In Amended Libel Lawsuit, Melania Trump Now Includes Hooker Statement from NY Times Reporter
Source: Law Newz
First Lady Melania Trump has abandoned her claim that she planned to cash in on her First Lady brand to sell apparel, accessories, shoes, jewelry, cosmetics, hair care, skin care and fragrance from her White House perch.
Melania Trumps lawyer, Charles Harder, filed an amended complaint on Friday in her New York libel lawsuit against the Daily Mail, deleting the First Ladys claims that she planned to make millions from her White House fame described in her first version of the lawsuit. But, in this suit, she did include a statement from a New York Times reporter who called her a hooker.
Gone from the new version of the lawsuit are the First Ladys earlier allegations that the Daily Mails false story deprived her of a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, as an extremely famous and well-known person
to launch a broad-based commercial brand in multiple product categories.
But Melania Trump did not drop her claim that she is entitled to $300 million in damages from the online tabloid. She still seeks $150 million in damages in her defamation claim and an additional $150 million in damages in her claim for intentional infliction for emotional distress.
Read more: http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/in-amended-libel-lawsuit-melania-trump-now-includes-statement-from-ny-times-reporter-who-called-her-hooker/
ck4829
(35,077 posts)Hugin
(33,164 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)without caring so much that he'd rob her blind in the divorce.
Or they might already have an agreement to remain "married" but separate until Barron's older.
ToxMarz
(2,169 posts)This is her walking away nest egg.
tblue37
(65,409 posts)illegally and was able to force her to accept even less in a prenup--but I'd guess she would consider $2 million too paltry a sum to live on, so she would consider that walking away with "nothing."
mdbl
(4,973 posts)if she wins, she can leave him and live in comfort with a guy she really wants.
Response to mdbl (Reply #15)
Post removed
underpants
(182,834 posts)OR both.
He loved suing or threatening to sue people (often people with no means to fight him) but now he can't. His mentor Roy Cohn was his bloodthirsty lawyer who loved taking it to people. Donald now has to rely on the DoJ and its limited resources and cost/benefit analysis. This lawsuit is a bad idea on so many levels but that's never stopped him before.
Hugin
(33,164 posts)"I will never say she 'used to be' a Hooker."
Did Betty say that about Melania or just in general?
Hugin
(33,164 posts)She said it about Third-ladies in general.
From teh Farcebook:
"Goodness, the Thénardiers of the White House are in uproar! First, Melania (who is NOT currently a former hooker) sued because she couldnt capitalize on being FLOTUS-in-Absentia, to peddle former-visaless-model fragrances and 2 kt. ankle bracelets."
underpants
(182,834 posts)Love it
"NOT currently a former hooker"!
underpants
(182,834 posts)She wants the Daily Mail to pay her for every time someone says it or might say it?
Drop it Melania. YOU are keeping this alive not anyone else.
Maybe she needs the money to take off from her "miserable" life as First um Lady
forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)Of the "Stickham, Harder, and Goode" firm.
groundloop
(11,519 posts)it would have been a constant, never ending battle. Definitely a huge difference in graciousness and class between the current and former First Ladies (I was going to say White House Occupants but Melania refuses to live in Washington).
underpants
(182,834 posts)and Michelle had no plans to cash in on being FLOTUS.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)greymattermom
(5,754 posts)Does trophy wife count?
underpants
(182,834 posts)but it's the same.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)In the scrum, try to "hook" the ball with your foot while preserving your ACL and cartilage from both team-mates and the opposing team.
Historic NY
(37,451 posts)Rupert, Rupert, Rupert.
Bear Creek
(883 posts)Sorry what goes around comes around. Fair game
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)We'll be more than happy to see your previous "business attangements" plastered all over every paper in the country. In exquisite detail. And we look forward to you having to give evidence about them. And perjure yourself.
slingsam
(370 posts)What a plunging neckline!!!
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)So true.
This trick is just as scummy, filthy and money-grubbing as her p***y-grabbing husband.
no_hypocrisy
(46,130 posts)I'm pretty sure that her award won't be $450 million, but reduced to some nominal, symbolic amount.
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)Like, say, what her going rate was before HE came along??
no_hypocrisy
(46,130 posts)The whole concept of defamation is your reputation is irreparably damaged. If the court or the jury finds that technically the media lied about Melania but her brand didn't really suffer, they award *something* but not a lot.
freedomrock1970
(31 posts)Let her prove she isn't a hooker, let's see where the income came from, if not from selling her soul to the Great Plumpkin.
paleotn
(17,931 posts)...If that's not prostitution, I don't know what is. If the shoe fits, you Slovenian piece of slim, fucking wear it!!!
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Tanuki
(14,919 posts)used a bullhorn to address a crowd adjacent to a polling place during the primaries.....imagine the hoopla if he had also poll danced!
paleotn
(17,931 posts)..would hit an all time high.
paleotn
(17,931 posts)ain't mi strong sewt.
Response to demmiblue (Original post)
Post removed
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)freedom, yeah?
lark
(23,121 posts)I have been a feminist since I was old enough to make up my own mind about my beliefs. I have marched, burned bras, burned draft cards, supported abortion rights by helping people get to NY when it was still illeagal in FL. Melania is a horrible greedy person who hurts others for her own personal financial gain. One of the papers she's suing issued a full apology, but that's not good enough for her, no she wants the $$. Just like she wanted to cash in on being FLOTUS but had to amend her lawsuit because it's illegal. However, the fact that she expects to cash in by rights shows how shallow, self-serving and uncaring about the law and our country she is. She freaking wore a purse with a British flag on it to her husband's nomination as repug candidate. She says she's coming out against cyberbullying when her husband and she are the biggest bullies of all. She's low class porno star and I said all this without using any woman centric insults. However, she is a woman, married to a horrible person who treats her like dirt, and she stays for $$. That's golddigging at it's worst and her treatment of the media shows she' a conniving bitch.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)to think of more liberties they may use. Think about that.
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)Live at tRump Tower, too. Her father was a member of the Communist Party in good standing prior to coming over here. Is he the connection between Agent Orange and Vlad?? With all the cosmetic surgery, she is entering into the Cat Woman range.
lark
(23,121 posts)Takers, fakers and users all.
bullimiami
(13,099 posts)cstanleytech
(26,299 posts)Vinca
(50,279 posts)Tanuki
(14,919 posts)so it would just be more he said, she said. Sad!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)the cheap pretty whores they use and toss away.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)If you watched Rachel Maddow on Friday, you would have known that her Attorneys are the same ones that Hulk Hogan used to take down Gawker. This is a war on the media and she's leading it. They're trying to muzzle and send a chill down the collective spine of all Media.
Tanuki
(14,919 posts)jetcat
(37 posts)And with the removal of the her "trinkets for the people" claim, her attorney may have handed the defense a pretty compelling argument that actual damages are a chimera, leaving her with token damages. While untenable defense costs can be an effective muzzle, the defendants here are pretty well-heeled, and a token damage award won't do much to muzzle them in particular.
Panich52
(5,829 posts)Rachel Maddow inferred driving Daily out of biz was goal since she didn't accept retraction & apology and hired lawyer who intentionally bankrupted Gawker. Now dragging NYT into it as punishment f/ truthfully reporting on hubby's idiocy?
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)Given Melania's photos and the fact that the MSM actually treated her with respect, I would think she would not be forcing this issue - why get into that argument even though she was not an escort.