Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 09:47 PM Nov 2017

Documents: US Steel sought to keep chemical spill secret

Source: Associated Press


Updated 4:47 pm, Wednesday, November 15, 2017

PORTAGE, Ind. (AP) — Environmentalists are questioning why the public wasn't notified about an October chemical spill into a Lake Michigan tributary that U.S. Steel asked Indiana regulators to keep confidential.

Documents released by the University of Chicago's Abrams Environmental Law Clinic show that U.S. Steel's plant in Portage, Indiana, released 56.7 pounds (25.7 kilograms) of chromium on Oct. 25 after a wastewater treatment system malfunction. That's nearly double what the plant is permitted to release of the potentially cancer-causing chemical over 24 hours.

A company official wrote to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management on Oct. 31 asking that its submission about the release "be afforded confidential treatment under all applicable statutes."
 
Law students at the University of Chicago obtained the letter while tracking pollution violations at U.S. Steel and other factories along Lake Michigan as they prepare a planned lawsuit accusing the Pittsburgh-based company of repeatedly violating the federal Clean Water Act since 2011.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Documents-US-Steel-sought-to-keep-chemical-spill-12359468.php

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Documents: US Steel sought to keep chemical spill secret (Original Post) Judi Lynn Nov 2017 OP
They weren't hiding it, they were pursuing their 5th amendment rights!!! marble falls Nov 2017 #1
Why are they allowed to release ANY into the environment?? Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #2
'malfunction,' and they didn't want to discuss elleng Nov 2017 #3
This is what I read Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #4
Wanna read further. elleng Nov 2017 #5
What am I missing?? Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #6
They released it anyway, elleng Nov 2017 #7
According to my caculations they are allowed to release into the enviroment Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #9
I'm not surprised MountCleaners Nov 2017 #8

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
4. This is what I read
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 10:37 PM
Nov 2017

That's nearly double what the plant is permitted to release of the potentially cancer-causing chemical over 24 hours.

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
6. What am I missing??
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 10:42 PM
Nov 2017

They had a spill, over and above what they are allowed to release into the water is what I read

elleng

(130,956 posts)
7. They released it anyway,
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 10:46 PM
Nov 2017

or with 'someone's' permission. Either Steel or Steel+ have some 'splaining to do.

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
9. According to my caculations they are allowed to release into the enviroment
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 10:53 PM
Nov 2017

10,950 lbs into our water per year
unless I reading the article wrong

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Documents: US Steel sough...