Bill Clinton: Extend all tax cuts temporarily
Source: Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former President Bill Clinton said Tuesday that broad tax cuts that expire in January should be temporarily renewed, including for the wealthiest Americans, to give lawmakers time to reach a deal on a longer-term extension that should exclude the rich.
Clinton's comments were in contrast to President Barack Obama, whose re-election he is supporting. Obama has opposed renewing the tax reductions for people earning over $250,000 a year, saying they must contribute to the effort to control rampant federal deficits.
Reductions in income tax rates and other levies first enacted under President George W. Bush expire in January, at the same time that $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts begin to take effect. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and others have warned that letting both events occur would suck so much money out of the economy that it could spark a renewed recession next year.
"What I think we need to do is to find some way to avoid the fiscal cliff, to avoid doing anything that would contract the economy now, and then deal with what's necessary in the long-term debt reduction plan as soon as they can, which presumably will be after the election," Clinton said on CNBC's "Closing Bell With Maria Bartiromo."
Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TAX_CUTS_CLINTON?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-06-05-19-27-40
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)No!
WTF?
ClearThinker
(2 posts)Make 'em permanent or you'll see no new jobs.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)are the jobs? The wealthy create jobs in China. Give the tax breaks to US Small businesses who are the ones who actually create jobs.
End the tax cuts for the wealthy, I agree with the President. They have cost this country over 2 trillion dollars and we got nothing in return.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)No, they don't create jobs. A strong middle class with purchasing power creates jobs.
I've seen protest signs reading "Cut my taxes and I'll hire more" at tax-cut demonstrations. Really? If we cut taxes on an owner of a small business, are we really supposed to believe that person will hire more employees? To do what? Stand around and do nothing because there hasn't been an increase in demand for the employer's goods or services? Increase demand for goods and services and small businesses will have to hire additional employees to keep up with the demand! And increased demand comes from consumers with purchasing power.
I sooner think cutting taxes on small business will prompt the owner to pocket the money rather than hire employees.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)just one or two each, but as someone with experience in small business, several of them, I know for a fact that small businesses get very few breaks. Those all go to the Big Corps.
However, I am not asking for tax cuts for anyone, just end the Bush tax cuts, and the sooner the better. Also tax Corporations who take their business to third world slave factories. If they don't like it, they can always move to the countries where they are hiring people.
Job creation is the best stimulus. When people have jobs they spend money and pay taxes, which creates demand for more products etc. etc.
So what I am in favor of is, is a huge FDR style works program.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)what tax cuts to the wealthy have done is allowed a very large disparity of wealth; also allows the wealthy to ship that money overseas, while shipping jobs overseas. Since reagan, getting peed on does not work, will never work unless you are the wealthy-if you are labor, you are screwed. Also, some of those global corporations have greatly profited from the bogus war little boots fabricated. They've made money off of misery, and yet were not asked to sacrifice. Instead, they were given even more.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Funny cause under Eisenhower the top marginal tax rate was 92 percent, yet the wealthy were still rich and union membership the highest. Operating under the mistaken notion that by bribing the wealthy and corporations with tax cuts, less oversight and decades of pathetic ass kissing has resulted in jobs sent overseas, stagnant wage growth and unemployment. Sell your sad, failing strategy elsewhere.
CrispyQ
(36,482 posts)newspeak
(4,847 posts)the obscene tax cuts have been for over ten years-where's the jobs. After the tax cuts, what we saw with little boots was decline. We have millionaires-billionaires who are saying enough is enough. They are more than willing to pay their share. Even some of the one per centers are seeing that it's become so obscene-of course, they are more for the country than all out greed. When we had a higher tax rate, we had higher employment with decent jobs.
give tax incentives, like eisenhower did in the fifties, hiring americans. No tax cuts for those shipping jobs overseas; as well as, the money.
I'd suggest you look at the historical tax chart since the depression. what we are seeing now is absolutely nothing but greed. I'm not willing to go back to the good old greedy, corrupt robber baron days. As more people lose their decent jobs, especially those in their fifties, what the teabaggers (norquist) want to do is take away the social safety net. We need it now more than ever with the economic conditions little boots created. Respected economists have stated that we need to get the money circulating amongst the plebes. Austerity now would create even more economical damage. That's not throwing money to ones who have gotten even wealthier, including global corporations, that have seen profits over eighty percent while cutting wages. It's giving to the masses who are actually going to spend it.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Except maybe Social Security, but only a nominal fee... we can always remove the cap on that.
bloomington-lib
(946 posts)How many times should it be extended?
Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)Obama AND Clinton both know that tax cuts create jobs.
this is yet another reason why we should oppose the far right-who will only mess up our centrist job creation plans.
boppers
(16,588 posts)Tax cuts do create debt, and do fund job creation.
Which would be fine, if the debt was ever paid. Somehow.
Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)Obama already knows this is key-which is why he and the Democratic majority had to extend the Bush tax cuts.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Your time is done. TYVM for Nafta and Glass-Steaghall. Now just STFU!!!!!!!!!
lunasun
(21,646 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)He seemed like a breath of fresh air at the time, but Clinton has turned out to be no damned good.
Just the fact that he pals around with GHWB...
newspeak
(4,847 posts)I voted for clinton to keep NAFTA-GATT from passing, since it was poppy's baby. No wonder poppy considers clinton one of his own.
I believe up on the hill, it's tweedle dee and tweedle dumber; and then, there's a few for the american people, who those on the hill attempt to purge.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)First with the "sterling" Romney remarks and now with this bullshit. We need, need to raise taxes, particularly on the richie rich class. He is not helping, only hurting. He needs to get the message straight or shut the fuck up.
Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)Now I see why he and the DEM majority extended the Bush tax cuts-to create all of these wonderful jobs.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)All Clinton is doing is agreeing with Obama and the centrist DEMS who extended the Bush tax cuts.
despite what the far left says, it creates jobs. Just look around.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)And so do centrists in general.
Nothing sarcastic about success.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)"new democrats" "DLCers". anyone whose seen the dlcer platform knows it looks like the damn repug platform, minus the crazies.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)I ain't seeing all those jobs despite the Obama tax cuts for people and Snyder's tax cut for corporations.
This is NOT sarcasm.
NickB79
(19,257 posts)Have we had ANY months since the "recovery" started in which we had over 150,000 jobs/mo. created? If so, they must have been few and far between, because what I remember are a lot of months with 50,000-80,000 jobs/mo.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Unless he is #1, there is to be no recovery. I don't know whether he'd even allow Hillary to direct a recovery, his ego is so fat.
agent46
(1,262 posts)He keeps demonstrating his total disengagement with these observations and suggestions.
babsbunny
(8,441 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,376 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)the frickin 1% spends and they want that to keep going, grrrr
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)They don't buy any more U.S. made stuff than the folks who shop at WalMart, unless they're into local food and NOT into products imported from Europe, particularly France.
Luxury Japanese or German cars, clothing imported mostly from France, Italy and Germany. They spend a lot of vacation money overseas as well.
Maybe they buy a yacht made here.
Maybe they buy some new digs here, maybe elsewhere, like Europe, Argentina or Singapore.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Time to retire the DLC hacks permanently. Their product has gone sour.
jmowreader
(50,561 posts)Folks, we are not running against Mitt Romney this year. We're running against Grover Norquist, even though he's not on the ballot.
If we do not say something like this, Norquist will run a billion dollars in ads claiming the Democrats want to raise YOUR taxes, even though it's not true--the people we want to raise taxes on aren't going to notice the difference.
What I would really like to see come out of the next Congress is a bill that locks spending increases to the inflation rate, reduces taxes on the working class, keeps the Bush personal tax rates where they are, and limits the amount of income taxable at the capital gains rate to $250,000. We also need a clause that revokes the citizenship and deports anyone using overseas tax shelters to evade more than $500,000 in federal income tax.
