*BREAKING* DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigns

[Chicago1980]

Source: The Washington Post

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigns

By Washington Post Staff July 24 at 3:57 PM

The chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee faced growing pressure to resign in the aftermath of the release of thousands of embarrassing internal email exchanges among Democratic officials. Her resignation takes effect at the end of the Democratic National Convention, which begins Monday.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/24/dnc-chair-debbie-wasserman-schultz-resigns/

[Auggie]

1. K&R

[Chakab]

2. Good. Hopefully, Tim Canova will take her House seat, and she can take her rightful place as

a corporate lobbyist.

[MADem]

6. I suspect she'll take Nancy Pelosi's seat before Tim Canova takes hers. nt

[OwlinAZ]

121. I really doubt that

But just heard on NPR that Hillary will give her DWS a place immediately.
Sounds par for the course.

[MADem]

139. What does that mean-- "sounds par for the course?" nt

[Roland99]

129. HA! As if. She's done.

[MADem]

136. They said that about Joe Biden when he was bagged for ripping off Neil Kinnock.

He managed to overcome.

You watch. She will, too.

She has many, many friends in the party and in Congress.

She took one for the team, but she'll be back. Mark my words.

[Roland99]

138. On K Street. Pushing Pay Day Loans

[MADem]

142. No--in the HOUSE. Her peers, who vote on who gets leadership positions. nt

[NWCorona]

4. I see what you did there!

[Omaha Steve]

9. Elect D Tim to US Congress FL-23 DONATE HERE!

Note that this is a positive post in line with the DU TOS!


https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova

[red dog 1]

58. + 1

[BainsBane]

94. He opposes the Iran Nuclear deal

Last edited Mon Jul 25, 2016, 06:35 PM - Edit history (1)

Is that your position? Do you prefer Iran be bombed rather than the existing deal?

[Omaha Steve]

97. I oppose DWS joining the GOP & supporting pay days loans and attacking Senator Warren's work

I want the loan sharks to stop victimizing the poor and destitute. DWS wants to keep things as they are.

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/01/dnc_chair_debbie_wasserman_schultz_joins_hands_with_gop_in_assault_on_elizabeth_warrens_consumer_protection_agency/

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz joins hands with GOP in assault on Elizabeth Warren’s consumer protection agency

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a close ally of Hillary Clinton, is trying to gut regulations on loan sharks
BEN NORTON

TUESDAY, MAR 1, 2016 02:30 PM CST

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, has joined the Republican assault on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren helped create the bureau in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis in order to protect Americans from the malicious practices of the financial industry — particularly banks, toxic mortgage lenders, debt collectors and payday loan companies.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has created pending new regulations in order to protect Americans from payday loan sharks, companies that make enormous profits off of predatory lending, exploiting the poor and uneducated by advertising quick and convenient loans while downplaying the concomitant skyrocketing interest. The bureau hopes to rein in the industry.

Not if the DNC can stop it, however. For Wasserman Schultz has thrown her weight behind the Republican effort to sabotage the bureau’s proposed regulations of the out-of-control predatory lending.

FULL story at link.

[bananas]

119. "I support the full implementation of the Iran nuclear agreement." - Tim Canova

https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/4ozqk9/hi_reddit_im_tim_canova_im_challenging_debbie/d4hijp4

Hi Reddit, I’m Tim Canova. I’m challenging Debbie Wasserman Schultz in the Democratic primary for Florida’s 23rd Congressional district. AMA!

submitted 1 month ago * by TimCanova2016
3568 commentsshare
sorted by: best
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view the rest of the comments ?

