Donald Trump Reportedly Suggested Covering Border Wall With Solar Panels
Source: Huffington Post
06/06/2017 06:50 pm ET
Two contracting firms have already pitched a similar plan to the Department of Homeland Security.
By Mollie Reilly
President Donald Trump pitched congressional leaders on placing solar panels on his proposed wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, Politico and Axios reported Tuesday.
Trumps suggestion reportedly came during a meeting with GOP House and Senate leaders, including House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), at the White House on Tuesday afternoon. Trump said the electricity generated by the panels could help offset the expense of the wall, the news sites reported, which the Department of Homeland Security has estimated will cost more than $21 billion.
Axios, citing three people familiar with the meeting, reported:
Trump said his vision was a wall 40 feet to 50 feet high and covered with solar panels so theyd be beautiful structures, the people said. The President said that most walls you hear about are 14 feet or 15 feet tall but this would be nothing like those walls. Trump told the lawmakers they could talk about the solar-paneled wall as long as they said it was his idea. One person cautioned that the President wasnt presenting the solar-paneled wall as the definite solution.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-border-wall-solar-panels_us_59372050e4b01fc18d3e79c3?section=us_politics
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Please - someone certify him!
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)That would put them in Mexico, who could claim them and all the electricity they produced.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)OR .. North facing solar panels.... that's a winner....
genxlib
(5,526 posts)Mexico is paying for the wall after all, right?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)if you add in the cost of the 50 foot mounting wall the solar panels are anchored to.
SharonAnn
(13,773 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I want to go to bed but.. it's just toooo entertaining here..
Kleveland
(1,257 posts)Better still!
That way it will provide jobs for the coal miners, since no forward looking corporation even wants to burn coal anymore!
hatrack
(59,587 posts)That will dissuade those cantaloupe-calved Messcan smugglers!!!
Yavin4
(35,438 posts)And then you would have to rebuild it all over again?
0rganism
(23,954 posts)2 for 1 deal, 1st job building the wall and a 2nd job burning it down. every day. remember, jobs jobs jobs!
harun
(11,348 posts)Kleveland
(1,257 posts)Keep them miners diggin'!
Two promises kept at once.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)Just think about all the pissed-off libruls!!!
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)NNadir
(33,518 posts)...or both.
Two bad ideas put together don't make a good idea.
MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)Maybe $40 billion!
And how does that help pay for the wall anyway? The feds sell the electricity to utility companies who then sell it to consumers? So we end up paying for a twice as expensive wall? Good plan!
not fooled
(5,801 posts)the bigger and grander the wall becomes.
In his mind.
Soon it will be 500 feet tall and made from angel's wings.