University of Sioux Falls president sues Delta Air Lines over gun-related charge
Source: Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal
The president of the University of Sioux Falls in South Dakota is suing Delta Air Lines Inc. after being arrested on a gun-related charge.
University President Mark Benedetto, who spent a night in jail, says Delta breached its duty by failing to inform him of New York City's restrictive gun laws, The Argus Leader reported.
Benedetto and his wife, Gail, flew Sept. 28 to New York to pick up a piece of Sept. 11 memorabilia for a display at the school, the Sioux Falls paper reports.
Benedettos lawsuit says that when he declared that he had an unloaded handgun in a locked case inside his checked luggage, as required by the Transportation Security Administration and Delta Airlines policy, a Delta ticket agent called the New York-New Jersey Port Authority Police and he was arrested.
Read more: http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/news/2012/06/11/sd-university-president-sues-delta.html
Good luck collecting the first penny of that lawsuit....
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)petronius
(26,602 posts)was just passing through in transit from one place to another where his possession would have been legal. And I think the suit itself is BS - I have no kind words for the gate agent, the airline had no duty to inform him of any particular laws in NY (especially pertaining to a firearm that the airline would have no reason to know he was carrying). And the agent may have been following specific instructions...
On edit: You're certainly correct about the bigger picture - NYC does require some corrective action wrt to that law.
Demit
(11,238 posts)"from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm..."
NY law says you have to be a resident to lawfully carry there. I wonder how this suit will turn out. Delta could've done the decent thing & informed the guy beforehand. But you could argue the guy had a responsibility to have checked this out for himself.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)It would be easier if the gun owner were responsible for knowing the gun laws in just two states-- the one he is in, and the one he is traveling to.
The guy behind his desk already needs to know the policy for his state, the TSA, and the airline. He calls ahead to the destination and calls local authorities so they can make sure the gun owner is in compliance with their law.
However, I would propose that if the gun owner is in compliance with his departure city, notifies the proper people, and is allowed to board the plane, then he has not broken any law. When his luggage arrives in New York, it should be both legal and required for the police to take custody of the fire arm, NOT the person. So long as the gun owner isn't allowed to receive their own luggage with the gun in it, they should not have been illegally carrying the weapon.
The cops should just hold it in a vault until he's ready to go home.
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)Claiming ignorance is a sure way to get arrested.
Demit
(11,238 posts)"a Delta ticket agent called the New York-New Jersey Port Authority Police and he was arrested." I wonder why he did that.
And why so snotty a reply to me? I said the guy could have done his own homework.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)I assumed that when a customer checks a gun in his luggage, it must be standard procedure to notify people on the other end to make sure that the responsible gun owner is actually being responsible and following the laws of the state they are traveling to.
I could be wrong about that.
But if I am, it's not mentioned anywhere that I've seen.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)to report guns checked in as baggage to the port police, regardless if the ticket agent thinks it's 100 percent OK or not...
jeff47
(26,549 posts)And the dude at the IA counter knew IA law.
boppers
(16,588 posts)It's his fault he was too ignorant to know he was committing a crime.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Does he sew spare ammo into his leather elbow patches??
freshwest
(53,661 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Would an attorney for a University President truly believe that Delta Airlines would have superior knowledge to that of the University President?
The "duty to warn" concept, although valid for some purposes, is the common basis for frivolous lawsuits which are filed to obtain undeserved settlements.
A way to stop frivolous lawsuits is to stand up to those who bring them.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Response to Blue_Tires (Original post)
guyton This message was self-deleted by its author.
pitohui
(20,564 posts)the guy tried to smuggle a gun into the state most famous for prosecuting people for having a gun
they put a guy in prison for shooting himself in his own ass, c'mon, it is not secret info that you can't bring your gun to nyc
you just can't, that's it, that's not the policy of delta airlines, that's ny for you
i feel for the guy, i do, but if you need your gun, you need to route your trip through atl or iah or something like that
not nyc that's just stupid ass
i should edit this to reflect you're right, it's sickening that they torture people who are under arrest, and it gets me upset too, this was an arrest, the dude wasn't even convicted of anything, and they still treat him like dirt, but i've about given up saying anything about prisoner rights, because it seems like you just can't raise awareness that prisoners should still be treated decently...unfortunately, this lawsuit will focus on unrelated crap like whether delta should have told him blah blah instead of the issue of abuse, because you can't normally sue jails/police officers
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"three problems ..."
Make that four problems-- the dumb-butt didn't know the law. The rest is window dressing.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)else to tell you. Personal responsibility, anyone?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)States could simply abide by the Constitution. Much simpler for everyone that way.
Naw.... to easy.
boppers
(16,588 posts)If he had bothered to legally register his weapon in NYC, he wouldn't be a criminal now.
Hopefully the system works, and if he *had* any kind of carry permit, it will now be revoked, as the perp has demonstrated a willful disregard of the law.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)May I see your First Amendment Permit?