[–]This_Is_A_Robbery 2149 points 1 month ago

You've been quoted as saying the Iranian nuclear agreement was full of 'holes'. Can you be more specific? Do you think the Treaty should be repealed?
permalinkembed

[–]TimCanova2016[S] 664 points 1 month ago

First, I'm sorry I did not get to the top question. I’m still new to reddit and I was answering questions as they came in. After 90 minutes on the AMA, I had to get back to the campaign trail (you cannot imagine how demanding this is). I support the full implementation of the Iran nuclear agreement. But yes, I have expressed some criticism of the deal, and I think the State Department could have done a better job negotiating. But now that it has been adopted, of course I support keeping it, as going back would be a big mistake. My main problem with the agreement revolved around the inspection protocols and the timeline of lifting of the sanctions. I think we should have negotiated for inspections that are harder to skirt, and I think that the sanctions and release of frozen assets should have been lifted on a schedule to provide an incentive for Iran to continue its compliance. Granted, I was not in the room, but I don’t think that Obama has been the strongest negotiator. The Affordable Care Act, while partly successful, also has had major problems with costs being so high. A public option could have helped alleviate these problems, and hopefully taken us to a single-payer system like we need. Obama did not negotiate hard for the single-payer system, but instead argued from the middle and got a result to the right— a Republican idea from the 90s. Bottom line, I think it's quite alright to be skeptical of negotiations that are conducted in secret (remember the Trans-Pacific Partnership), but once the Iran deal was adopted, it would be destabilizing to go back. I do not support repeal! I support implementation, and hopefully building on this in negotiations for a general regional disarmament.

[Auggie]

11. I didn't care for the way DWS was running the DNC. We're better off without her.

[calimary]

130. Used to like her. A LOT.

But what changed for both my husband and me was when the CONS shut down the government awhile back, and quite a few pols ON OUR SIDE declared they were going to do without their own paychecks until that disgrace ended. People weren't getting their Social Security checks, their disability benefits, government employees who processed all that stuff couldn't come in to work, the federal government was frozen in place and couldn't operate, and the little guy who DEPENDS on those government services was REALLY getting screwed. Democratic Congresspeople stepped up and announced that they would not take their paychecks while this disaster was going on, and I think I recall some Democratic Senators doing so too. But not Debbie.

DWS refused to take part in that solidarity gesture. She actually joined that Renee Elmers and other CONS who refused to do so. "I need my paycheck, said the North Carolina CON (who was married to a surgeon, btw, so you KNOW she wasn't exactly gonna starve, okay?). And so did others on that side. But not Debbie. SHEESH - just BECAUSE the GOPers were refusing, for that reason ALONE, she should have joined her fellow Dems in passing up their paychecks as long as other Americans farther down the food chain were being left high and dry! But NO! So that started to turn us against her.

Glad she's leaving. I just wish somebody else was stepping in than the entirely underwhelming and dismal Donna Brazile.

[MADem]

137. I still like her--she's the family breadwinner and she was battling breast cancer.

She didn't "marry well." Her husband quit his job as a banker to support his wife, and he's a stay-at-home dad.

So, whatever.

[cannabis_flower]

27. Reporting news isn't

bashing Democrats. Quit crying wolf about nothing. In the last 2 days I have been summoned to jury for 3 or 4 post (I thought it was only supposed to be every so many hours- but I guess with less people available) and all but one of them was bogus.

[red dog 1]

60. + 1

"Crying wolf about nothing" pretty well sums it up..

[avaistheone1]

101. Living democratic principles and values is not easy.

Some people here get upset and want to hide the hypocrisy within the party, and even feel comfortable doing so when the supposed "neutral" party apparatus plan to rig an election.

[nvme]

48. Wasserman Shultz is not the type of dem i feel i am

I am whole-heartedly going to support Tim Canova ( a democratic challenger to her seat). As a DNC Chair she lost more seats than i could count. She has not been an impartial arbiter in this race. She diminished the process by being heavy handed toward Hillary(I support Hillary). So I am not rooting for anyone but dems. you have to report news as news. if she is resigning i say yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!

[lastlib]

50. Is DWS actually a Democrat?

Or is she a corporatist plant??!? . The question is open.

[LuvNewcastle]

55. I've wondered the same thing on

more than a few occasions. She did such a shitty job that it looks like sh's been working for the other side all along. I think she sees progressives as the opposition, not Republicans.

[billhicks76]

68. Her Job Is Done

It's back to corporate deals or maybe even a high level appointment.

[Mike Nelson]

7. Good news...

...they so want her to stay, so Democrats will have a bad convention. They wanted Bernie to "go rogue!" Ben Jealous just endorsed Hillary!

