Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 04:55 PM Jul 2012

Iraq Says Rebels in Syria Control Border Posts

Source: NYT


BAGHDAD – Iraqi government officials said Thursday evening that Syrian rebels had wrested control of all four border checkpoints between Iraq and Syria, and that additional Iraqi forces were being sent to the border.

One top government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the border crossings, in Anbar and Nineveh Provinces, were closed and that Iraqi border forces had witnessed the executions of several Syrian army soldiers at the hands of the Free Syrian Army rebels and the raising of the rebels’ flag.

The acting minister of interior, Adnan al-Assadi, was quoted by Agence France-Presse as saying that Iraqi forces had witnessed the executions of 22 Syrian soldiers. Mr. Assadi could not immediately be reached to confirm that account.

In an interview on local television Thursday evening, Col. Dhia al-Wakil, a spokesman for the Baghdad Operations Command, said: “We have sent troops to our border with Syria just in case. We will not accept either the Syrian army or the Free Syrian Army to enter our territory.”


Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/20/world/middleeast/syria-border-with-iraq.html

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iraq Says Rebels in Syria Control Border Posts (Original Post) maddezmom Jul 2012 OP
We'll probably not hear another word about this atrocity. Or, any of the others carried out by FSA leveymg Jul 2012 #1
Indeed, the US is busy attacking the Syrian gov't as the opposition goes on IED, assasination spree. David__77 Jul 2012 #2
Your sympathies are with the dictator. geek tragedy Jul 2012 #6
That's utter nonsense. David__77 Jul 2012 #7
You said that you "wouldn't blame them one bit" geek tragedy Jul 2012 #9
"Anti-dictatorship forces?" lol... rich... David__77 Jul 2012 #11
Obama admin is using diplomatic pressure. geek tragedy Jul 2012 #12
I support the Obama administration policy of non-intervention. David__77 Jul 2012 #13
I never, ever once supported the use of chemical weapons against anyone, anywhere. Nor are my leveymg Jul 2012 #14
Learn how to read a thread and you'll be much less offended. n/t armodem08 Jul 2012 #22
Solidarity with the people of Syria? Daniel537 Jul 2012 #16
Yes, solidarity indeed... David__77 Jul 2012 #20
Killing 22 of Assad's thugs is an "atrocity"? Odin2005 Jul 2012 #3
Thugs? How do you know that? architect359 Jul 2012 #4
It is a war crime Harmony Blue Jul 2012 #5
To the supporters of anti-American dictatorships it is. Daniel537 Jul 2012 #17
You're okay with murdering prisoners. International law isn't. Comrade Grumpy Jul 2012 #18
We don't know the exact circumstances of what happened here Daniel537 Jul 2012 #19
This subthread is about the execution of the soldiers at the border. Comrade Grumpy Jul 2012 #21
your heros cut off arms & legs of the victims, then executed the prisoners in front of the Iraqis.. Alamuti Lotus Jul 2012 #24
And so the great western con continues fingrinn Jul 2012 #8
Willful blindness is no excuse for ignorant apologism for a mass murdering geek tragedy Jul 2012 #10
Don't let that one, above, provoke you into a rules violation. Welcome to DU. leveymg Jul 2012 #15
LOL. That's the first time I've heard the no-civilian-casualties claim so far at least. (nt) Posteritatis Jul 2012 #23
There are many kool ade spins out there may3rd Jul 2012 #25

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. We'll probably not hear another word about this atrocity. Or, any of the others carried out by FSA
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:09 PM
Jul 2012

Reporting on Syria is strictly on a "need to know" basis by the US State Department as told to the corporate media.

David__77

(23,390 posts)
2. Indeed, the US is busy attacking the Syrian gov't as the opposition goes on IED, assasination spree.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 06:05 PM
Jul 2012

They kill their POWs quite routinely, force people to close their stores, loot, bomb, target people on the basis of sect. Nonetheless, the US firmly takes their side. I feel solidarity with the people of Syrian who are confronting with a very ominous threat of a terrorist insurgency based on theocratic, medieval ideology.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Your sympathies are with the dictator.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:16 PM
Jul 2012

You were actively stating your support of the use of chemical weapons against the anti-dictatorship fighters in another thread.

Not. Fooling. Anyone.

David__77

(23,390 posts)
7. That's utter nonsense.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:26 PM
Jul 2012

Syria has done no such thing. You're spouting McCain/Lieberman-style war propaganda.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. You said that you "wouldn't blame them one bit"
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:44 PM
Jul 2012

if they used their "full arsenal" against the anti-dictatorship forces.