May I see your Thirteenth Amendment licence from a government agency?
boppers
(16,588 posts)So, I choose not to. Nitrocellulose can be tricky. Thankfully, I have many other kinds of paper that *aren't* dangerous enough that they usually require a state license to create/store/handle.
(Yes, paper is legally regulated, likely in all 50 states, based on it's potential dangers).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrocellulose
My first amendment permit is in my wallet. However, it does not allow me to make, and transport, explosive devices and other weapons to wherever I want.
Like paper. Or guns.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Feel free to actually address what I said.
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/artfuldodger.htm
boppers
(16,588 posts)I pointed out why some regulations were sane, even when tossed something silly about "legal papers".
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)But it does say "well regulated militia." Sorry that is part of the 2nd amendment also. The NRA likes to leave off that part.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)"...the right of the people..."
What do you think that means?
Can you cite to a "right of the militia"?
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)If they aren't linked, why put them in the same sentence? And why does the NRA often ignore the reference to a well regulated militia when they quote the 2nd Amendment?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)I don't buy his story, since the ban on guns in NYC has been well publicized.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And warn him about Bloomberg's smoking ordinances?
I call bullshit. Why wouldn't Delta assume the guy, bringing a gun with him, is appropriately licensed in the state he's visiting? The action by the gate agent was likely SOP if it even happened. Delta has no "duty" to babysit his whining ass or warn him that he needs this paperwork or that. He should have done his own due diligence, then he'd have no problems.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)Or am I charged with knowing the traffic laws where I am driving?
askeptic
(478 posts)And you shouldn't be in catch-22. When supreme court decides Constitutional issue, law should be same everywhere - just like on every other amendment
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)Which is what these lawsuits tend to be about.
pitohui
(20,564 posts)teevee is to blame for this, people apparently think you can sue police etc. for false arrest
most of the time, no, you can't
he can't sue nyc no matter how stupid ass their law is so he's suing delta even tho they really aren't to blame here, he's just in pain and doesn't know where to put it
personally if i were him, i'd just blow it off, at least he only got an overnight stay...that's pretty minor for a gun crime in new york
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Yeah, no way can he sue for the actual arrest...
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I remember them being VERY clear about NY laws and warning us not to travel through the state even with a legal MA ccw. Somehow we are supposed to believe a college president did not know this?
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)mrmpa
(4,033 posts)a University President needs to carry a gun..Just asking.
24601
(3,961 posts)worship or assemble peacefully as he sees fit?
boppers
(16,588 posts)Assemble a group of political supporters at his landing gate?
24601
(3,961 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)Rights are not absolutes, they are not guarantees to use as a trump card to evade all other laws.
24601
(3,961 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)Carrying concealed doesn't mean you get to claim the world as your property, to act as you want, no matter where you are. Do it at your home, fine, at an airport, no.
Not surprisingly, this fine point is often lost on people who carry weapons, be they Somali warlords, or terrified suburbanites.
This fine point is *also* often lost on people who carry bibles, as their "spiritual weapon" as well, and preach and otherwise assault those around them.
The common factor is a lack of respect for respect, for the rules, and boundaries, of others.
24601
(3,961 posts)present danger. NY just hasn't caught up with the US Constitution yet. A few appeals may remedy this.
Nor is it a violation for anyone to carry and read a Bible, Koran, Torah or even Evolution of the Species in public places. Speak to someone about the content and your 1st Amendment freedom of speech applies.
But instead hit them over the head with it and it's no longer speech but would constitute criminal battery.
Wouldn't be at all surprised if the Bloomberg moves to ban the above books (except Darwin) after he rounds up the soft drink "would be" criminals. He tends to demonstrate that his views need to be imposed on the rest of us.
boppers
(16,588 posts)If the drink thing offends you so much, buy two drinks.
YOUR LIBERTY IS AT STAKE! GET TWO DRINKS!
24601
(3,961 posts)the original article?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)StateApparatus
(24 posts)You're not in the wild west anymore, Cletus! Here in America, we Yanks think it's a bad idea for people to be wandering around with guns. I'm not sure where you got the idea it was the airline's responsibility to coddle your need to compensate with a loaded pistol, unless it has to do with the amount of cash they might be willing to settle with. That being said, if you break the law in New York, you will be treated like a criminal. Yes, I'm sure on the frontier you're used to reserving that sort of treatment for blacks and Mexicans, but your ethnicity and burning urge to stand your ground don't carry *quite* as much weight in the civilized world.
Sucks to be You,
The Union
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Teh Fail.
But it was mildly amusing. Please try again.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Arguably, it's not really even the most important part.
pitohui
(20,564 posts)the guy was an idiot, and all the world knows you don't bring guns to new york, but let's not pretend the gun was loaded or there was any danger to anyone
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Typical RW gun nut mentality.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)This is one of the big problems with gun ownership in this country. Every state has different laws, some states honor other states laws, some don't. It would be better to have uniform regulations.