[notadmblnd]

8. Now only thing left is for her to lose her re-election

No worries for little Debbie though, I sure the payday loan people will give her a spot at one of their offices. What kind of money do tellers make these days anyway?

[Omaha Steve]

15. Elect D Tim to US Congress FL-23 DONATE HERE!

Note that this is a positive post in line with the DU TOS!


https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova

[Warren DeMontague]

86. AGREED.

I'm gonna donate to Canova again right now, in honor of DU's fine alert community!

[BainsBane]

95. That's a good way to stand up against the Iran Nuclear deal

Because he opposes it, unlike Wassweman-Schultz. But what does peace matter co pared to personal grudges.

[Warren DeMontague]

96. It's not a personal grudge. She's bad for our brand.

I don't do personal grudges. I know some people do but it's not my bag, baby.

The Iran Deal will not rise or fall based upon FL-23, either way.

[BainsBane]

98. Oh, "brand," of course

Last edited Mon Jul 25, 2016, 09:26 PM - Edit history (1)

I must have realized that this was about advertising. I guess bombing Iran is good for the Democratic brand.

This from people who insist Clinton can't be forgiven for voting for Iraq, and you all are supporting war on Iran with your checkbooks.

[Warren DeMontague]

111. "from people"? What people? "you all"- who all?

I looked in my chair just now, and there's only one dude sitting here.

I didn't say she couldn't be forgiven for the IWR. I've been pretty clear and consistent on it, it was more of a dealbreaker for me in 2008, and that applied equally to Kerry and Edwards as well.

But I forget, I'm not me, I'm a collection of "people", a mass movement of straw folk or some shit. Lol.

I hope you find what you're looking for, I really do. But you're not gonna get it from me.

[MADem]

140. Incredible, isn't it?

smDh.

[bananas]

117. "I support the full implementation of the Iran nuclear agreement." - Tim Canova

https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/4ozqk9/hi_reddit_im_tim_canova_im_challenging_debbie/d4hijp4

Hi Reddit, I’m Tim Canova. I’m challenging Debbie Wasserman Schultz in the Democratic primary for Florida’s 23rd Congressional district. AMA!

submitted 1 month ago * by TimCanova2016
3568 commentsshare
sorted by: best
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view the rest of the comments ?

[–]This_Is_A_Robbery 2149 points 1 month ago

You've been quoted as saying the Iranian nuclear agreement was full of 'holes'. Can you be more specific? Do you think the Treaty should be repealed?
permalinkembed

[–]TimCanova2016[S] 664 points 1 month ago

First, I'm sorry I did not get to the top question. I’m still new to reddit and I was answering questions as they came in. After 90 minutes on the AMA, I had to get back to the campaign trail (you cannot imagine how demanding this is). I support the full implementation of the Iran nuclear agreement. But yes, I have expressed some criticism of the deal, and I think the State Department could have done a better job negotiating. But now that it has been adopted, of course I support keeping it, as going back would be a big mistake. My main problem with the agreement revolved around the inspection protocols and the timeline of lifting of the sanctions. I think we should have negotiated for inspections that are harder to skirt, and I think that the sanctions and release of frozen assets should have been lifted on a schedule to provide an incentive for Iran to continue its compliance. Granted, I was not in the room, but I don’t think that Obama has been the strongest negotiator. The Affordable Care Act, while partly successful, also has had major problems with costs being so high. A public option could have helped alleviate these problems, and hopefully taken us to a single-payer system like we need. Obama did not negotiate hard for the single-payer system, but instead argued from the middle and got a result to the right— a Republican idea from the 90s. Bottom line, I think it's quite alright to be skeptical of negotiations that are conducted in secret (remember the Trans-Pacific Partnership), but once the Iran deal was adopted, it would be destabilizing to go back. I do not support repeal! I support implementation, and hopefully building on this in negotiations for a general regional disarmament.

[Chicago1980]

10. Ben Jealous, former president of the NAACP has just endorsed Hillary Clinton on MSNBC.

He said now that DWS is gone, he will endorse Clinton/Kaine.

[MADem]

141. He gave a speech endorsing, and got booed from some idiots in the hall.

So I guess people are "loved" only if they say what haters want them to say.

