Missouri set to execute inmate despite evidence suggesting innocence
Last edited Tue Aug 22, 2017, 01:25 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: U.zk. Indeprndent
Marcellus Williams, now 48, was found guilty of the August 1998 murder of Lisha Gayle, 42, at home in St Louis. He was convicted and sentenced to death three years later.
He is scheduled to be killed by lethal injection at 6pm on Tuesday (12am GMT).
There is no physical evidence, no eyewitnesses that directly connect Williams to the murder, the DNA on the weapon wasn't his, the bloody footprint at the murder scene wasn't from Williams' shoe and was a different size, and the hair fibres found weren't his.
In 2015 the Missouri Supreme Court delayed Williams execution to allow for further DNA testing, but despite the new evidence it ruled last week that the killing should go ahead. Williams legal team is requesting a new hearing or for his sentence to be reduced to life in prison.
Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/marcellus-williams-missouri-execution-death-row-inmate-new-evidence-innocence-murder-neil-gorsuch-a7906321.html
Why are states hell bent on executions, despite evidence to the contrary? This man received a stall, for the sake of DNA testing; which appears to be exonerating.
WTF!
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
LL Cool J. asks people to get the word out and provides link to Petition
Link to tweet
SwissTony
(2,560 posts)You pay two "witnesses" to say he confessed to the killing. All physical evidence suggests he was NOT the killer.
Come on, America. You can do better than that.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Than a state's need to execute; and a prosectors office desire to log an (unjustified) win.
Archae
(46,327 posts)Just that the Missouri courts are the ones doing the lynching of this guy.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Wonder they dont do a pay per view
Fruk'rs
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)It costs a hell of a lot of money to try a capital case, and after spending so much these assholes can't stand to admit they got the wrong guy. Even when it's obvious to everyone else in the world.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 22, 2017, 02:48 PM - Edit history (1)
and the closed cases that should be kept open.
Rage is too soft a word...for my mix of emotions
DavidDvorkin
(19,475 posts)The state playing the role of a psychotic serial killer.
greyl
(22,990 posts)Per CNN tv.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Did he confess? Or....??? There has to be some evidence to the contrary, to support a guilty verdict.
There are false confessions, too.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)That's pretty convincing...DNA on the murder weapon.
I can see why he was convicted. The woman is savagely murdered, and he is caught with her personal property in his trunk, and he had sold her laptop. Then two cellmates testify that he confessed.
It would be interesting to know if the cellmates are white. ??? Or why the weapon wasn't tested for DNA before.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)It was one cellmate and one ex-girlfriend, both convicted felons in their own right.
I tend to be skeptical when the police or DA tell us that a suspect has for some reason decided to confess to their cellmate.