BREAKING: Nathan Deal will veto Georgia’s ‘religious liberty’ bill
Source: AJC
Gov. Nathan Deal said he will veto the religious liberty bill that triggered a wave of criticism from gay rights groups and business leaders and presented him with one of the most consequential challenges hes faced since his election to Georgias top office.
The measure doesnt reflect the character of our state or the character of its people, the governor said Monday in prepared remarks. He said state legislators should leave freedom of religion and freedom of speech to the U.S. Constitution.
Their efforts to purge this bill of any possibility that it would allow or encourage discrimination illustrates how difficult it is to legislate something that is best left to the broad protections of the First Amendment, he said.
The two-term Republican has been besieged by all sides over the controversial measure, and his office has received thousands of emails and hundreds of calls on the debate. The tension was amplified by a steady stream of corporate titans who urged him to veto the bill and threatened to pull investments from Georgia if it became law.
Read more: http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2016/03/28/breaking-nathan-deal-will-veto-georgias-religious-liberty-bill/
Saw a CNN breaking banner as well...
shenmue
(38,506 posts)mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)On almost every issue, what corporations lobby for is the opposite of what I would lobby for if I had that kind of money/access. But on gay rights most large corporations have done the right thing, for example, by offering same-sex partner benefits long before they were required to.
mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)but also about the bottom line.. LGBT's and their families are customers too. Money talks. And then, there's the CEO's, and employees and families, most of whom have LGBT people in their lives.
Thank goodness not all corps are like Chic fil a.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)He has no choice - the long knives of big business are out to carve up the state.
Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Roland99
(53,342 posts)cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)the varies republicans in office who voted for this and are running either for re election or for a new higher office in a few months will use this to try and win over more of their voting base on a "I'm the bigger bigot so vote for me" platform.
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)The double edged sword of loss of millions in revenue & ridicule are indeed powerful weapons against the orks.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)This Lege will probably try to override his veto. The Rethugs do control both houses. Let's just wait a bit and see.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)... when you threaten their wallets.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)at least on most parts of the USA. Next target: housing and employment discrimination.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)This was a business decision.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)has ramifications. Good for him and Georgia. It's the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$'s that swayed him IMO, not wanting businesses to pull out of Georgia.
riversedge
(70,299 posts)KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)Disney, the NFL, Coca-Cola, the NBA, Salesforce, Apple, the film industry (like the makers of The Walking Dead), and other major companies say don't you dare pass that anti LGBTQ legislation.
These Republicans don't give a damn about citizens or their rights.
Damn shame we have to depend on corporations to make these clowns do the right thing.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)n/t
Solly Mack
(90,780 posts)I'm glad for everyone that stood up against the bill. They are the reason for this veto. Not Deal.
rurallib
(62,448 posts)If you miss one, there will be another by pretty soon.
One of these days there will be one he can hop on and maybe no one will notice.
You know he really wants to sign it. If he really didn't he would have vetoed it right away or threatened to veto it before it passed.
This one just tested to see how far they could go. This one went a little too far.
eggplant
(3,913 posts)Already, several conservative lawmakers have owed to call for a veto session to rebuke the governor if he rejects the measure. It takes a three-fifth majority in both chambers to call a special session, and a two-thirds majority in both chambers to override a veto a threshold the bill failed to reach by one vote in the Senate and 16 in the House.
There are enough votes in the Senate to override, predicted state Sen. Brandon Beach, an Alpharetta Republican facing a tough primary challenge who supported the measure. I dont know about the House, though.
mnhtnbb
(31,402 posts)just signed such a bill--under the guise of "protecting" women and children from bathroom peeping Toms--
but really was just an excuse to discriminate against LGBT people and make gay friendly town/cities
subservient to the Republican bigots in Raleigh.
McPurvy ( I mean, really, why all the obsession with who's in what bathroom?) and his merry band of bigots
are taking some serious blowback on the issue from all sides: corporations, universities, Chambers of Commerce--
AND a federal lawsuit is being filed today to block HB 2.
Deal probably decided it was better to let NC take the heat.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)..... I think it is a deliberate attempt to get people they think are liberal to move out of the state.
Teachers.... the film industry....
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.
Each of them have tapped into a segment of the population which hates the current state of affairs in government. The youth, in particular, are rebelling against the inane religious based crap that so many pols in state government revel in.
I add Trump, because last night I spent a lot of time with two trump supporters, one 28 and one 70. They said the same thing, and felt strongly about how they have been shafted by local pols and by government in general.
I think this Gov. is smart enough to see the writing on the wall, that the natives are restless, and that by piling on with crap legislation like this, he would be feeding the monster that may consume this country in Trump's case, or lead to liberal, progressive victories, even in Red States, in Bernie's case.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)an individual right of nullification for religious bigotry in defiance of the Fourteenth Amendment.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Who is bought and paid for.... and a coward.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)there'd be along of shit hitting the fan.
klook
(12,165 posts)And there are many more with major operations in the state - mostly in the Atlanta area.
Most CEOs are probably backward politically, but they know better than to alienate gay customers, employees, and investors.
http://www.georgia.org/industries/headquarters/georgias-fortune-500/
I hate liars
(165 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,873 posts)As I am sure you do. It is all about the money, but as long as economic boycotts - or the threat of one - works it is fine with me.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)killed any hope that we will attract any progressive companies. Gee, thanks Gov'nor.
7962
(11,841 posts)they refused to fix those issues. And he's not up for re-election, so it was an easy call.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)AllyCat
(16,219 posts)what he would have done. He is hardly a fair man.
DebbieCDC
(2,543 posts)*shocked*
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)until the shit hit the fan?
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Georgia would be broke ghost state had he signed that close minded hateful law.
Religion just causes so much hate and bloodshed....it is insane, in the end nobody really knows what.
npk
(3,660 posts)As it wouldn't have protected individuals from suing faith based institutions or those representing those institutions, i.e. such as churches. Ala the bakery in Oregon that was sued. The bill only would have prevented the government from forcing a church for instance to perform a gay wedding. So the church would still have been vulnerable from being sued by an individual, and to make matters worse the state of Georgia passed a bill right after this one that stated that an individual could sue a faith based organization for violating it's own rules and governances, such as advertising that they were free of discrimination only to in effect discriminate against those very same people.
Actually the religious right in the state should be happy this bill was vetoed, as it stood it would have opened them up to huge law suits.