Anyone who thinks Donna Brazile will run things terribly differently don't know her too well. She's the ultimate party insider.

[elmac]

12. Has long as DU allows posts that bash Bernie supporters

They will have to live with a president Trump.

[OwlinAZ]

122. Daily Kos is the same

[Cobalt Violet]

13. Ding Dong!

[brewens]

14. Watch out for that door! n/t

[coyote]

16. One down

One to go.

[Chicago1980]

17. Donna Brazile will take over as interim chair.

[OwlinAZ]

123. Brazile is much the same as DWS

[Ellipsis]

18. And there you have it...

[mahannah]

19. Today is not too soon.

[4lbs]

20. MSNBC is reporting that Donna Brazile will be the interim DNC chair through the election.

Ben Jealous likes Donna Brazile.

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

24. Isn't she an MSNBC commentator at times?

Will DNC Chair impact her television appearances?

[Zen Democrat]

32. CNN

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

36. That's what I get for mindless channel-changing.

As long as I don't mix up MSNBC and FOX, I'll be ok.

[SwankyXomb]

81. That's getting harder to do these days

Flipping between the all news channels is starting to look like the end of Animal Farm.

[tiredtoo]

21. Good News here

The payday lenders will not like it but hey they still have tons of Republicans in their pocket.

[caballojm]

22. So sad :(

In lieu of an emoji for crocodile tears, I'll go with this one:

[Botany]

23. She has been a train wreck into a dumpster fire

How many seats in the House, the Senate, and State Governors wer lost
under her?

[Chicago1980]

25. The party in power usually loses seats during midterms.

I'll blame lazy democratic voters who seemingly forget elections are every two years.

[nvme]

53. seems those mid term elections are perpetual

we have neither house or senate

[KPN]

120. Are you kidding? We got absolutely clobbered in the mid-terms!

It was way more than usual -- it was inept at best.

[hay rick]

26. good riddance. nt

[liberalmuse]

28. It was the right thing to do.

Put this behind us and move on, although Trump trolls will keep this raging on social media for as long as they can.

[Yo_Mama]

93. Yes - this story needs to burn itself out. n/t

[elmac]

29. Too little too late

with all the Bernie bashing DU lets on this site they are guaranteeing a president Trump in Nov.

[Zen Democrat]

40. I'm not an anti-information Democrat. DWS should resign today.

[Mary Mac]

77. well luckily du is not the great oz

Nt.

[emulatorloo]

88. Strawman argument.

Relatively little Bernie bashing these days.

[jalan48]

30. Great to hear. Now she can go back to shilling for the payday loan industry full time.

[pangaia]

31. Senator Bernard Sanders was right about all this 6,7,8 months ago.

DUH !!!!!

[OwlinAZ]

125. True. Have yet to hear from MSNBC and CNN any apology for their complicity

in the anti-Sanders campaign.

[pangaia]

131. Never will.

It's on to the next 'fire, plane crash, sex scandal,' whatever sells advertising.

[leftofcool]

33. So, some people got their pound of flesh.

Good for them.

[Ohioblue22]

128. Yea they wanted someone's head on a pike. I wouldn't be good enough for some though

[rateyes]

34. I hope she is smart enough to stay the hell

away from Philly this week. Time for a vacation on a secluded island in the Pacific, Debbie.

[a la izquierda]

35. Tragic.

[elmac]

37. Great!

Now if we could get DU support team to stop being so biased against Bernie.

[totodeinhere]

38. I think this had to happen. The party needs to put this distraction behind it.

n/t

[KPN]

124. "Distraction" -- now there's a euphemism!

[totodeinhere]

132. Well excuse me for trying to put the best face on this situation that I can.

We have an election to win or our country will be in a deep crisis.

[KPN]

135. Keep in mind it's a distraction of its (DNCs) own making.

The perception was there, the emails confirmed the perception, shit happened ... and will continue to happen unless the Party finds a way to build a bridge QUICKLY! Maybe the speakers tonight (Warren, Merkley) can help that along.

[RKP5637]

39. Excellent!!! K&R!!! n/t

[Paladin]

41. Good. (nt)

[FarPoint]

42. Okay...

So NOW we can focus on our DNC Convention Goals, Unify and Beat Trump/ Pence...

