Landlord troubles: rich San Franciscans in uproar after their private street is sold
Source: The Guardian
For most San Franciscans accustomed to being at the whims of speculators in a soaring real estate market, the arrival of a new landlord is a near certain harbinger of bad news.
But the residents of Presidio Terrace are not most San Franciscans, and its highly unlikely that theyll be crafting desperate Facebook messages seeking an affordable room to rent in Oakland (dog friendly pleeeeease), making plans to move to Los Angeles or living in a box.
Still, in May of this year, the owners of 35 of San Franciscos most exclusive and expensive homes became aware of a decidedly undesirable development: they no longer owned their private street.
Two upstart real estate investors from San Jose, Tina Lam and Michael Cheng, had snapped up the street, the sidewalks and the landscaped islands of Presidio Terrace at a public auction of tax-defaulted properties in April 2015. The pair shelled out $90,582.50 for the plot, and theyre how exploring ways to earn a return on that investment.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/07/san-francisco-presidio-terrace-private-road-sold-angry-residents
Now what......................
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)Shouldn't two enterprising individuals have the right to do ANYTHING they want with a great idea to turn a profit?
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)But for that brief moment they knew what it felt like to be one of the rest of us.
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)Tolls to get in and out. Those homeowners can afford it.
(Wink)
Sancho
(9,070 posts)Coventina
(27,120 posts)You live on a private street?
You suffer the consequences!!
NCjack
(10,279 posts)and investors. Those rich guys will raise their prices for what ever they do, and the consumers will pay the new owners of the street.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)You know, people like Feinstein and Pelosi.
But enjoy your broad brush!
Calista241
(5,586 posts)She has done some good work over the years, but she is not anywhere close to middle class.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)I was responding to this:
"All of those rich guys got rich by gouging their customers"
Response to Blue_Adept (Reply #22)
Post removed
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Since wealth is a matter of perspective, the same could be said about many of us. If I'm not mistaken, that's the main reason tRump supporters hate educated people who don't live paycheck to paycheck. Aren't we better than that?
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)But I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt in 2017. Hell, there are plenty of women still alive who were born when women weren't allowed to VOTE, yet I'm not going to hold that against all men.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)I quit posting some time ago. I do (did) however come back from time to time to read the news and take the pulse. So apparently ALL of the people who live on that street are your enemies? Really? Because it's private? There are privately owned streets all over the US! Many of them are in municipalities that cannot afford to maintain them, but this street has expensive homes, so therefor all the people who live in must be against you. Hypocrites.
Good for the couple who bought the street, that's exactly how it's supposed to work. I feel sad for the people who live on that street and identify as progressives, democrats, liberals seeing that the people who are supposed to be in their corner are pointing and laughing at their discomfort, just because they have worked harder than you have.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)And even some who did just assume that those who live on that street are bad people simply because they have means, and that they got those means by "screwing over other people". Maybe they invented something useful, like urinal cakes? Maybe they inherited their homes from their families, but are still decent people whose HOA and accountants simply aren't up to snuff? We don't know them, and judging them so recklessly, being gleeful of something that may just as easily happen to one of us, is, as many R's say about Trump, "Deeply Concerning".
Luciferous
(6,079 posts)Iggo
(47,552 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)elias7
(4,003 posts)It seems no one ever received the bill, no notice made of intent to collect, no notice of default, no notice of intent to auction/sale.
Whoever made that choice does not seem to have made any effort at communication. If there was no return of communication, one would have to consider there has been no contact.
Is this any worse than cutting voters from the roles without notification? Option to rectify?
vkkv
(3,384 posts)The bill was never sent to their HOA, only to their old accountant from the 1980's..
They could have used a better system, but with 35 houses on the street.... ?
Iggo
(47,552 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)Read the full piece at the link.
Wasn't a matter tax evasion..
This kind of crap shouldn't happen to anyone, rich or poor.. right?
Are you with me on that?
No ?
ananda
(28,860 posts)Why didn't the rich people on the street just buy
it themselves?
Johnyawl
(3,205 posts)...they obviously wouldn't know their street was on the auction block
Mosby
(16,311 posts)So the city sold it.
DK504
(3,847 posts)impossible to live in any longer. The evictions that occured when Facebook and all the douchebags set up shop an hour away in San Jose went through the roof. Regular workers that lived there before this dickheads moved in to the City help create an cite to expensive to live in.
The City even proved buses FOR FREE to transport the little shits to their "campuses", also known as work place sicne they are colleges any longer. Despite the fact that the train from SF to San Jose is great, the little shits couldn't be bothered to use the great public transportation and continued to screw the City. If they are making soooooo much money they can pay for their own fucking transportation. Everything in SF is now nothing more than a ponzi scheme to screw the working class that used to be able to afford to live there.
Screw all these asses that cry over having to pay their fair share. Even those these a-holes with Facebook and the others just HAVE to live in the City rather than close to where they work. I have no sympathy for any of these rich shits in SF.
Johnyawl
(3,205 posts)Mosby
(16,311 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)that was to pay the taxes.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)xor
(1,204 posts)While a bit sleazy, I don't think anyone is going to suffer too greatly from this. Unless they try to turn into a toll road, I don't think I really care about this too much.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)If I were them, or perhaps a famous musician, I might not mind living in a gated community. You may not agree, but imagine having people camping outside your house for years on end, just because you're famous.