After elk crashes copter, some question wildlife chopper use
Source: Associated Press
Lindsay Whitehurst, Associated Press
Updated 5:00 pm, Wednesday, February 14, 2018
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) The case of an elk that died after it leapt in the air and brought a low-flying research helicopter down in Utah highlights the use of helicopters in wildlife monitoring, which has been criticized by animal-rights groups but praised as effective by wildlife managers.
The sound of the chopper blades and the wind kicked up by the helicopters can be terrifying for animals, said Jennifer Best with the group Friends of Animals.
"They're loud and they're scary and it's dangerous to the various wildlife that's impacted, and, as this demonstrates, can also be dangerous to the personnel who are operating the helicopter," she said.
She called for the use of less-invasive monitoring tools, like cameras or video monitoring.
Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/science/article/After-elk-crash-activists-question-wildlife-12614367.php
ffr
(22,670 posts)Same for cars (metal rolling machines) v. forest wildlife (coyotes, deer, bears, etc). They don't know what these things are. There's no evolutionary correlation for them to draw upon.
truthisfreedom
(23,147 posts)Seriously!
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Much better craft for studying animals without terrorizing them.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)... to drop a net on an elk to capture it. They were going to put some kind of tracking device on the elk when the elk objected to the operation.
Interesting that the operation was funded by hunting license fees. At least it's not tax dollars.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,346 posts)Only people who live with continuous noise would "praise" helicopters.
Damn things should be banned from rural and wilderness areas.
Abu Pepe
(637 posts)I have been 'saying that for years.