Democrats, Republicans Receive Death Threats After Steve Scalise Shooting Amid Security Concerns
Source: International Business Times
Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers are receiving death threats after the House of Representatives Majority Whip Steve Scalise was shot at during a congressional baseball practice Wednesday.
During a security briefing, California lawmaker Nanette Diaz Barragán said Democratic representatives have been receiving threatening calls on their personal mobile phones, with the caller saying, You guys are next, and You Democrats, you Democrats, Buzzfeed reported. The threats came shortly after Scalise was admitted to the hospital with fatal injuries.
Claudia Tenney, a Republican representative from New York, received an email with the subject line, One down, 216 to go
The email further stated: "Did you NOT expect this? When you take away lives of the ordinary people in order to pay off the wealthiest among us, your own lives are forfeit. Certainly, your souls and morality were lost long before. Good riddance.
The gunman who was responsible for fatally injuring Scalise and wounding three other lawmakers has not been ruled as a part of any organized gang by the FBI. Tim Slater, a special agent of the FBI, said it is still early to state anything affirmatively when asked whether the gunman made an attempt to assassinate Scalise, the New York Times reported. The investigators were exploring all angles, he said.
Read more: http://www.ibtimes.com/democrats-republicans-receive-death-threats-after-steve-scalise-shooting-amid-2552484
Full title would not fit: Democrats, Republicans Receive Death Threats After Steve Scalise Shooting Amid Lawmakers Security Concerns
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,917 posts)Priority #1 for shit-stirrers: More security. As taxpayers, we did not sign up to protect provocative political hate merchants. Free security while they ratchet-up the rehetoric.
What could possibly go wrong.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Keep taking things from people except for one: guns; sky's the limit. Dangerous business. Must adjust with the times.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)I hope all of these 'individuals' are the big mouthed, keyboard anarchists we see so much on the internet
Last thing we need are angry people carrying around their own ammo dump, shooting at whatever
Making it more difficult, loose gun laws
bucolic_frolic
(43,156 posts)are totally permissive in their use of guns. It never made any sense to me.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)People don't know how to write English any more.
I think the writer was trying to write "life-threatening" but thought it was too many letters to type with their thumb.
d_r
(6,907 posts)I thought I'd missed the news over night and went looking at news sites. Very sloppy.
ProfessorGAC
(65,013 posts)My first thought was "What did i miss?"
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)I checked the latest updates an hour ago, so was my reaction when I read that.
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)blueseas
(11,575 posts)I wonder ???
sinkingfeeling
(51,454 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)I thought maybe he died already and I missed the news.
Hugin
(33,140 posts)Gotta pump this pulp out there... No time to proof read. Publish or perish.
UpInArms
(51,282 posts)The word should be "seriously"
Stupid people don't have a good grasp of the English language.
Sigh
bucolic_frolic
(43,156 posts)was always denied when Right Wing Radio did it. Don't see why it applies in this instance.
What the gunman did was deplorable. Simply there are people who can't handle responsibility.
If anything comes from this incident, it would in my mind hopefully be some restrictions on
dangerous misfitted people bearing arms.
Yes I know, the real solution is for everyone to be armed at all times. How are the good guys
separated from the bad guys? Just keep shooting, it will sort itself out.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)This is a way to get attention for yourself and your cause and it does not take a lot of skill to spread mayhem with a semi automatic assault weapon. Suicidal types get noticed you will be remembered. What is frightening is the possibility of groups perpetrating such crimes. The potential of such happening again is certain in a country awash in such weapons.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)babylonsister
(171,065 posts)I think a few of these clowns need to be hunted down and prosecuted very publicly. Might tone down those that think they can get away with it, which they currently can.
CousinIT
(9,241 posts)Our IC has the means to get whoever is doing this. I hope they use every tool at their disposal to run these guys down.
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)As far as I know he's still alive which means it wasn't fatal or have I forgotten my basic English language as I'm aging??
Igel
(35,300 posts)There are a lot of them. As long as they get the basic idea the fine-grained details don't matter like the context. A lot of times they're taught that words have perfect synonyms, so drop out one and put in another for "style."
determining one's fate
the fatal flaw in this dazzling woman: a total lack of taste Marya Mannes
causing death a fatal crash a fatal disease a fatal wound
bringing ruin a fatal attraction to gambling
causing failure a fatal design flaw Lack of sufficient support was fatal to his campaign.
(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fatal)
We know that the context is "life or death", and if an injury is fatal it has produced or with very high confidence will produce death.
But as a synonym to "lethal", that may not be obvious. A lethal poison can be consumed without your dying; hyperbole's often been built into the meaning, so when a hairy buffalo is described as "lethal", you expect a lot of intoxication, not dead partiers. Same for "deadly". If you get access to "fatal" just by using more common near-synonyms, you miss an important bit of the word's semantics.
I teach science. But my kids will often say that two words are synonyms, because that's what they're taught. "No, speed and velocity aren't the same." I point out that I was taught that English only had one pair of synonyms (which I can't remember 30 years after I was told this, and suspect I was never actually taught the words by my sociolinguistics prof): some sort of wort with two neighboring villages using different words for it. The villages grew, merged, and for a while each word, when used, identified where the speaker's relatives lived. Then post-WWII the population intermarried enough that even this meaning was lost, so the village had two equal words in equal use by any person in the village in any context for the same thing. While this is a bit hyperbolic itself, I'm sure there must be other examples, there aren't many.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)If it's correct to use 'fatal' to describe a shooting where the victim hasn't died, things really have changed. :
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)Huh WHAT ?!?!?!
Anyone else catch that ??
"fatally injuring" means to kill, as in dead, expired, deceased, gone, toes-up, six feet under, pushing daisies, dirt nap, worm food...