Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 01:25 PM Jan 2017

Out of power, state Dems frustrated with national committee

Source: Associated Press


MONDAY, JAN 2, 2017 11:00 AM EST

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Democrats around the country are demanding change from a national committee they say has focused too heavily on the White House at the expense of governorships, legislatures and state party operations.

“It’s got to be helping us organize in our states to be able to build that power at the state legislative level,” Michigan Democratic Party Chair Brandon Dillon said of the Democratic National Committee, currently searching for a new leader. “We’ve lost governorships and state legislatures at a rate that is pretty astounding.”

DNC members gather in February to elect a new chairman, with five candidates running so far, each pledging to rebuild from the ground up. Money from the DNC to state parties has been inconsistent during President Barack Obama’s tenure and, in most states, less than it was under former chairman Howard Dean. Party chairs say that’s resulted in fewer staff members and training programs, a change felt particularly in Republican-leaning states. State leaders also say Obama’s grassroots group Organizing for Action has functioned more like competition than a partner.

Beginning in 2017, Republicans will hold 33 governorships and fully control legislatures in 25 states, as well as the Congress and presidency. During Obama’s two terms in office, the party lost more than 1,000 seats at the state and national level.

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2017/01/02/out-of-power-state-dems-frustrated-with-national-committee/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
2. It occurred to me decades ago but few wanted to listen as they were focused on
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 02:29 PM
Jan 2017

winning the Whitehouse which I never understood because while the President is important the state level is even more so especially in states vulnerable to gerrymandering which the Republicans have exploited.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
3. It will shake out over the next few months. I wish salon & rags similar * would get off Ds backs.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 02:39 PM
Jan 2017

* "Headline News" creating media rags. rags who buy media from Reuters to create news stories for aggregate message boards like DU.

CrispyQ

(36,462 posts)
6. It will not 'shake out over the next few months.'
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:39 PM
Jan 2017

The dems have neglected state level politics & now the government is under almost total GOP control. They lied, cheated & stole to get this power & they aren't letting it go easily. Look for them to work hard - by hook or by crook - to turn a few more state governments, so they can call a constitutional convention.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
7. I meant the DNC 'leader' . I keep checking who people like Obama, Warren, Sanders suggest
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:47 PM
Jan 2017

I signed the petition Sanders had months ago, 4 million verified sigs on his petition.

CrispyQ

(36,462 posts)
9. Opps, my bad.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:56 PM
Jan 2017

I was alarmed by this:

During Obama’s two terms in office, the party lost more than 1,000 seats at the state and national level.

I think DNC leadership should consist of a team from different regions. The dems need to examine why it is Michael Moore called this election in September, while dem leadership went into election day confident of a win.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
10. article covers M Moores predictions pretty well. I was amazed how on the money "Trumpland" was.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:59 PM
Jan 2017

MMs interviews with the rustbelt trump voters explained a lot of why.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
13. Why do you assume they wouldn't?
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 04:33 PM
Jan 2017

What, exactly, are you thinking the state Dems are calling for that would mean NOT listening to those of you who vote for Hillary?

Most of those state Dems voted for her, too.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
5. Been on the no we can not help you phone
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:03 PM
Jan 2017

calls with the DNC and the DCCC. But that comes with the territory. When you take on a Incumbent with mega bucks,the Washington Social Club will blow you off.

ananda

(28,859 posts)
11. This is why I will never understand or forgive Obama ..
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:59 PM
Jan 2017

.. for firing Howard Dean.

Ever since, we have had NO fifty state strategy.

LiberalFighter

(50,912 posts)
12. Why are they complaining now?
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 04:29 PM
Jan 2017

Every state has DNC members along with party chair and vice chair that are part of the DNC.

States and local parties need to take some responsibility too.

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
14. I'm done sending anyone any money
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 04:46 PM
Jan 2017

Until I see some sort of strategy for increasing Democratic office holders across the board.

crazycatlady

(4,492 posts)
15. In 2017 we have a chance to pick up one more trifecta
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 05:06 PM
Jan 2017

The entire statehouse in Trenton (NJ) is up. Right now Dems control 2/3 and we have a termed out VERY unpopular GOP governor.

As far as other legislative seats--- until most of them are up in 2018, we gotta take advantage of special elections.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Out of power, state Dems ...