Johnson Walks It Back: 'Real Possibility' That 'Secret Society' Text Was A Joke
Source: Talking Points Memo
By Nicole Lafond | January 25, 2018 1:27 pm
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) has spent the past two days peddling his theory that theres a secret society within the FBI holding secret meetings off-site, perpetuating the Republicans campaign to discredit the agency amid its Russia probe. Now, hes open to the real possibility that his proof of the secret society was just a joke.
During an interview with Fox News Tuesday evening, Johnson claimed he had an informant who told him about secret FBI meetings that were held off-site after the 2016 election. He later claimed he borrowed the secret society language from a text exchange between two FBI officials who are at the center of a conservative firestorm over whether theres an anti-Trump bias within the FBI.
ABC News obtained a copy of the text message exchange and reported Wednesday evening that the text in question stands alone in a series of messages and lacks context. ABC and CNN have since concluded that the message was likely a joke. When CNNs Manu Raju asked Thursday whether the text could have been sent in jest, Johnson said: Its a real possibility.
Republicans have been up in arms over these text messages ever since they were released by the Justice Department late last year. The texts were exchanged between two FBI officials who are under suspicion of having an anti-Trump bias and worked for special counsel Robert Muellers investigation. Peter Strzok, a top counterintelligence official, was removed from the probe this summer after the messages were found and former FBI aide Lisa Page had already left the investigation by the time they came out.
-snip-
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/johnson-real-possibility-secret-society-joke
FSogol
(45,584 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)that he's a joke
dawg day
(7,947 posts)These two people were exchanging texts because they were romantically involved. it's not some conspiracy that they were in constant contact and making jokes.
irisblue
(33,054 posts)::Ohio does have some as well, but they haven't said much about this yet.
lkinwi
(1,477 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)order and, on the average, more toward the conservative side. They see a lot of awful things. They deal with a lot of horrible perpetrators. They probably are, in general, not a lot of bleeding hearts. I seriously doubt that the FBI at any time in history has had a liberal bias.
That does not mean that there were necessarily a lot of Trump supporters among the FBI agents or in the Justice Department. But, probably not a lot of Hillary supporters either.
As for the lawyers in the Justice Department, a lot of them could probably make a lot more money in private practice. They are dedicated to law and order and give up a lot to be in the Justice Department, and their political views should be their own business.
And I have said "a lot" more about this than I probably should!
erronis
(15,461 posts)Law enforcement, and especially the FBI, are subject to very rigorous interviews, not just on hire but throughout their career. I have several friends who have worked fairly high up in federal justice/law enforcement and they are personally careful about attitudes and actions.
The same is not true of the congress, or apparently the executive branch. Increasingly it seems that the ticket to power is to show how partisan you can be - towards the rw yelpers.
The Executive Branch is off on its own roller-coaster of inanity. While it might be fun to be in one of the cars, you know the ride will end in a disaster. Just take some more drugs.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)In that sense I mean "conservative." They have to put up with a lot of supervision and rules. It's highly unlikely that they would form a political "secret society" though they might joke about such things because it would seem so crazy to them that it would seem silly.
watoos
(7,142 posts)The judiciary committee, Grassley, is releasing the Trump Jr. testimony, now this.
Something big is coming. I don't understand these 2 events, Wazzup?
VMA131Marine
(4,159 posts)Of course it was a joke.
sandensea
(21,713 posts)Having done so, I'm sure they'll forgive you.
Jim__
(14,094 posts)You know, just to see if it would stick.
jpak
(41,760 posts)yup
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)was actually a group of pro Trump/anti Clinton insiders at the FBI New York office, which was nicknamed Trumplandia
chuckstevens
(1,201 posts)Resign, because you're an embrassment to the State of Wisconsin!
awesomerwb1
(4,269 posts)It's already out on Faux and conspiracy sister sites so he accomplished his objective.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)apnu
(8,759 posts)Mr. Ected
(9,675 posts)These theatrics insinuate a much darker purpose than mere obfuscation or obstruction.
They're perps, and they're dissembling.