This is how it works: We know Mitt Romney made $25 million last year and most of it--let's say $24 million just to make it easy--was taxed at the 15 percent capital gains rate. Under my plan, Romney will pay 15 percent on the first $500,000, and 35 percent on the other $23.5 million. And if he buries a lot of money in Switzerland to avoid paying Uncle Sam his fair share? That's fine; he can just pack his shit and go live with his money...and he will then find that the cost of living in Switzerland makes American income taxes look pretty damn cheap.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)Wisconsin. Now go home and stay there until you are needed in the early fall. We'll call and you will get a script.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)more than he needs us? He has a perfectly good life running the Global Initiative. Regardless of what many on this board think, Pres Clinton is the most popular politician in the country. That the far left doesn't like him does't mean shit....they're the same ones calling Pres Obama a fascist and have made themselves irrelevant to the conversation.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)pro-labor, pro-union-you're far left. Pro-corporate regulation-you're far left. Pro-rule of law-you're far left. Pro-public agencies (education), instead of corporatized government-you're far left. No, we're democrats who believe in the FDR democratic platform. I'd say some democrats have gone right of eisenhower and even nixon.
RUMMYisFROSTED
(30,749 posts)This is what we call a Mole.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Hotler
(11,428 posts)Just like Obama turned a blind eye to the crimes by shrub. Tax the rich till their eyes bleed.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)Flatpicker
(894 posts)He's advocating that we not introduce any uncertainty into the market for the short term and then make some long term plans that remove the tax cuts and hopefully remove some of the loopholes that exist in our tax code as is.
It does make sense from the aspect of trying to keep the economy we have now in growth, while giving the businesses some time to factor the new tax changes into account. That way it's not an uncertainty more than a "identifiable cost of doing business".
From where we are now, it's smart but, it wouldn't have been necessary had we had a plan agreed upon that could have been brought in with plenty of time for analysis.
boppers
(16,588 posts)This is one of the ways.
No business ever has "certainty". Ever. If I want to invest in a capital asset, I am not asking myself "will my amortization change in a year", or "will it affect my taxation rates"?
I am asking myself "can this shit pay itself off, and turn profit somehow"?
Economists, who have never owned and run a business, ask themselves these questions, which is why they don't own businesses, and dither over existential questions, about future hypothetical situations, that they do not understand.
I'd like to see if Paul Krugman can run a food cart business. I'm guessing it would fail in 6 months, regardless of his Nobel.
Can we discuss these things using commonly accepted terms without having somebody insulting how it's talked about.
Look, I get the "Can I pay this shit off" thinking, but, I don't talk that way normally.
There are some things that you know in business going fwd. Can we call them "certainty"? How do you know if you can pay off something and turn a profit if you don't have some idea what your costs are?
Could they change? Sure they can, but, we need to have some word for it.
potone
(1,701 posts)Has he started inhaling???
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,416 posts)if the tax cuts aren't really helping the economy, how will taking them away hurt? What's with all this "fiscal cliff" madness that the CBO is talking about?
florida08
(4,106 posts)Says one thing in Wisconsin then something else on the tube. Deficits and debt don't magically disappear Bill..remember how you raised taxes and took money from SS. Cenk talked about this tonight.
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)....hey Bill, have you forgotten where you've come from? Now that you've joined the ranks of Americas' wealthiest Americans you seem to have forgotten that the 1% have been getting all the breaks and those tax cuts you're being generous with are going to be paid for by gutting our social programs....we should be taxing the shit out of the 1%, not extending their tax breaks....
"...to give lawmakers time to reach a deal..."
....you're kidding me?....are you blind?....have you been out of the country for the last four years? There's no 'reaching a deal' with the pukes, it's their way or the highway....you really need to stop triangulating, we no longer can avoid stepping in your triangulation....I've got your triangulation all over my clean shoes....
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)He came from a poor family in a poor state, but he seems to have forgotten all about it.
This is not the Bill Clinton who nearly got elected Congressman on a liberal platform in a conservative district.
Nor is it the Bill Clinton who was elected Arkansas' "Boy Governor" in 1978.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)rosesaylavee
(12,126 posts)Your days of screwing us are over.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Mayflower1
(100 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)They have had years to prove they are the "job creators" and have FAILED miserably. They need to be taked hard and the loop holes closed. GREED is killing this country.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)magic59
(429 posts)he didn't understand economics when he was president and he doesn't understand it now. He was a good republican president.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)his budget accomplishment?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)economy hummed right along during the 90s. This Clinton hatred is fucking hilarious. Most popular politician in the country and the short sighted lemmings here want him to go home and shut up.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)it was going to go in the shitter overnight? And, what the trade treaty did to mexican labor, especially, farmers, is unforgivable. And, we got people here crying about those aliens coming here, after our trade policy helped create the environment.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)Bill was the best Republican president in 50 years. Now, Bill, just go get Monica and moan a little bit. At least if you're getting a BJ, you won't have time to mouth off on tv.
sad sally
(2,627 posts)to end the Bush/Obama tax cuts for all those rich folks was dreaming. Heck, the rich people need their money, and taxes certainly can't be raised on middle income nor poor people. The payroll holiday will also be extended. Maybe Germany can bail us out.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)As a teacher I pay double the tax rate of Tax Haven Mitt with his $250 million AND ExxonMobil.
