Kansas revokes Ann Kristin Neuhaus' medical license over abortion referrals
Source: Pitch Weekly
The latest salvo in the debate over abortion in Kansas is a loud one. Earlier this morning, the Associated Press reported that the Kansas Board of Healing Arts decided to strip Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus of her medical license.
Neuhaus, profiled by The Pitch's Justin Kendall back in November, is a Nortonville doctor who provided second opinion mental health exams on patients seeking late-term abortions from the late Dr. George Tiller. Those consultations, between 1999 and 2006, were required under Kansas law, which has since been changed to remove the mental health exception for late term abortions.
Kansas regulators agreed with an administrative judge that Neuhaus had failed to sufficiently examine 11 patients, who were seeking abortions after 22 weeks, in 2003.
Read more: http://www.pitch.com/plog/archives/2012/06/22/kansas-revokes-ann-kristin-neuhaus-medical-license-over-abortion-referrals
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Someone should write a book.
RKP5637
(67,109 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)EFerrari
(163,986 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)shcrane71
(1,721 posts)It's scary.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)on across the great plains.
Wish I still had my curse inflicting powers.
RitchieRich
(292 posts)...not that it should really matter, but one is less justifiable. It would certainly frame the argument one way or the other.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Most of the cases the board looked at involved very young girls. The youngest was 9. And if you think giving birth is a safe medical procedure for a 9 year old, then we don't have anything more to talk about.
MightyOkie
(68 posts)DiverDave
(4,886 posts)So you think it takes a degree to know that a NINE year old is O.K. to give BIRTH to a CHILD???
the fucks wrong with you?
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)was not mentally disturbed, essentially.
Medically necessary means?
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)But that law has since been revoked.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)yardwork
(61,622 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)In context with the law and why now since this was 9 years ago. Are all of the members of the Kansas Board of Healing Arts mental health doctors capable of even judging the standard in accordance with the then Kansas law. And who did the administrative judge consult regarding the sufficiency of the exams performed by Dr. Neuhaus -- a hand picked doctor or witnesses representing both sides. I presume Dr. Neuhaus will appeal this decision. It sure looks like is was based on politics rather evidence in a court of law.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)She had to verify that severe emotional stress/illness would result from giving birth, making the abortion necessary. She used the diagnostic tool recommended in the DSM. (The doctor who wrote that instrument asked to testify but the board denied his request.)
No all members are not doctors. Dr. Neuhaus's lawyers asked the members who are not doctors to recuse themselves but they refused.
The only 'professional' consultant was a woman from D.C. who is anti-choice. She is a professor at Georgetown, not a doctor. The state paid $100,000 for her testimony.
Yes she will appeal.
The complaint which resulted in this hearing was filed by Cheryl Sullinger from Operation Rescue. Cheryl is a convicted domestic terrorist who served time in prison for conspiracy to bomb an abortion clinic. Her phone number was in Scott Roeder's car when he was arrested after murdering Dr. Tiller.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)I can't see where one thing in this hearing was done properly. It should be a slam dunk for her to get her license back, but in the mean time she cannot practice (I presume). There needs to be consequences to railroading someone in this manner.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)NOT be a good thing to abuse Roe v. Wade and the probabilities are that "mental health" could provide some potential to do so.
I know I'm going to get killed here at DU for saying it, but we should not abort healthy late-term fetuses, for anything but to protect the life of the mother. Has anyone ever heard of pre- or post- partum depression? How do we establish the difference between that stuff and other psycho-pathologies?
I don't know how to resolve mental health issues. Perhaps there should be a way to just take such babies away. If mentally ill mothers can't abide that and can't abide birthing the child, then these mothers need to be identified waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay earlier and informed of the consequences of waiting too long to decide to have an abortion. There needs to be more actual life care for babies born to mothers who are too mentally ill to birth them.
I do wonder about anyone who waits that long to decide whether they want to give birth or not. What's wrong with them? Yes there are more external things that affect these decisions that ARE beyond the potential mother's control, also beyond anything to do with her mental health, but all of that, which is situational and which is intrinsic to the person herself, needs to be established way before we arrive at a point that accepts the abortion of healthy late-term babies with relatively healthy mothers.
Just brainstorming here, all. Please don't attack me. All of this is already encoded in Roe v. Wade anyway and, unless you are like some people I have run into around here who think abortion should be legal all of the way up to and including birthing, you accepted most of these premises when you decided to support Roe v. Wade.
Don't bother to attack me. I won't respond. These are my thoughts on the matter, no I don't think they are sufficient to resolution of the questions raised. Just stating a fact: I and a bunch of other people want NOTHING to do with, and will not support, aborting healthy late-term fetuses with healthy mothers. Period.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)lots of financial and emotional support?
This Doctor had to declare that giving birth would emotionally harm a 9-year-old. 9. Not 29, Nine.
