Oregon court reverses DUI conviction of wheelchair user
Source: Associated Press
Updated 12:54 pm, Thursday, December 29, 2016
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) The Oregon Court of Appeals has reversed the conviction of a wheelchair user who had been found guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicants.
James Greene of Waldport was arrested in November 2012 after entering a crosswalk in a motorized wheelchair and striking the side of a moving pickup. Police determined he was impaired by alcohol and drugs, and a jury convicted him of drunken driving.
In his appeal, Greene argued that he should have been considered a pedestrian, not subject to the DUI law.
The state disagreed, pointing to a law that treats motorized wheelchairs like bicycles when they are driven on bike lanes.
Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Oregon-court-reverses-DUI-conviction-of-10824784.php
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)What are they going to do? Take away his wheelchair for a year? Find a more appropriate charge and make him pay for the damage. Problem solved. If he lives in Waldport, he needs drugs and alcohol. It's pretty much mandatory in that area.
Lithos
(26,403 posts)If he can't function on the street, I would liken it to PI which is the other charge. However, not sure PI can warrant the person taking some sort of sobriety program.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)monitor him.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)Home confinement? Ahh, no thanks. Don't want you anywhere near the justice system.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)I'm not saying for years but maybe a few weeks other than for doctors appointments, job and or going to the grocery store once or twice a week.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)squiregeek
(5 posts)As the article reads, the guy was in a crosswalk. Apparently the truck driver decided to drive across it with a person in it. Under Oregon law, it doesn't matter whether he is walking or using a wheelchair (powered or not). In the crosswalk, he has the right-of-way. Too often, motorists forget that.
Johnathan146
(141 posts)If I have a green light while driving a car, then the crosswalk will say "don't walk" and the car is not required to yield right of way.
Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)The pedestrian can be cited, but the driver is still required to yield.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)in Ohio and Texas. In both, the pedestrian has the right of way.
Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)And it's the law everywhere. Although I understand they're considering suspending the law in most city financial districts during rush-hour because the pedestrians interpret the 'Don't Walk' sign to mean, "Don't Walk, Run".
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Backwoodsrider
(764 posts)but if he is categorized as an intoxicated driver he is responsible for the damage to the truck
its always about money
And Walport is great right now its sunny almost 60 whats the weather like where you are at
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)This December has been abnormally warm.
tblue37
(65,403 posts)realize we are "neighbors." (I live in Lawrence.) nt
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)wincest
(117 posts)those motorized wheelchairs are slow, i can walk faster.
nobody was in any danger, even if he had hit a pedestrian. all it would do is leave a minor bruise. i been hit by a few cranky old timers, i mutter a few colorful words and limp away.