How is this fair, Bill?
rayofreason
(2,259 posts)Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)...with Bush.
That is centrism is all about-combining the best of both worlds in order to get things done.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)centrism. What is getting done except the 1% keep getting more and more tax breaks?
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)newspeak
(4,847 posts)keep moving to the right and it's just plain fascism.
Thrill
(19,178 posts).
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)cstanleytech
(26,300 posts)are really still Republicans have made it clear they wont negotiate on the taxes so its time imo to break out the nuclear option and let the taxes lapse and make them come to the table for a change on our terms, not theirs.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)P.S. Why, when I typed that, was the print barely visible?
indoposting
(1 post)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)BamaFanLee
(64 posts)The money has to come from somewhere???
newspeak
(4,847 posts)we are the ones who they want to sacrifice; be it tearing up the social safety net, doing screw you voo doo with our SS or increasing our taxes while most of us are now working for shitty pay.
We always wind up paying. the american people paid for the S&L heist, we pay every time WS gambles. We pay for bailouts, with little in return, we pay for every corruption they commit. And, the more damage they do and corruption they commit, the more we are asked to pay. The people in california paid bigtime for the enron scandal. But, hey, we need to sacrifice, don't want to worry the have mores beautiful little minds.
earthside
(6,960 posts)Ultimately, I have no doubt this is the position Pres. Obama will take sometime in September or October.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...Bill, seriously, STFU with that shit...
Seriously, we need to keep the tax cuts in place in case the economy contracts....Um, dude, have you not seen what they tax cuts did to the economy in the first place?
Idiot.
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)now that we have seen the damage it has done.
and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)End those fucking shrub tax cuts tomorrow.
Seriously...is he trying to undermine Obama? Why is he saying that?
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)marshall
(6,665 posts)And he loves the limelight.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Do you like Apples, Bill? I will fight til my last dying breath make sure the wealthy pay their fair share. How do you like them apples Mr. 1%er?
Julie-with a big Fuck You to President Clinton
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)Oh wait! Obama is already doing that! Gutting SS.
otherone
(973 posts)hiss
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... for 8 years of peace and prosperity, the finest days of my life. I remember the Simpsons episode where homer says "one good thing about the '90s being over, we'll never have a president as bad as Bill Clinton again..." Marge - "yeah, he was the worst president ever"... the joke being 8 years of Chimpy to come
wordpix
(18,652 posts)June 06, 2012 7:07 pm ET by Marcus Feldman
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201206060021
Fox "straight news" host Martha MacCallum today pushed the narrative that former President Bill Clinton is advocating the extension of all the Bush tax cuts. In fact, according to Clinton's office, he "does not believe the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans should be extended again."
On Tuesday, Clinton discussed in an interview with CNBC's Maria Bartiromo whether the Bush tax cuts should be extended into 2013. Later that day, Clinton's office released a statement saying that the former president opposes extending the Bush tax cuts for the highest earners, but believes that all of the tax cuts may have to be temporarily extended because it will be difficult for Congress to come to a long-term agreement until after the election. From USA Today:
snip:
Despite Clinton's clear statement opposing the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, MacCallum today reported that Clinton favors extending all the Bush tax cuts. During an interview with Alan Colmes and Tucker Carlson, MacCallum remarked that Clinton "said that extending all the Bush tax cuts until next year would be quote, The best thing to do, and that timing is at odds with what the president has said."
At one point during the segment, Fox aired a caption that read: "Bill Clinton: Extend All Bush Tax Cuts Temporarily."
newspeak
(4,847 posts)unless, you're monitoring them. I'm glad their big fabrication was exposed; and that clinton didn't say such a moronic thing.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)suprised it took so long for someone to catch it