New Version Of Obamacare Repeal Would Gut Pre-Existing Condition Guarantee
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by DonViejo (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: huff post
04/26/2017 12:56 am ET | Updated 7 hours ago
This is better?
By Jonathan
Apparently yanking away the funds that allow millions of people to get health insurance isnt enough for some House Republicans.
Now they also want to gut the Affordable Care Acts protection for people with pre-existing conditions.
Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.) on Tuesday formally unveiled an amendment to the American Health Care Act, the bill to repeal Obamacare that Republicans tried to get through the House last month. The amendment, which HuffPosts Matt Fuller first reported last week, is the product of negotiations among key Republicans, including Vice President Mike Pence.
A main goal of the proposal is to win over conservative House members who last month opposed the GOP repeal bill because, in their view, it still left too much of the 2010 health care law in place. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, helped to craft the amendment. And although he has not yet declared support for it publicly, a few other conservatives have signaled they may be ready to switch from no to yes.
.............
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/24/politics/kfile-mike-pompeo-wikileaks/index.html
If you have not called your Rep and Senators today, please do so now-leave a message. Thanks in advance.
HuffPost Politics? Verified account @HuffPostPol
New version of Obamacare repeal would gut the pre-existing condition guarantee http://huff.to/2pxZq1S
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
bucolic_frolic
(43,652 posts)I mean they were GODS in 2012 ... Ryan's not boasting how giving them
Hundreds of billions in tax cuts will create 18.6 million new jobs?
Paul Ryan is slipping badly. Maybe Russia will send him a check.
Kennah
(14,392 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)This will kill her if she votes for it.
bucolic_frolic
(43,652 posts)I mean why not invalidate everything when you need it. And pass a law to force
us to carry it in the first place while you're at it.
Everyone needs a $Billion indemnity policy and an Umbrella policy that doesn't
ever actually pay anything. But we can boast about it!
Am I missing something?
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,144 posts)still_one
(92,609 posts)Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)You are just re-enforcing the RW meme every time. Call it either the ACA or TRUMPCare.
It was one of the stupidest things the left every did, embracing that RW term.
bluestarone
(17,201 posts)I AGREE!!!!!!
BumRushDaShow
(130,514 posts)here in Philly (and probably elsewhere) to reject this latest attempt.
If that amendment got included, they would lose the House GOP moderates.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)The consensus of Forum Hosts agrees this is opinion and analysis.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.