Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 12:03 PM Aug 2017

Missouri set to execute inmate despite evidence suggesting innocence

Last edited Tue Aug 22, 2017, 01:25 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: U.zk. Indeprndent

Marcellus Williams, now 48, was found guilty of the August 1998 murder of Lisha Gayle, 42, at home in St Louis. He was convicted and sentenced to death three years later.

He is scheduled to be killed by lethal injection at 6pm on Tuesday (12am GMT).

There is no physical evidence, no eyewitnesses that directly connect Williams to the murder, the DNA on the weapon wasn't his, the bloody footprint at the murder scene wasn't from Williams' shoe and was a different size, and the hair fibres found weren't his.


In 2015 the Missouri Supreme Court delayed Williams’ execution to allow for further DNA testing, but despite the new evidence it ruled last week that the killing should go ahead. Williams’ legal team is requesting a new hearing or for his sentence to be reduced to life in prison.



Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/marcellus-williams-missouri-execution-death-row-inmate-new-evidence-innocence-murder-neil-gorsuch-a7906321.html



Why are states hell bent on executions, despite evidence to the contrary? This man received a stall, for the sake of DNA testing; which appears to be exonerating.

WTF!








UPDATE


LL Cool J. asks people to get the word out and provides link to Petition




14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri set to execute inmate despite evidence suggesting innocence (Original Post) laserhaas Aug 2017 OP
That seems fair (NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) SwissTony Aug 2017 #1
You would think yge sanctity of life would be more important laserhaas Aug 2017 #2
"Hey, all dem "n***** deserve to be lynched..." Archae Aug 2017 #3
The shoe me state laserhaas Aug 2017 #4
Here's a link to a petition laserhaas Aug 2017 #5
This is one of the biggest reasons I'm against the death penalty WhoIsNumberNone Aug 2017 #6
Makes me weep, for the souls taken, needlessly laserhaas Aug 2017 #7
Must. Kill. Must. Kill. DavidDvorkin Aug 2017 #8
Missouri Gov just issued a stay of execution! greyl Aug 2017 #9
Woo Hoo laserhaas Aug 2017 #11
What was the evidence on which he was found guilty? Honeycombe8 Aug 2017 #10
Here are a couple of articles. StevieM Aug 2017 #12
Oh, well, good. The governor has issued a stay. Honeycombe8 Aug 2017 #13
I think the type of DNA testing they did is somewhat new. The murder was committed in 1998. StevieM Aug 2017 #14

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
1. That seems fair (NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 12:15 PM
Aug 2017

You pay two "witnesses" to say he confessed to the killing. All physical evidence suggests he was NOT the killer.

Come on, America. You can do better than that.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
2. You would think yge sanctity of life would be more important
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 12:18 PM
Aug 2017

Than a state's need to execute; and a prosectors office desire to log an (unjustified) win.

Archae

(46,327 posts)
3. "Hey, all dem "n***** deserve to be lynched..."
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 12:24 PM
Aug 2017

Just that the Missouri courts are the ones doing the lynching of this guy.

WhoIsNumberNone

(7,875 posts)
6. This is one of the biggest reasons I'm against the death penalty
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 01:32 PM
Aug 2017

It costs a hell of a lot of money to try a capital case, and after spending so much these assholes can't stand to admit they got the wrong guy. Even when it's obvious to everyone else in the world.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
7. Makes me weep, for the souls taken, needlessly
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 01:44 PM
Aug 2017

Last edited Tue Aug 22, 2017, 02:48 PM - Edit history (1)

and the closed cases that should be kept open.

Rage is too soft a word...for my mix of emotions

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
10. What was the evidence on which he was found guilty?
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 04:07 PM
Aug 2017

Did he confess? Or....??? There has to be some evidence to the contrary, to support a guilty verdict.

There are false confessions, too.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
13. Oh, well, good. The governor has issued a stay.
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 05:59 PM
Aug 2017

That's pretty convincing...DNA on the murder weapon.

I can see why he was convicted. The woman is savagely murdered, and he is caught with her personal property in his trunk, and he had sold her laptop. Then two cellmates testify that he confessed.

It would be interesting to know if the cellmates are white. ??? Or why the weapon wasn't tested for DNA before.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
14. I think the type of DNA testing they did is somewhat new. The murder was committed in 1998.
Tue Aug 22, 2017, 06:42 PM
Aug 2017

It was one cellmate and one ex-girlfriend, both convicted felons in their own right.

I tend to be skeptical when the police or DA tell us that a suspect has for some reason decided to confess to their cellmate.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Missouri set to execute i...