Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 12:55 AM Jun 2018

Publisher of National Enquirer Subpoenaed in Michael Cohen Probe

Source: Wall Street Journal

Federal authorities have subpoenaed the publisher of the National Enquirer for records related to its $150,000 payment to a former Playboy model for the rights to her story alleging an affair with Donald Trump, according to people familiar with the matter.

***
Investigators are probing any potential efforts by Cohen to suppress damaging information about Trump during the presidential campaign, including whether he coordinated with American Media to pay McDougal and then not publish her account, other people familiar with the matter said.

Prosecutors are examining whether the payment violated campaign-finance or other laws, the people said. American Media hasn’t been accused of wrongdoing, and the company has denied paying McDougal to suppress her story.

***
Ms. McDougal has said publicly that she had a nearly yearlong affair with Mr. Trump beginning in 2006. The tactic of paying for a story but not publishing it is known in the tabloid world as “catch and kill,” The Wall Street Journal previously reported.

Read more: https://www.wsj.com/articles/publisher-of-national-enquirer-subpoenaed-in-michael-cohen-probe-1529529151?mod=mktw



The article also says that if investigators find evidence that Mr. Cohen coordinated with American Media to buy Ms. McDougal’s story to protect Trump’s campaign, prosecutors could bring charges against Cohen and/or the company, since that is providing "something of value" for the campaign.

Trump and the head of the company, Pecker (if you can believe that name) are long time friends. He was known by employees in the company as a FOP (Friend of Pecker). The employees called him that because they weren't allowed to turn in articles that painted Trump in a bad light...because he was a FOP.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Publisher of National Enquirer Subpoenaed in Michael Cohen Probe (Original Post) Honeycombe8 Jun 2018 OP
The nadir or can the saidsimplesimon Jun 2018 #1
You know, I had noticed recently... forgotmylogin Jun 2018 #2
I've noted that trend too. Hugin Jun 2018 #3
Now that you mention it... JohnnyRingo Jun 2018 #5
Unfortunately, it sounds kind of thin. JohnnyRingo Jun 2018 #4
I sort of agree with you. Not for the reasons you give, though. Honeycombe8 Jun 2018 #10
Good point n/t JohnnyRingo Jun 2018 #15
The KGOP republican "paper of official lies" Achilleaze Jun 2018 #6
Seems like its about time! nt 7962 Jun 2018 #7
Need to start boycotting this worthless paper, especially since they helped ... SWBTATTReg Jun 2018 #8
I don't have to boycott it. I've never bought one of those rags in my life!!! Honeycombe8 Jun 2018 #11
Good points...I used to buy (I'm embarrassed) 25 years ago and then got tired of the ... SWBTATTReg Jun 2018 #12
But "news" & gossip about celebs isn't what it's about. Honeycombe8 Jun 2018 #16
But but but... BATBOY! truthisfreedom Jun 2018 #13
Weekly World News, nm. truthisfreedom Jun 2018 #14
K&R! orangecrush Jun 2018 #9

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
1. The nadir or can the
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 01:07 AM
Jun 2018

Republican Party sink even lower in their adulation of a moral degenerate who appears to be mentally unstable? Bannon is an anarchist who runs the show? Ain't it sad?

forgotmylogin

(7,453 posts)
2. You know, I had noticed recently...
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 01:24 AM
Jun 2018

...since I spend a lot of time waiting in line, the last few issues of the Enquirer *seemed* to drop all the political stuff and delve back into celebrity gossip. Wonder if they were trying to lay low when they discovered they might be implicated.

Hugin

(32,413 posts)
3. I've noted that trend too.
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 01:45 AM
Jun 2018

Also gone are the Clinton smears... They may still be inside, but, I haven't even picked one up in decades.

JohnnyRingo

(18,511 posts)
4. Unfortunately, it sounds kind of thin.
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 01:54 AM
Jun 2018

The burden of proof that the Trump campaign benefited monetarily from the catch & kill tactic is difficult at best, and The Enquirer by necessity has a crack legal team.

I'd love to see the Trump lap dog and King of Fake News go the way of Gawker, if only so I don't have to suffer their headlines in line at the Dollar General, but I think they'll weather this one. Better men have tried to take them down, so to speak.

On edit:
I imagine this subpoena for testimony may have more to do with bringing down Cohen than The Enquirer.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
10. I sort of agree with you. Not for the reasons you give, though.
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 08:52 AM
Jun 2018

The campaign doesn't have to benefit "monetarily." It just has to receive something of value. If it does, it has to report that.

The real problem is that for a criminal charge, the burden of proof is reasonable doubt. It'd be hard to prove that Cohen actually collaborated w/the company to gain "something of value" for the campaign. They may be able to prove it as to Trump personally, or maybe they can't prove it's sufficiently "something of value."

I think the main benefit will be that the information may become accessible to McDougal in her CIVIL lawsuit, where the burden of proof is more lenient, and it is to prove something else. She only has to prove her case by a tilt of the scales, and she has to prove I guess that she was duped and deprived of her story being published, as well as fraud by Cohen. Nothing to do with the campaign.

But you never know what evidence ends up being important. If yu would have said back in the day that Capone would be imprisoned for tax evasion, you would have been laughed out of the room.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
6. The KGOP republican "paper of official lies"
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 04:47 AM
Jun 2018

the National Enquirer, well known for lies, is one of the official KGOP republican propaganda spigots...

SWBTATTReg

(21,610 posts)
8. Need to start boycotting this worthless paper, especially since they helped ...
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 07:43 AM
Jun 2018

interfere in the elections of this country. I always thought the N.E. was worthless, strictly for entertainment only, and now that I hear that they actually interfered w/ the election in 2016 by buying up and suppressing stories negative to rump.

This is worse than just providing entertainment.

This is outright suppression of news critical to the 2016 elections, by using the N.E. to locate and identify news critical of rump and thus worthy of suppression via nondisclosure agreements (NDAs), and thus, this doesn't allow this paper to have 'freedom of the press' rights and the protections associated w/ such freedoms.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
11. I don't have to boycott it. I've never bought one of those rags in my life!!!
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 08:53 AM
Jun 2018

I'm not sure WHO buys yellow journalism rags like that. I've never even seen someone buy one. So whoever buys them, buys them in secret, I guess.

SWBTATTReg

(21,610 posts)
12. Good points...I used to buy (I'm embarrassed) 25 years ago and then got tired of the ...
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 09:14 AM
Jun 2018

ridiculous claims and stuff such as UFOs, giant insects, etc. and quit buying (my partner and I).

I'm surprised to even see these papers in the grocery stores still today, I guess that there is still a market for celeb. news and the like, but I am over news such as the latest haircut by Cher, blah, blah, blah.

I guess life has a way of bringing one down to earth, thank goodness!

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
16. But "news" & gossip about celebs isn't what it's about.
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 04:16 PM
Jun 2018

Yellow journalism IS truly fake news. It's not real. If there's a story about Cher's haircut, it probably isn't a real haircut or photo. It has stories of kangaroos giving birth to humans, aliens landing, & other false outrageous stories. None of it's real.

I did used to buy People Magazine, Cosmo, Glamour, things like that. Those contain gossip about celebs, esp People Mag.

I had to stop doing that, though...I was pending way too much money on impulse buys of magazines. Then, with the internet, there was no need. I had been a sucker for decorating magazines. I finally broke that habit.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Publisher of National Enq...