Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

inanna

(3,547 posts)
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:53 PM Mar 2017

Trump Administration Files Motion Aimed At Controlling Consumer Protection Agency

Source: NPR

March 17, 20178:24 PM ET

The Trump administration has gone to court to try to bring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau under its control. The bureau is an executive branch entity, but the president doesn't have direct control over the six-year-old agency.

The Justice Department filed a brief with a federal appeals court in Washington on Friday, making the case that the structure of the agency violates the Constitution.

NPR's Chris Arnold reports that, by law, the head of the bureau can be fired by the president — but only for "inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance."

<snip>

President Trump has larger targets in the financial services area, as NPR's Yuki Noguchi and Tamara Keith have reported:

"Trump signed two directives on Feb. 3, ordering a review of financial industry regulations known as Dodd-Frank and halting implementation of a rule that requires financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients, according to a senior administration official who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.


Read more: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/17/520204967/trump-administration-files-motion-aimed-at-controling-consumer-protection-agency



And he continues flinging his shit far and wide.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

IronLionZion

(45,451 posts)
7. Don't worry, the fox will guard he hen house
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 10:19 PM
Mar 2017

He'll put the financial industry in charge of protecting consumers.

Wait until next week when he outsources America's cybersecurity to the Russians

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
4. Under tRump
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:13 PM
Mar 2017

it is not safe to walk anywhere because you might be run over for protesting, drink water that might be contaminated, and now buy anything. Best thing to do is sit inside and watch how wonderful our country has become on Faux Newz.

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
5. Warren's going on another anti-Dumpf circuit I bet
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:49 PM
Mar 2017

Actually anti-populist Dumpf wouldn't be able to kill it in Congress so he's trying his favorite retribution venue—court.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
8. Trump said. 'We're going to be doing a big number on Dodd-Frank.' ......
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 11:19 PM
Mar 2017

Trump talks like a real bully!


....President Trump has larger targets in the financial services area, as NPR's Yuki Noguchi and Tamara Keith have reported:

"[Trump] signed two directives on [Feb. 3], ordering a review of financial industry regulations known as Dodd-Frank and halting implementation of a rule that requires financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients, according to a senior administration official who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.

"Trump himself made his intentions clear in a meeting with small business owners Monday. 'Dodd-Frank is a disaster,' Trump said. 'We're going to be doing a big number on Dodd-Frank.'

"These executive actions are the start of a Trump administration effort to reverse or revise financial regulations put in place by the Obama administration and seen by Trump and his advisers as onerous and ineffective."

question everything

(47,486 posts)
9. They are determined to undo every single thing that Obama did
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 12:02 AM
Mar 2017

Hey, let's go back to the Great Recession. To high rate of unemployment.

Reminds me of when Reagan was determined to undo the New Deal but was not successful.


pat_k

(9,313 posts)
10. Independence of any agency is an anathema to DT
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 03:11 PM
Mar 2017

He will not be satisfied until the power of the U.S. President is completely unfettered. Watch for attempts to undermine the independence of Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Igel

(35,320 posts)
11. Here's the question.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 04:14 PM
Mar 2017

We have a three-part government. Judicial, legislative, executive. Each has a bit of in-house legislative, executive, and judicial, but only for their own purposes. Nirvana for governing.

The consumer protection agency. Is it judicial, legislative, or executive?

If legislative, then it's not enforcing laws. If executive, well, all executive authority is invested in the president.

It'll come down to precedent--we've let the legislative intrude on the executive and the executive to bypass the legislative many times in the past.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
13. A body that "acts in part quasi-legislatively and in part quasi-judicially"
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 07:58 PM
Mar 2017

There is precedent. There are a number of governmental functions that don't fall neatly into one of the three branches. For example, the Federal Election Commission (http://www.fec.gov/about.shtml )

The duties of the FEC, which is an independent regulatory agency, are to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of Presidential elections.


And then there's the Federal Reserve. It falls under "executive authority" only in so far as the power to appoint members of the board of governors is given to the president. The Fed's power to enact policy is granted by legislation, but the policies it sets are not subject to the approval of anyone in the legislative or executive branch. Members of the board of governors serve terms that are longer than that of the president. The legislators who created the Fed, and over the years have modified the law governing it, recognized the importance of creating a body empowered to set policy with a great deal of autonomy.

Similarly, legislators who shaped the laws governing the Consumer Protection Agency recognized the agency's purpose required some level of independence. The director does not serve "at the pleasure of the president," they are only subject to dismissal if the president can demonstrate “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.”

Here is a list of "Independent Regulatory Agencies" as defined by 44 U.S.C. §3502(5)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3502

the term “independent regulatory agency” means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Federal Maritime Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Mine Enforcement Safety and Health Review Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Office of Financial Research, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and any other similar agency designated by statute as a Federal independent regulatory agency or commission;


Generally, the heads of these agencies can only be removed for cause, or they are governed by a board. Some governed by a board have limits the number of members of one political party who may serve at any one time. They usually have both rulemaking and adjudicative functions.

The status of the trade commission as an independent agency is discussed in Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935). Justice Sutherland, writing for a unanimous court, wrote:

In administering the provisions of the statute in respect of "unfair methods of competition" -- that is to say filling in and administering the details embodied by that general standard -- the commission acts in part quasi-legislatively and in part quasi-judicially... To the extent that it exercises any executive function -- as distinguished from executive power in a constitutional sense-- it does so in the discharge and effectiveness of its quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial powers, or as an agency of the legislative or judicial departments of the government.


Undoubtedly there are many other cases over the years addressing the question of the limits of presidential authority over certain purportedly 'executive" agencies, but I think it is pretty clear that congress and the courts (and rational presidents) recognize that some functions need to be insulated from political interference. Unfortunately, some of these agencies don't have the power to litigate on their own behalf, and must instead rely on the Department of Justice -- a fatal flaw as far as I'm concerned.

Reagan did a good job of stripping away the independence of many "independent" agencies. DT is determined to finish the job. Whatever success he has will be EXTREMELY damaging to the country for a long time to come.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Administration File...