Well, I'm guessing the 9-year-olds take a while to come to grips with what pregnancy means. Heck, they might take a bit to talk with their parents about their pregnancy. Because they're 9.
Hopefully, you'll come to terms with the fact that such women are not seeking abortions. If you find one, you should take a picture. She'll be dining with the Tooth Fairy and Bigfoot.
patrice
(47,992 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Kristin didn't break the law. She followed it to the letter. Dr. Tiller didn't break the law. In case you forgot, they tried to get him too, but he was found innocent in a court of law. Then a month later, they murdered him.
When Scott Roeder was arrested for killing Dr. Tiller, he had Cheryl Sullinger's phone number with him. She is a convicted felon who planned a bombing of a clinic. When she got out of prison, she moved to Wichita and got involved with Operation Rescue. Then she filed a formal complaint with the state board of healing arts to have Kristin's medical license revoked. And the board accepted her complaint. From a convicted felon!!!
This isn't about whether abortion is justified or not. Both Dr. Tiller and Dr. Neuhaus followed the law in place at the time. And Dr. Tiller was murdered. Dr. Neuhaus lost her license.
These abortion opponents are insane and this is about what they do when they don't get their way in court or in the legislature.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)That has ALWAYS been against the law.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)be having a baby!!
quote'
There needs to be more actual life care for babies born to mothers who are too mentally ill to birth them........ DREAM ON!
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Nor the business of the state of Kansas what the mental health of these women was.
However, late term abortions are all medically necessary in Kansas. But go right ahead and defend rw fundies who would deny a 10 year old child an abortion.
P S if you don't want replies to your defense of the indefensible, don't post.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)what do you contribute by posting this? nothing.
You seem to assume that everyone would/should agree with the statement "we should not abort healthy late-term fetuses, for anything but to protect the life of the mother". In fact, it seems to be the basis for your whole post.
But you give no reasoning for why. Can you explain?
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)At least not in Kansas. A woman in good health carrying a healthy fetus can't get a late term abortion. I don't know of any state in the country where that is legal.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)I was curious about the reasoning, anyhow. I have to admit, I know relatively little about abortion. Except in its naturally occuring forms. But I got my degree in biology, and I don't see any clear line where you can say "over here its a small ball of cells, over here its a human being". As far as I can tell its all the same, unless the non-mother part can survive on its own outside the womb. That's kinda where I arbitrarily draw my line.
Sans__Culottes
(92 posts)It should *ONLY* be decided by the woman and her doctor.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Celebration
(15,812 posts)Late term abortions are exceedingly rare, for good reason. Do you think women want a late term abortion? No! These women seeking late term abortions all had exceptional circumstances..................
I heard one man interviewed after Dr. Tiller's death. He and his wife were desperate to have children, and finally she conceived twins, and they were really happy. In the seventh month, they found out that both twins had a condition that would have them in a lot of pain, and then die before they were a year old. It was not diagnoseable earlier. They made the painful decision to abort, and they had to travel to Dr. Tiller to get an abortion, because no other doctor in the country would do it. Most likely this mother fell into the "mental health" category.
That is just ONE story. But everyone has a different one. Please try to realize this. Healthy mothers and babies do NOT seek late term abortions.
Sivafae
(480 posts)Mental health issues are caused by disorders of the brain, which are physically based and thus medical. To separate Medical issues from Mental health issues shows that you are not studied enough to make such decisions. Please leave such decisions to medically trained and educated professionals. People with mental health issues are not moral debased or incapable of morality. They just suffer from brain disorders that result in behavioural problems not physical problems.
And to go further, science has been proving that addiction is also medically based, not morally based.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Who still did medically necessary late term abortions. Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus simply provided the second opinion which had been added as a legal obstacle to the procedures.
In the stories after Dr. Tiller was murdered were many cases of women who desperately wanted their children but who had medical conditions that would kill them if the pregnancy continued. That was why they needed the abortions - to save their lives. Dr. Tiller did not perform abortions late in the pregnancy on a whim, he only did it to save the women's lives. He was not killing "healthy late-term babies with relatively healthy mothers".
The procedures for aborting fetuses that late in pregnancy are seldom taught anymore and there are few doctors with that knowledge and even fewer that can or will use that knowledge because of the legal ramifications. This puts women's lives at risk because religious fanatics have decided to interfere with women's personal health decisions.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)Just once Id like to see a real journalist ask one of those pro-birth jackasses why the hell it is so important for children to be born if they dont want to do a fucking thing for them once theyre on the planet. We were all fetuses at one time, yet now we dont deserve health care.
Women have fought for decades for equal protection,choice,and self determination. RowvWade is being diluted and obstructed by Republicans anxious to please their paymasters.. They are all frightened cowards who really are worthless when we review their sordid behavior and their kickbacks for votes.