No more crying....!!!!

[choie]

43. Let's not worry about Debbie

..I'm sure she'll find a position in the Clinton administration, as was surely already promised prior to the beginning of the primary season.

[Jemmons]

92. Not so easy to predict how good her chances are

The Clinton team might view her as toxic waste.
Or they might not give a rats ass about the left wing that despise her.

[mr_liberal]

44. She'll get a big job in the Clinton admin. nm

[Auggie]

54. Yes, (sigh) ... a bigger, better job.

[PoliticalMalcontent]

75. If that happens I'm gonna be pissssed.

Pissed has been my standard state lately though it seems.

[coco77]

45. OK..

[Loki]

46. Julian Asange and Putin win!

Aren't you all happy?

[Chicago1980]

59. Oh Good Grief!!!

People wanted her gone before any leaks occurred.

[FailureToCommunicate]

65. With a user name like that, maybe she's just messing with you.

[coco77]

90. I am ..

I don't give a damn about the people you mentioned. I have said many times she needed to go ,should she stay to add to the women power.

[Ruby the Liberal]

47. Excellent news

People who side with payday loan sharks (and vote to protect them from CFPB regulations) have no business in a seat of power in this party. Good riddance.

[Mister Twilight]

49. I don't think she did a good job, either

But I'm not gonna risk providing ammo to the Trumpoglodytes by shitting on her!

[MisterP]

76. 12 Governors, 13 Senators, 69 Reps, 913 state seats, and left with 26% of the electorate

she's been giving the Trumpettes ammo for 6 years running now

[PoliticalMalcontent]

78. Good rule of thumb. Be less concerned about other what other people do/think.

Be more concerned about doing the right things.

I applaud you for not wanting to be mean to people though.

[benld74]

51. I used to like her, what happened over the years?

[Android3.14]

52. Well that's something, at least.

Thank you, whoever told her to fall on her sword.

[R0ckyRac00n]

56. An appropriate step

at this point. Onward and upward.

[stopbush]

57. Didn't President Obama appoint her to that post?

If so, not a good mark for him today.

[Equinox Moon]

61. Wise decision!

[CTyankee]

62. Change happens...

[kacekwl]

63. Great news

now let's win this.

[red dog 1]

64. It's about time!

[Helen Borg]

66. Interfering this way with the election process

Should be a felony. These findings put in doubt the legitimacy of the entire Democratic primary. This is a fact.

[backscatter712]

67. FINALLY!!! The house drops!

She should have been out on her ratfucking ass months ago!

[runaway hero]

69. bye!

[warrprayer]

70. This is SERIES!

[jalan48]

71. This sounds like a bad cop and the police union.

[lark]

72. I'm basically happy about this.

She needed to leave for a whole host of reasons. They can certainly do better than her. I think Dean did a good job, I wouldn't mind having him back in the saddle.

[randr]

73. Very good news and the acknowledgement of what many here have been saying all along

With the worst DNC chairperson in history out of the way it is time for Hillary and crowd to join with Bernie and crowd to get on with the most important presidential election in history.

[ornotna]

74. About time

Now that I have my pound of flesh I guess it's time to stop all the whingeing.

[JoePhilly]

79. Let the search for new outrages COMMENCE!!!!

[Funtatlaguy]

80. I'm really disappointed DWS hasn't been praised

for the great job she did in the midterms......oh wait.

She is and was a terrible Chairman!
So glad she's gone!

[Boomer]

82. Long overdue

Her legislative record alone should have resulted in her departure. But it's over, finally, and we can look forward to someone who has the interests of the Democratic Party at heart and isn't so protective of the re-election of Florida Republicans.

[Still In Wisconsin]

83. Good riddance to bad trash. Now, I hope she loses her primary. n/t

[Walk away]

84. I'm a Hillary Supporter but I've never been a big fan of DWS or how she has been running the DNC.

What the hell is wrong with her? She really needs to GTF out of town. Why is she waiting until the end of the week?

Hillary would have won by a long shot anyway but this could have been a much happier primary without her histrionics. Bernie was just as guilty of the unnecessary drama, but that was part of his campaign meme. She could have done better, she didn't, so go!