That's beyond apologism--it's cheerleading.

"Give me an 'A!'. Give me an S!" . . .

David__77

(23,390 posts)
11. "Anti-dictatorship forces?" lol... rich...
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:51 PM
Jul 2012

I agree with the Obama administration's position of non-intervention and not adding fuel to fire.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
12. Obama admin is using diplomatic pressure.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:58 PM
Jul 2012

Unlike you, they oppose Assad's policy of mass murder and castrating boys who dare call for his removal from power.

David__77

(23,390 posts)
13. I support the Obama administration policy of non-intervention.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:03 AM
Jul 2012

It is a correct policy of opposing military intervention and opposition to arming any non-state actors involved in the internal conflict. The US support of the Annan initiative was correct. Obama's course of action has led to an important defeat for the so-called "R2P" doctrine, either by intentionally or not.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
14. I never, ever once supported the use of chemical weapons against anyone, anywhere. Nor are my
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 08:50 AM
Jul 2012

sympathies "with the dictator" - my sympathies are with the people of Syria, who were not killing each other in large numbers until last March. My approach is not that of pro-regime change propagandists on this board who cheer killing on one side and condemn it on the other.

Your comment is simply wrong and libelous.

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
16. Solidarity with the people of Syria?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:48 PM
Jul 2012

lol, that's rich coming from a Gadhafi apologist. Seems to me like the people of Libya aren't exactly grief stricken over that thug's death either. Maybe you should do a little search on YouTube and see the massive celebrations that erupted across Syria on Wednesday when the people heard of the death's of those war criminals in Damascus. Try actually living in a dictatorship for once before you actually start assuming that the people in those countries somehow love their benevolent rulers.

architect359

(578 posts)
4. Thugs? How do you know that?
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 10:33 PM
Jul 2012

Brush a bit broad, eh? Generalize much? Kind of a freepish knee jerk comment.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
5. It is a war crime
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 10:33 PM
Jul 2012

and if this is how the Rebels will act moving forward I can see why there is concern about the future of Syria.

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
17. To the supporters of anti-American dictatorships it is.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jul 2012

They mourned Gadhafi, and they'll mourn Assad. The rest of us sane folks, not so much.

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
19. We don't know the exact circumstances of what happened here
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:50 PM
Jul 2012

or even if anything happened at all, so its best to wait and see if anybody was actually murdered. But in general, i don't weep for mass murderers like Assad. Their supporters and apologists always complain when they don't receive a trial, and yet where was that same outcry for their victims? I notice you didn't bother to mention the murder of thousands of unarmed civilians in your post by the Assad regime, nor did i expect you to. I'll place my sympathy with those who deserve it.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
21. This subthread is about the execution of the soldiers at the border.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:49 PM
Jul 2012

Not about the numerous war crimes committed by the Assad regime.

I don't know why you would have any expectations of me. I certainly have none of you.

 

Alamuti Lotus

(3,093 posts)
24. your heros cut off arms & legs of the victims, then executed the prisoners in front of the Iraqis..
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 01:14 AM
Jul 2012

that doesn't bother you a bit? Considering its you, I'm not really surprised--crass hypocrisy that's not really thought thru all the way being par for the course--, but, um...really?!

 

fingrinn

(81 posts)
8. And so the great western con continues
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:34 PM
Jul 2012

The only news reports i have personally seen contain the words "unconfirmed sources" spouted by Western media over and over again.
It Amazes me that western media can be following the "rebels" camera in hand documenting the "atrocities" commited by the Syrian government with absolutly no proof.
I have yet to see 1 incidence of attack helicopters, tanks or troops firing on unarmed civilians.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. Willful blindness is no excuse for ignorant apologism for a mass murdering
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:46 PM
Jul 2012

dictator.

Welcome to DU. Enjoy your (hopefully short) stay.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
15. Don't let that one, above, provoke you into a rules violation. Welcome to DU.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:56 AM
Jul 2012

That's GT'S M.O. He doesn't tolerate differing opinions well. On behalf of the rest of us, sorry about his personal attack.

 

may3rd

(593 posts)
25. There are many kool ade spins out there
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:48 AM
Jul 2012

Choose your kool ade source wisely
If you can verify and vet the source, of course.



Some media outlets do not want to up$et their accounting departments that rely on ad revenue income while citizen journalists are less well polished in have their own personal agendas in what they upload.

Variety is the spice of life
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iraq Says Rebels in Syria...