People who love to yell that its a taking of a life
why arent you screaming about better gun laws, or murdered women from abuse, or the millions of innocent women and children murdered in Iraq. The list is too long for this comment. The point is, those who yell about taking a life only seem to care about it till birth.
You just put it more nicely than I would have.
The nine year old may have been 8 when conception occurred. This seems HIGHLY uncommon. Life is rotten, messy: break ups, abuse, etc. Still, D&C on an 8 month old fetus? I would actually go along with the Right on this issue if it weren't a transparent first step towards a total ban.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)their claims against her are based upon them violating patients' rights to privacy.
this is a witch hunt.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)It used to be that republicans were merely the opposition. Now they're the enemy.
longship
(40,416 posts)I presume that her medical career is in tatters. All for blind political purpose.
Pitiful people who did this.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Phill Kline raided her house in the middle of the night looking for medical records. Once he got them, they were stored in a Rubbermaid container in one of Phill's assistant's dining rooms. Then Bill O'Reilly got to see them.
Phill will probably lose his license to practice law in Kansas over how he hounded Dr. Neuhaus and shared her medical records. So that's some justice.
But this whole thing just stinks.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I've mentioned this previously, but both my father and his brother, now both deceased, were medical doctors in Kansas prior to Roe v. Wade. Elective abortions for any reason were illegal then, but women did get abortions in Kansas. My father moved us to California in the early 1960s. Pre-Roe abortion laws were similar in both states.
Women quietly passed around phone numbers. Someone who wanted an abortion would call the number, and be told to meet a practitioner at a nondescript location typically in an office park at night or on a weekend when nobody else was around.
The practitioner would be a nurse, a medical student, a veterinarian, or a real medical doctor who needed money. The person would perform the procedure, usually a quick dilation and curettage. The woman was told to go home and never call the number or return to the location again, and to go to a hospital emergency room if she experienced pain, bleeding, or a fever.
That's how things really were before Roe v. Wade in Kansas, and in California.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)She paid him a lot of money to say a pregnancy could kill her. Therapeutic abortions were legal in NY in the 1940s. One of her daughter's was a nurse at the hospital where it was done.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Especially after they've had a few glasses of wine to loosen up.
Everyone that age who went to high school before Roe v. Wade knows someone who died or was permanently injured by a botched illegal abortion.
Everyone that age knows someone, or even has a family member, who got pregnant as an unmarried teenager and was sent away for several months so she could deliver the baby in secret then give it up for adoption. The typical story told to her schoolmates was "She broke a leg."
Most women that age have no problem with legal elective abortions, particularly ones done in the first trimester. After that it gets murkier, but there is near universal agreement that a late-term abortion should be legal to prevent ANY medical harm to a woman, including psychological harm.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)I was maybe 8 or 9 and we had a neighbor who died from an illegal abortion. It was very sad. She left a husband and a couple small children.
In fact, that's how I found out what abortion was. I heard my parents talking about it and I asked them what an abortion was. They wouldn't tell me so I asked my grandmother. She explained it to me. I had just learned the 'facts of life' so it was pretty stunning to learn that someone I know had died because she didn't want to have a baby.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Oh, there were girls who went on "extended vacations" even in NYC Catholic HS. Yep, I know exactly what you mean. I personally knew one girl who went "back to Sweden to visit family". Hmm. I guess she was one of the very lucky ones, if you know what I mean. I graduated HS in 1966, so I cannot say what it was like in the 70s. NYS legalized abortion in 1971. A bit later than my HS years, but I myself went on the Pill in 1969. I have heard other people in other states saying BC was illegal back then. Not where I am from. I remember boys in my apartment building filling up condoms with water and throwing them out the windows down to the sidewalks. That had to be late 50s or early 60s because the boys were my age. Where did they get them if even condoms were illegal? I would guess they raided their Dad's bureau.
kiranon
(1,727 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)It was the 1950s. She was 6 or 7 months pregnant and her baby died in the womb. Her doctor told her she needed an abortion but no one would do it because even with a dead baby, abortion was illegal. So she had to carry it to term and ended up nearly dying from the infection.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)I had friends when I was in high school (before 1973) who met their family doctor in a local motel or motel and he did the abortion there. A few doctors used their own offices after hours.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Good call.
RKP5637
(67,109 posts)the Jesus word in the US and it gets you a lot of mileage, often no questions asked. It's a very dangerous recipe.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)the Mother or her physical or mental health issues. Yes, they are Americas own Taliban.
lynne
(3,118 posts)- it just says "Neuhaus had failed to sufficiently examine 11 patients, who were seeking abortions after 22 weeks, in 2003". It doesn't indicate what is considered sufficient and what was legally required vs what she actually did.
I hope that another article will clarify what went on.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)BlueIris
(29,135 posts)Shame on these misogynist opponents of choice.