age at 18 is good so one can decide if they want to be a member of one of these super cults.
Of course the age won't be changed for everyone because the snake oil salemen need to start the brainwashing early and strike fear of the lord early and often to get our money.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)their parents' marriages, and recognize the union as sinful, if they want to be baptized or go on a mission.
The policy also applies to children whose parents are living with a same-gender partner, even if they are not married.
This policy applies to all children. Even if they are living with a straight parent (and maybe stepparent) while the non-custodial parent is in a gay relationship.
Basically, it means that if you have a gay parent who is in a committed, cohabiting relationship you cannot fully join the church as a child. No baby naming, no blessings, no baptism, no priesthood, no mission. And when you turn 18 you must denounce the sinful nature of your parent.
You're allowed to keep loving your family. And you're allowed to attend church events as a non-member.
keithbvadu2
(36,809 posts)old time religion.
It's called original sin.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)And I thought original sin referred to Adam and Eve.
keithbvadu2
(36,809 posts)Adam and Eve? Yep!
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)This cult of pure evil has too much influence.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)says something about who they are.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Mormon society organized by and around the church. For some whose work doesn't take them into the outside world, it can be all. Like this story.
Long ago now, a delightful and admirable older Mormon mother of 9 in our neighborhood was literally famous among Mormon communities for all her activities within their society, their home constantly filled with guests from almost anywhere in the world and various activities, including political -- but always Mormon.
One year she (scrupulously under her quiet husband's guidance, as her commitment to being a good wife never allowed her to fail to seek that! ) felt she should take a step outside Mormon society to become our elementary school's PTA president. That's also the year ours was named California's most outstanding PTA, and no coincidence. We were good before, sure, but California's a big state.
To the point finally: Even familiar with church ways because of a bunch of Mormons in our neighborhood, the rest of us were surprised when this extremely redoubtable woman (think Hillary Clinton permanently in gracious and charming mode) noted at a luncheon meeting in her house that this was the very first time she had ever entertained anyone who was not Mormon. She would have been in her mid-40s at the time.
End of story, except that if any of their children had left the church, he would have had to also leave behind his really wonderful family and the close-knit society he had grown up in since birth, including all his friends (once in the teens, all Mormon). Inside with them OR alone outside in an alien, indifferent, unsupportive world. That's the choice.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)My high school basic schedule (this is the minimum - often it was more):
Monday: 6:30 -7:30 early morning seminary, Family Home Evening (two hours usually)
Tuesday: 6:30 -7:30 early morning seminary, Youth group 7pm - 9pm
Wednesday: 6:30 -7:30 early morning seminary,
Thursday: 6:30 -7:30 early morning seminary,
Friday: 6:30 -7:30 early morning seminary,
Saturday: Once a month dance. (3 hours)
Sunday: Church 3 hour block, plus any meetings I needed to attend, home teaching once a month. (4 hours average)
Thats about 16 hours a week. As a teenager. As an adult its about 10-12 hours a week.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)was seemingly people living comfortable, secure, stables lives who seemingly didn't want anything else. They really seemed just like the rest of us, just some appeared more self satisfied. There must been a square peg here or there and tragedy in progress, but I wasn't inside so never heard of any.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)presented to the world, and I'm sorry but not surprised. I've never been a round peg sort of person myself, but then I also never had either a place to belong or one that I had to break free of. Better? Worse?
StevieM
(10,500 posts)FreeState
(10,572 posts)It depended on the week. It was held every week though.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)FreeState
(10,572 posts)I just referred to it as youth group so that the average person would get the general idea.
https://www.lds.org/callings/aaronic-priesthood/leader-resources/mutual-and-other-activities?lang=eng
niyad
(113,315 posts)prophecy, either.
Paper Roses
(7,473 posts)This book about Mormon history, its beginning to recent, came to me as part of my book swap group. I know nothing of this religion except they have a great choir and are headquartered in Utah. What a scary, strange history.
Worth a read if you care to know more about this religion.
