Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 04:47 AM Jul 2012

Iran website: Tehran should make nuclear ship fuel

Source: Associated Press

Iran should enrich uranium to new levels close to weapons-grade to produce fuel for proposed nuclear-powered oil tankers, a conservative Iranian news website said Monday.

Iran currently has no such ships. The commentary by Mashreghnews.ir, which reflects the views of some Iranian hardliners, comes after a parliamentary committee prepared a bill that would require the Islamic Republic to design nuclear-powered merchant ships and provide them with nuclear fuel.

<snip>

"To reach nuclear propulsion, the country's nuclear industry inevitably has to upgrade the level of nuclear enrichment to the average level needed for new marine reactors, and that will be 50 to 60 percent," Mashreghnews.ir said.

The website said this will be an "effective step to thwart sanctions and make them ineffective."

<snip>

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jxjBaiXFNUlXhAQQn960RomeVDVw?docId=570956340200440b95ef61fba1a3031e

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran website: Tehran should make nuclear ship fuel (Original Post) bananas Jul 2012 OP
Nuclear-powered oil tankers? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #1
Which is a ridiculous excuse, that would be aimed at producing weapons grade material muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #2

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
2. Which is a ridiculous excuse, that would be aimed at producing weapons grade material
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:10 AM
Jul 2012

No country has ever produced a nuclear-powered tanker. It's not worth it. It's more or less an oxymoron - oil tankers, by definition, go where fuel oil is easily available, and it's not as if you can say "we're stopping global warming" when you're transporting oil. Many ports might ban the ships (for instance, in Britain, there is discussion about what would be done if Scotland gained independence, and threw out the nuclear submarine base at Faslane. One geographically suitable site is Milford Haven, but people point out it's already a major tanker port and oil refinery, and they don't like the mixture of that and nuclear). The only civil ships that have kept with nuclear propulsion (as opposed to a couple of experimental ones) are Russian ice-breakers, and their role has justification - voyages of unknown duration, far from refuelling ports.

For regular ships, nuclear power isn't worth it. But they've noticed that naval propulsion typically uses highly enriched uranium. This is the kind of move that says "yea, we are developing nuclear weapons, but just need the tiny final fig leaf before we've announced we've perfected them".

As an example of the status of nuclear-powered ships, consider the only one the Russians are still running:

After entering service Sevmorput was denied entry to four major ports in the Soviet Far East. Authorities in Nakhodka, Vostochny, Magadan and Vladivostok refused to accept the two-month-old ship into their ports due to popular protests. In addition the harbour workers also refused to load or unload any cargo or provide any port services due to fears of radiation leakage. This was caused by uncertainty about the safety of the ship's nuclear propulsion system and the shadow of the Chernobyl disaster only few years earlier. The local newspapers had also reported a four-minute emergency onboard the nuclear icebreaker Rossiya only a week before the arrival of Sevmorput. The ship was finally allowed to dock at Vladivostok on 13 March 1989.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevmorput


When popular protest kept a Soviet ship out of ports in the Soviet Union, you know that there'd be protests about any Iranian one.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran website: Tehran shou...