Iraq Says Rebels in Syria Control Border Posts
Source: NYT
BAGHDAD Iraqi government officials said Thursday evening that Syrian rebels had wrested control of all four border checkpoints between Iraq and Syria, and that additional Iraqi forces were being sent to the border.
One top government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the border crossings, in Anbar and Nineveh Provinces, were closed and that Iraqi border forces had witnessed the executions of several Syrian army soldiers at the hands of the Free Syrian Army rebels and the raising of the rebels flag.
The acting minister of interior, Adnan al-Assadi, was quoted by Agence France-Presse as saying that Iraqi forces had witnessed the executions of 22 Syrian soldiers. Mr. Assadi could not immediately be reached to confirm that account.
In an interview on local television Thursday evening, Col. Dhia al-Wakil, a spokesman for the Baghdad Operations Command, said: We have sent troops to our border with Syria just in case. We will not accept either the Syrian army or the Free Syrian Army to enter our territory.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/20/world/middleeast/syria-border-with-iraq.html
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Reporting on Syria is strictly on a "need to know" basis by the US State Department as told to the corporate media.
David__77
(23,390 posts)They kill their POWs quite routinely, force people to close their stores, loot, bomb, target people on the basis of sect. Nonetheless, the US firmly takes their side. I feel solidarity with the people of Syrian who are confronting with a very ominous threat of a terrorist insurgency based on theocratic, medieval ideology.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)You were actively stating your support of the use of chemical weapons against the anti-dictatorship fighters in another thread.
Not. Fooling. Anyone.
David__77
(23,390 posts)Syria has done no such thing. You're spouting McCain/Lieberman-style war propaganda.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)if they used their "full arsenal" against the anti-dictatorship forces.
That's beyond apologism--it's cheerleading.
"Give me an 'A!'. Give me an S!" . . .
David__77
(23,390 posts)I agree with the Obama administration's position of non-intervention and not adding fuel to fire.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Unlike you, they oppose Assad's policy of mass murder and castrating boys who dare call for his removal from power.
David__77
(23,390 posts)It is a correct policy of opposing military intervention and opposition to arming any non-state actors involved in the internal conflict. The US support of the Annan initiative was correct. Obama's course of action has led to an important defeat for the so-called "R2P" doctrine, either by intentionally or not.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)sympathies "with the dictator" - my sympathies are with the people of Syria, who were not killing each other in large numbers until last March. My approach is not that of pro-regime change propagandists on this board who cheer killing on one side and condemn it on the other.
Your comment is simply wrong and libelous.
armodem08
(203 posts)Daniel537
(1,560 posts)lol, that's rich coming from a Gadhafi apologist. Seems to me like the people of Libya aren't exactly grief stricken over that thug's death either. Maybe you should do a little search on YouTube and see the massive celebrations that erupted across Syria on Wednesday when the people heard of the death's of those war criminals in Damascus. Try actually living in a dictatorship for once before you actually start assuming that the people in those countries somehow love their benevolent rulers.
David__77
(23,390 posts)...
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)architect359
(578 posts)Brush a bit broad, eh? Generalize much? Kind of a freepish knee jerk comment.
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)and if this is how the Rebels will act moving forward I can see why there is concern about the future of Syria.
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)They mourned Gadhafi, and they'll mourn Assad. The rest of us sane folks, not so much.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Daniel537
(1,560 posts)or even if anything happened at all, so its best to wait and see if anybody was actually murdered. But in general, i don't weep for mass murderers like Assad. Their supporters and apologists always complain when they don't receive a trial, and yet where was that same outcry for their victims? I notice you didn't bother to mention the murder of thousands of unarmed civilians in your post by the Assad regime, nor did i expect you to. I'll place my sympathy with those who deserve it.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Not about the numerous war crimes committed by the Assad regime.
I don't know why you would have any expectations of me. I certainly have none of you.
Alamuti Lotus
(3,093 posts)that doesn't bother you a bit? Considering its you, I'm not really surprised--crass hypocrisy that's not really thought thru all the way being par for the course--, but, um...really?!
fingrinn
(81 posts)The only news reports i have personally seen contain the words "unconfirmed sources" spouted by Western media over and over again.
It Amazes me that western media can be following the "rebels" camera in hand documenting the "atrocities" commited by the Syrian government with absolutly no proof.
I have yet to see 1 incidence of attack helicopters, tanks or troops firing on unarmed civilians.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)dictator.
Welcome to DU. Enjoy your (hopefully short) stay.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)That's GT'S M.O. He doesn't tolerate differing opinions well. On behalf of the rest of us, sorry about his personal attack.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)may3rd
(593 posts)Choose your kool ade source wisely
If you can verify and vet the source, of course.
Some media outlets do not want to up$et their accounting departments that rely on ad revenue income while citizen journalists are less well polished in have their own personal agendas in what they upload.
Variety is the spice of life