Rolling Stone endorses Hillary Clinton
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by azurnoir (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: hill
Rolling Stone magazine is endorsing Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton.
"Hillary Clinton has an impressive command of policy, the details, trade-offs and how it gets done. It's easy to blame billionaires for everything, but quite another to know what to do about it," editor and publisher Jann S. Wenner said in an editorial published Wednesday.
While praising aspects of Democratic rival Bernie Sanders's call for breaking up the big banks and his emphasis on inequality, Wenner blasted the independent Vermont senator's explanation of a "political revolution" to get his agenda through Congress.
"This is a vague, deeply disingenuous idea that ignores the reality of modern America," Wenner wrote, adding, "I have been to the revolution before. It ain't happening." He also praised Clinton's experience as secretary of State and focus on social justice issues.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/274009-rolling-stone-endorses-hillary
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Arguably the leading political voice in Rolling Stone:
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/712474806080446466
He's right, if Wenner, with his $700,000,000 wants to endorse the plutocratic candidate, Wenner has every right to do so.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/rolling-stone-sued-by-uva-students-over-rape-story_us_55b94f35e4b0af35367a390d
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/12/nicole-eramo-sues-rolling-stone-uva_n_7266972.html
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Thanks for asking!
Zorro
(15,746 posts)Every financially successful business is evil.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)When success is determined only financially, we really shouldn't expect any action that doesn't have a financial motive, should we?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)is like all that popular nowadays. Maxim maybe Rolling Stone? hasn't been on the radar since they shrank it.
Doc_Technical
(3,527 posts)It hasn't been the same after they moved
from San Francisco to New York.
jbeck
(3 posts)I am so happy that Mr. Wenner in his vaulted position and with his condescending words finds it to be his responsibility to blast Bernie Sanders. I may be a dreamer but I am not the only one.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)that short-sightedness and non-comprehension are NOT an exclusive of those in the lower strata of our society.
I'm a dreamer too.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)So we shouldn't bother to try.
Rolling Stone started as a counter-argument to the establishment.
They found it's easier to get along if it goes along.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,175 posts)Or sabotaged by Obama himself in exchange for membership in The Club. Either way, once the 'No We Can't" had been fully established, and sealed down even further with Obama's second term win, Hillary is simply carrying on Obama's legacy. Its the simplest, easiest route. The now established "No We Can't" meme is the new normal. So when Sanders actually re-animated the "Yes We Can" meme, the DLC establishment were shocked at his popularity because they figured it they had finally killed it, and loyal Democrats had resigned themselves to the "No We Can't" New Corporate Democrat position. The Clintons, the DNC, and the rest of the corporate puppets have moved on even from the Third Way now, and into the Fourth Way. No more triangulating with the Republicans, the new fourth way is to BECOME the Republicans, or at least what they once were.
mahannah
(893 posts)seabeckind
(1,957 posts)Yes, they do. And they are implemented when the people speak to the entrenched power base.
This is from an earlier RS article:
(SNIP)
The bigger question facing Sanders, whatever you think about the merits of his ideas, is how he would ever possibly implement them, assuming he's not elected along with a Democratic sweep of both houses of Congress. Sanders, on the stump, praises President Obama for running a brilliant campaign in 2008. But then he goes on to say that the president's biggest mistake ("and I had the opportunity to tell him this I'm not sure how happy he was to hear it, but that's what I do!" was to demobilize his millions of passionate supporters after Election Day: "Politics in Washington is not about a president sitting down with Mitch McConnell or John Boehner and having a drink [and] trying to work it out that's just media nonsense. You guys want free tuition at public colleges and universities? You bring a million of your friends to march on Washington, D.C.!"
Sanders insists that the nation is less polarized than it is portrayed in the mainstream media. Through the Obama years, the Democratic Party's strategy has been to specifically target the so-called coalition of the ascendant young people, minorities, college-educated women by heightening contradictions with the GOP on issues like immigration, LGBT rights, overpolicing and abortion.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/weekend-with-bernie-sanders-20150709#ixzz43l0QCylQ
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
"Through the Obama years, the Democratic Party's strategy has been to specifically target the so-called coalition of the ascendant young people, minorities, college-educated women "
And then promptly forgets the promises -- until the next election or fundraising letter.
Got one of those today from DWS. Time to send off another $50 to Bernie.