Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,559 posts)
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 04:19 PM Apr 2017

Astronomers discover 'Super-Earth' planet outside solar system that could support life

Source: New York Daily News

It could be just like Earth, except bigger.

Astronomers have discovered another planet that could support life, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

It's the fifth such life-possible planet outside our solar system revealed in less than a year.

This new planet is rocky, like Earth, and has the right temperatures for water, according to the study. Rocky planets within that habitable zone of a star are considered the best place to find evidence of some form of life.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/astronomers-discover-super-earth-planet-support-life-article-1.3075550

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Astronomers discover 'Super-Earth' planet outside solar system that could support life (Original Post) brooklynite Apr 2017 OP
Forget about going there Warpy Apr 2017 #1
It's just the air and water we want. bluedigger Apr 2017 #10
And that sweet, sweet coal and oil. n/t Orsino Apr 2017 #18
Well, obviously Exxon and Rosneft have a long term plan. bluedigger Apr 2017 #19
When we have warp drives and transporters... Orsino Apr 2017 #20
These planets can all be explored by robots and/or AI later. Oneironaut Apr 2017 #21
We'd better find one quick CanonRay Apr 2017 #2
Road trip! Orrex Apr 2017 #3
39 light years? We better pack a lot of beer and cigarettes. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2017 #6
I'm pretty sure it's mostly downhill, so we can coast Orrex Apr 2017 #9
I for one welcome our new Super-Earth Overlords Achilleaze Apr 2017 #4
Maybe this guy will come and take us for a visit. Kingofalldems Apr 2017 #5
To serve man MyNameGoesHere Apr 2017 #8
As opposed to all the Super Earths inside the solar system? Thor_MN Apr 2017 #7
The lack of super earths inside the solar system ProudLib72 Apr 2017 #11
Don't forget the one behind Uranus. Thor_MN Apr 2017 #12
We are leaving that super earth for the republicans ProudLib72 Apr 2017 #13
It orbits a red dwarf every 25 days Dammit Jim Apr 2017 #14
Why does the conclusion follow from the assertion? mr_lebowski Apr 2017 #15
Given its rather short orbital period... paleotn Apr 2017 #17
This system is roughly edge on to on to ours... paleotn Apr 2017 #16

Warpy

(111,257 posts)
1. Forget about going there
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 04:37 PM
Apr 2017

6.6 times the amount of mass means we'd be unable to move on the surface, likely unable to breathe, even in an oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere.

We're only finding the big planets now. Eventually we might refine our search enough to find smaller planets and moons around gas giants that might be more suitable.

Until then, knowing how many galaxies there are and that they average 2 billion stars, each, and that most of those stars have planets is enough.

Are we alone?

Not bloody likely.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
10. It's just the air and water we want.
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 06:55 PM
Apr 2017

We can send robots down for that. After a 39 light year trip, we'll be pretty well adapted to space.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
19. Well, obviously Exxon and Rosneft have a long term plan.
Thu Apr 20, 2017, 01:42 PM
Apr 2017

You don't think they're just in this for the money, do you?

Oneironaut

(5,494 posts)
21. These planets can all be explored by robots and/or AI later.
Thu Apr 20, 2017, 01:52 PM
Apr 2017

We would be squished, but a lander or lower mass robot would be just fine.

Unfortunately, most of these planets are so far away that getting there in the first place is probably the biggest problem.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
7. As opposed to all the Super Earths inside the solar system?
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 05:43 PM
Apr 2017

Science reporting is getting worse every year...

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
11. The lack of super earths inside the solar system
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 07:03 PM
Apr 2017

is a Chinese hoax. There are two hiding just out of sight behind Jupiter!

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
15. Why does the conclusion follow from the assertion?
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 10:07 PM
Apr 2017

I.E. why must it be tidally locked given the 25 days/Red Dwarf scenario?

I think one of the biggest reasons we're unlikely to ever encounter 'life' is not only the immense distances, but that, in effect, you have to multiply these distances by some factor of 'time'. You know how if earths history was a year, how we humans appeared in the like the last 10 seconds or something to that effect? Does anyone see any reason to think we're going to 'last' a whole lot longer and keep growing technologically at the same time? I don't.

So in order to 'encounter' another species one or both would have to travel incredible differences, but ALSO start/end their journeys during a window of time that is cosmologically-speaking ... INCREDIBLY brief/tiny.

When you think only in terms of 'distance' (immense at it is), you're forgetting you also need to MULTIPLY the distance ... by a time factor that decreases the chances of an encounter with another species by many orders of magnitude ... and this applies not only to physical encounters, but even one that simply involves 'transmissions'.

Every living species will arise via Evolution, and will eventually 'compete' itself out of existence by consuming their planets resources long before they start taking extra-solar-system jaunts ...

paleotn

(17,913 posts)
17. Given its rather short orbital period...
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 10:46 PM
Apr 2017

it's inevitable that LHS1140b is tidally locked. Good ole torque on the tidal bulges make that a given. Still, it's a relatively good candidate for life. In addition to the timing issue you brought up, and I totally agree with you on that, I'm not sold on the idea that what we call intelligence is even a successful, long term survival strategy. We may well be a short term, evolutionary dead end. Microbes and "non-intelligent" multi cellular life are far, far more probable than Vulcans and Klingons and should leave tell tale evidence in the planet's atmosphere.

paleotn

(17,913 posts)
16. This system is roughly edge on to on to ours...
Wed Apr 19, 2017, 10:10 PM
Apr 2017

so it ought to give a good look see at LHS1140b's atmosphere, if it has much of one, as it passes in front of its star. Stay tuned.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Astronomers discover 'Sup...