Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:50 PM Jul 2017

Democrats clamor for Jared Kushner's security clearance to be revoked

Source: Guardian


Ethics experts describe omission of meeting with Donald Trump Jr and Russia lawyer as ‘consciousness of guilt’ and say it warrants re-evaluation of clearance

David Smith, Ben Jacobs and Sabrina Siddiqui in Washington and Amanda Holpuch in New York
Wednesday 12 July 2017 16.16 EDT


Jared Kushner’s White House security clearance should be “re-evaluated” after the revelation that he attended a now notorious meeting with Donald Trump Jr and a Russian lawyer, according to a former White House ethics tsar.

Democratic senators were still more forceful on Wednesday, one saying of Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser: “I don’t know why he still has a job.”

Kushner is facing growing pressure over his presence at the June 2016 meeting, which email correspondence published by Trump Jr said was intended as part of a Russian government effort to damage Hillary Clinton’s election campaign.

Kushner was required to disclose all meetings with foreign government officials over the past seven years when he applied for security clearance for his White House role. He initially failed to mention the Trump Jr meeting, then included it on a supplemental form.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/12/jared-kushner-security-clearance-russia-meeting-donald-trump-jr

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats clamor for Jared Kushner's security clearance to be revoked (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jul 2017 OP
Don't you just love these retroactive disclosures? Not good enough!! Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2017 #1
K&R Solly Mack Jul 2017 #2
It should be pulled UCmeNdc Jul 2017 #3
Definitely no security clearance for Jared. Hieronymus Jul 2017 #4
It should be revoked for all the Trumps IronLionZion Jul 2017 #5
Of course it should be. Who would question that? nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2017 #6
nothing will happen maxsolomon Jul 2017 #7
Accepting a pardon would be an admission of guilt Kaleva Jul 2017 #10
Ivanka's too, and her dad's jmowreader Jul 2017 #8
About Damn Time! Dems are so fricking timid, finally they smell the blood in the water flibbitygiblets Jul 2017 #9
"Consciousness of Guilt" ... Law and Legal Definition. NurseJackie Jul 2017 #11
Why aren't Republicans clammering also?? riversedge Jul 2017 #12

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
1. Don't you just love these retroactive disclosures? Not good enough!!
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:56 PM
Jul 2017

But these people are used to NO consequences for their actions due to loads of money or protection from those with it. And, so far, there have been very few consequences for all of their atrocious behavior around the election and after. I keep thinking I'm going to makeup from this nightmare. How can this be happening in our country in 2017!!??

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
10. Accepting a pardon would be an admission of guilt
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 06:40 PM
Jul 2017

Trump would be telling the world that members of his campaign did in fact collude with the Russians.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
8. Ivanka's too, and her dad's
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 06:24 PM
Jul 2017

If I had a father/daughter/SIL family who was all cleared and one of them turned out to be a spy, the odds the other two are also involved are high enough we couldn't take the chance of leaving them with access. Especially since the odds of at least one of them here being compromised are extremely high.

flibbitygiblets

(7,220 posts)
9. About Damn Time! Dems are so fricking timid, finally they smell the blood in the water
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 06:40 PM
Jul 2017

R's would have been clamoring back in the quaint old days of "backdoor channel with the Russians at their embassy".

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
11. "Consciousness of Guilt" ... Law and Legal Definition.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:17 PM
Jul 2017
Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition.

Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something). This is sometimes referred to as “consciousness of guilt”.

https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/consciousness-of-guilt/
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democrats clamor for Jare...