Gen. James Mattis Refuses to Say if he's Against Female and LGBT Service Members
Source: Mediaite
by David Bixenspan | 1:37 pm, January 12th, 2017
On Thursday, during Gen. James Mattiss confirmation hearing for Secretary of Defense, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-New York) challenged him on comments he had made in the past. Specifically, she tried to quiz him on past comments about women, homosexuals, and transgender men and women in the military, but when he responded, he wasnt giving direct answers to her questions.
Gillibrand asked Mattis if he stood by his comments that mixing both genders in the military has never worked anywhere in world history, comparing it to mixing different types of eros. Senator, I was not in a position to go back into government when I made those statements, the retired general replied. Im coming in with the understanding that I lead the Department of Defense, and if someone brings mea a problem, then Ill look at it, but Im not coming in looking for problems. Im looking for ways to get the department so that its at its most lethal
stance. In summation, he said he was looking at military readiness.
When asked directly if he no longer believes that men and women serving together is a problem, Mattis just said that we need to train our leaders so they could handle things that come from a policy that decided this down. GIllibrand then followed up by asking if, in light of comments he made in his book and on the subsequent book tour, if he feels that openly serving homosexuals along with women in combat units is undermining our force. Like rarlier, he said that he was only prepared to do anything if a problem was brought to his attention, but when Gillibrand asked if he thought it was undermining our lethality, he said he didnt care about two consenting adults and who they go to bed with.
Asked if that was a no, he gave a long response that didnt answer the question. When Gillibrand tried to get a clearer response for the record, her time expired.
###
Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/mattis-refuses-to-say-if-hes-against-female-and-lgbt-service-members/
onecaliberal
(32,854 posts)samir.g
(835 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)But when it went to the whole senate, I never heard if the exemption passed. If he doesn't get the exemption, he's done.
Eugene
(61,885 posts)The House votes as early as tomorrow.
http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2017-01-12/senate-approves-waiver-to-allow-james-mattis-as-pentagon-chief
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)sdfernando
(4,935 posts)Make a statement saying: "OK, so that is a NO".
That way they have to either acquiesce or they have to speak up and then it isn't a no, or a qualified no..either way you have your answer.
SteamAddict
(53 posts)"He argued that if women are allowed in combat units, the mission will be compromised by eros, or sexual desire."
He is a typical throwback bigoted thug.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/trumps-defense-secretary-push-women-back-combat/
"It sayze in tha Bible!"
BigDemVoter
(4,150 posts)Hateful motherfucker.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)Another person completely unfit to hold a dog catchers license.
niyad
(113,301 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)Mattis, 66, was grilled by members of the Senate Armed Services Committee during a confirmation hearing about his past comments that questioned whether integrated military service could be successful. The retired general said Thursday that he would follow the Pentagon policy changes made in December 2015 that allow women into combat occupational specialties, after years of front-line duty in other positions.
I have no plan to oppose women in any aspect of our military, Mattis said.
https://www.stripes.com/news/us/mattis-backs-women-in-combat-nato-alliance-1.448599