[runaway hero]

91. Thank You

I appreciate this, I wish others felt the same.

[Warren DeMontague]

85. Good. She's bad for the brand and her positions- like supporting jail for medical marijuana- are

onerously out of step with both our party and our nation.

note to jury: This is a factual statement, based in objective reality.

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/on-medical-marijuana-debbie-wasserman-schultz-sounds-like-a-republican-6544176

[emulatorloo]

87. Hell yeah!

[whopis01]

89. Mission Accomplished

No more use for her I guess.

[The empressof all]

99. Meh...Historically don't the Chairs usually resign after a Presidential election.

She doesn't give a rat's ass IMO.... She will probably coast into a re-elected house seat...get some cushy committee assignments and live to do her dirty dealings another day. She's been slimey for a long time. She's not the kind of Democrat I support Thank you Very Much so when she assumed the Chair I didn't expect much in terms of integrity.

Just sent another 20 bucks to Tim Canova and I don't live in Florida! You can too!

https://timcanova.com/

[avaistheone1]

100. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should not be serving in government.

She has violated the trust placed in her.

Good riddance Debbie.

[The empressof all]

103. Well Our Candidate doesn't agree with us --She hired her again

Clinton responds to party chair's resignation on Sunday by thanking "longtime friend" for her service at DNC and immediately naming her as honorary chair of her own campaign


http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/07/24/mission-accomplished-dnc-clinton-hires-wasserman-schultz-top-post

[progressoid]

114. Oh that's just great.

[Blue Idaho]

104. Thats for her district to decide.

We have these things called elections where the people get to decide if they are happy with how their elected official is discharging their duties. It's not up to the DU oligarchy to decide.

[avaistheone1]

105. Yes and the DNC has these things called rules which she violated.

And if she runs her local congressional oligarchy like her DNC oligarchy
DWS should be out on her butt pronto.

[Blue Idaho]

106. So says you

If your not a member of her district then you don't get to vote on the matter. That makes your opinion no better or worse than mine - and certainly no more meaningful on the outcome of her re-election.

FWIW - I have never been a big DWS fan. But as far as her job in congress - that's up to her district to vote on - not DU. That's democracy in action.

[avaistheone1]

109. So says I!!!

Oh yes that is my opinion. I think that is pretty clear.
We have those little things too.

And for the record bless the court of public opinion. Hopefully will influence the locals to get rid of that loser aka DWS.

n/t

[Blue Idaho]

110. You know what they say about opinions...

Including both Yours and Mine... Long live representative democracy.

[avaistheone1]

116. Update: It appears the locals are not happy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/25/debbie-wasserman-schultz-just-had-a-disastrous-moment-at-the-democratic-national-committee/?k88a88a8a

[deutsey]

102. Good riddance. Looooong overdue.

[TryLogic]

107. Resignation should be effective immediately. I assume she gets her travel and accommodations paid

for by staying on until after the convention.

[liberalhistorian]

108. Finally! It should have happened

months ago, but certainly better late than never. She has to be one of the worst DNC heads ever.

[ozone_man]

112. Donna Brazille is just as bad.

We live in bizarro world. Replace one third way Democrat with another. Yuk!

[The Green Manalishi]

113. And don't let the door hit ya where the Good Lord split ya.

Bless her heart. I'm sure she has *no* job prospects at all nor any corporate contacts, poor thing.
/sarc

[Raster]

115. 'Bout flippin' time!

[lonestarnot]

118. Adios seester.

[bananas]

126. Too little, too late. She is an embarrassment to the Democratic Party. nt

[Karen_J]

127. timing

I wonder if this is entirely about the leaked posts, or if Bernie secured this deal in advance of his Hillary endorsement. We'll probably never know for sure.

[paparush]

133. aaaaaaaand.....

She immediately joins the HRC campaign staff.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/24/debbie-wasserman-schultz-immediately-joins-hillary/

HRC's hubris is absolutely unmatched. Distance herself from a scandal? Hell no. Put her on the payroll

[Bettie]

134. Good

Hoping they'll get someone better in that job.