Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(51,283 posts)
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 10:09 PM Jan 2018

WH directs Bannon to avoid answering Hill queries in Russia probe

Source: CNN

President Donald Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon faced angry lawmakers from both parties during a contentious interview that stretched more than 10 hours on Tuesday, as he was hit with subpoenas on multiple fronts and was accused by a top Democrat of agreeing to a White House "gag order."

Bannon confirmed to the House Intelligence Committee that he was issued a subpoena from special counsel Robert Mueller to testify before a grand jury, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. He was also slapped with a new subpoena on Tuesday from the committee itself, according to Rep. Mike Conaway, the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia probe, and committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-California, who still signs off on subpoenas.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee, said after the hearing that Bannon was instructed by the White House in advance of the hearing not to respond to certain topics.

The California Democrat said the attorney for Bannon consulted with the White House after the committee subpoena was served Tuesday and was told his client was still not to answer questions regarding the time during the transition and in the White House.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/16/politics/steve-bannon-executive-privilege/index.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mpcamb

(2,870 posts)
1. Headline writers again- What do you mean when you say 'WH directs"?
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 10:13 PM
Jan 2018

orders?
conpels?
requests?
demands?






UpInArms

(51,283 posts)
4. Further into the article
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 10:17 PM
Jan 2018
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said Tuesday that the White House was not concerned with what Bannon might say to Congress or special counsel Robert Mueller's team. But she did not say whether the White House directed Bannon not to answer certain questions.

"As with all congressional inquiries touching upon the White House, Congress must consult with the White House prior to obtaining confidential material," Sanders said. "This is part of a judicially recognized process that goes back decades. We've been cooperating fully with these ongoing investigations and encourage the committees to work with us to find an appropriate accommodation in order to ensure Congress obtains information necessary to its legitimate interests."


(Emphasis mine)

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
3. Executive privilege or Russian Mafia death threats?
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 10:16 PM
Jan 2018

If I were Bannon, I would say what I want to say in private to Mueller.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
6. The irony! Reporter, no problem, "Blab, blab." Congress, "I reserve the right to remain silent."
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 10:27 PM
Jan 2018

Contempt of Congress is what this is called. Won't work for Mueller's grand jury. There, a judge sends you straight to jail.

More_Cowbell

(2,191 posts)
8. Bannon's lawyer represents Priebus and McGahn, who have already flipped
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:37 AM
Jan 2018

He couldn't do that unless Bannon's interests aligned with theirs.

Also, consider that Bannon is the only person the House Intel Committee has tried to compel to talk.

I think that Nunes wants to know what Bannon has said/will say to Mueller, and that's why the committee subpoenaed him.

I think that Mueller is fine with Bannon not giving Trump and his cronies any information, and this exercise was to let Trump think that Bannon won't talk.

Raven123

(4,841 posts)
9. I am thinking the same thing
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 07:35 AM
Jan 2018

Nunes can't run to potus and share Bannon's testimony if he doesn't have it. For Bannon it avoids possibly contradicting himself. For potus, nothing is gained.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
10. Where did you hear that
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 08:26 AM
Jan 2018

Priebus and McGahn have already flipped. That's saying that donnie's CURRENT lawyer is cooperating with Mueller.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»WH directs Bannon to avoi...