Under the Banner of Heaven. A Story of Violent Faith
by Jon Krakauer. Published in 2004
Well written, well researched.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)I'm not going to join in the vitriol against Mormons in general. Needless to say, I'm not a Mormon and find some parts of the Mormon doctrine odious, although some other parts are admirable. I appreciate Mormon teaching about commitment to family life, but I do wish LDS elders would take a much less narrow view of what a family is and urge them to do so.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)It's more complicated than that.
If you don't write to the Church and demand that they remove your name from the Church records they continue to consider you a Mormon. They continue to identify you as a member of the Church. And that can create problems for an inactive Mormon who considers themselves an ex-Mormon.
First, the Church will send missionaries to your door to try to get you to come back to church. And they don't just come once. They come about every six months (although I am sure it varies from ward to ward). And the people from your old ward will often make efforts to return you to the fold.
Second, they will continue to count you among their members when they publicize how many people are in the Church.
Third, many ex-Mormons want to formally establish that they are not LDS (Latter Day Saint) anymore. They want to sever all ties to the Church and establish that they are not just inactive members--they are non-members.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)from -THE- Book of Life.
An act of an apostate would essentially be treason against the church.
Telling the brothers who come knocking that God makes his will known to you and he says the President of the Church/Prophet is full of shit, and that I was taking out a restraining order to keep them from stalking worked for me.
Since the Supreme Court ruled to allow same sex marriage, the Mormon Church and many other faiths are again pushing their agenda to discriminate against gay people in any way possible. The attitude is "our way or the highway". One of the Supreme Court Justices when ruling to allow same sex marriage indicated his vote to allow was partially based on how the children of these couples would feel if the land of the free decided to back the faith leaders and create two classes of people. And what does the Mormon Church do, exactly what the Supreme Court feared. I thought faith was based on love and caring.
lanlady
(7,134 posts)--for those who have had the courage to do so.
My ex-Mormon friends described to me how they were harassed for months on end and made to feel like complete outcasts. They were shunned by their families. This is a cult that relies on clever brainwashing and indoctrination. When I left the Catholic Church, no one noticed or cared. The Mormon Church, however, not only wants to keep collecting that 10 % tithe but is also nearly as fearful of outside scrutiny as the Scientologists.
Ugh! Good luck to these mass defectors, they are doing the right thing.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)mwooldri
(10,303 posts)Matthew 19:14 - Jesus said, Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these. (NIV Bible).
So what part of "do not hinder them" do these so-called disciples get? Obviously not a lot of it, since that's what they appear to be doing.
The CCC
(463 posts)Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Matthew 19:14
Don Draper
(187 posts)that heavenly father's plan is that marriage should be only between a man and a woman, and a woman, and a woman and a woman.
LiberalNotLibertine
(8 posts)The primary reason why a change of church doctrine occurred in regard to marriage, was to appease Washington DC in an attempt to admit Utah to the Union.
LiberalNotLibertine
(8 posts)I am neither LDS or gay, but who really cares? I don't need a church to pray, worship, and do His good works; neither does anyone else.
However, if the church leaders decide to excommunicate me for any reason, I would just find another religion to worship within. I have no doubt that I would be able to locate a denomination which falls in line with my beliefs.
Every religion has something that someone disagrees with. It may work for some, but not for others.......but again, so what? Does anyone really want to remain where they aren't welcomed?
It would be worse if your religious leader's last name was Jones, Koresh, Alamo, Bent, Hale, LeBaron, Drew, et al.
IronLionZion
(45,443 posts)the church leaders and other mormons are all up in your business making sure you're doing approved activities
zwyziec
(173 posts)Another reason for them to excommunicate this cult
Srkdqltr
(6,290 posts)Did they actually do this? or is this just nothing?
This post has been here for several days.
What Happened?? Anything?
Maeve
(42,282 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:22 PM - Edit history (1)
http://time.com/4113873/mormons-quit-church/Hundreds of Mormons resigned from the church on Saturday to protest a new policy banning children with same-sex parents from being baptized until they reach adulthood, according to reports.
And later, from NPR:
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/11/16/456224955/more-than-1-000-mormons-resign-from-the-lds-church-in-protest?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news