Body camera video allegedly shows Baltimore cop planting evidence
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by muriel_volestrangler (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: CNN
New video casts a glaring light on Baltimore police practices as the department and city grapple with a distrustful public and record-setting violent crime.
The video reportedly shows what happened during what might otherwise have been a typical drug bust on January 24. Released by the Office of the Public Defender, the video purports to show a Baltimore police officer planting evidence at the scene of a drug arrest.
The Baltimore Police Department has launched an investigation and held a news conference releasing other videos while offering a timeline of events.
Snip-
The video, recorded on police body-worn cameras, shows the officer placing a plastic bag into a food can, then partially hiding it under a piece of debris. Thirty seconds later the audio begins, and the officer says, "I'm going to check here. Hold on," as his colleagues laugh. The officer then gives a cursory look at other items in the debris-strewn lot and appears to stumble onto the drugs in the can.
"Yo!" the officer shouts at his colleagues as he holds up the small cellophane bag containing several pills. One of his colleagues shouts back, "What's up?" The video ends a few seconds later.
More at link, with video
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/20/us/baltimore-cop-allegedly-planting-evidence/index.html
The real reason drug laws exist.... planting evidence.... almost impossible without a major investigation to prove when it happens....
christx30
(6,241 posts)is still giving testimony in court.
What needs to happen is he is suspended pending a full investigation. And all of his old cases should be reopened to see if he planted evidence in them too. Any cop that supports this guy in any way is not a 'good' cop. Actual decent officers should turn their backs on this guy if he's found guilty.
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)Once the LEO (or even lab) is found suspect, the municipality usually gets sued and they end up having to throw out cases. We had that here in Philly a couple years ago involving a special drug unit, where they had to throw out 158 convictions.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)SwissTony
(2,560 posts)how does this prove Suspect A is guilty of possession (or whatever)? It's an obviously public place, with lots of junk. Officer X walks onto the property and heads towards a non-intuitive spot and "finds" drugs. How did he "know" where to go and how is Suspect A involved?
geretogo
(1,281 posts)cpamomfromtexas
(1,245 posts)It should be automatic life without parole.
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)who was the victim of planted evidence. He was found not guilty. I can't remember the time frame but it makes me wonder how long this dirty practice has been going on.