FBI: Man planning alleged Cleveland attack wanted to give explosive-filled cars to military children
Source: USA Today
The FBI said Monday that Demetrius Nathaniel Pitts also known as Abdur Raheem Rafeeq was taken into custody Sunday morning on accusations of attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization. Last week, Pitts, 48, of Maple Heights, Ohio, allegedly told an undercover agent: "I did tell myself that their holiday is coming up. The Fourth of July. Independence Day. What would hit them in the core? Blow up. Have a bomb. Blow up at the Fourth of July parade."
Authorities say Pitts, an American citizen, talked about hitting targets such as St. John's Cathedral and giving remote control cars packed with explosives to the children of military members.
According to court documents, in a Jan. 25, 2017, Facebook post, Pitts commented on photos believed to be from an al-Qaida training camp. "We as Muslim(s) need to start. Training like this every," the post said. "Look at the bed blue-eyed devils. They teach their little dogs on how to shoot and hunt. ... We should always be prepared to fight in the name of Allah Akbar. All cowards stay home."
Anthony said Pitts' adult criminal history dates back to 1989 when Pitts was 19. He was charged in Hamilton County with aggravated robbery and felonious assault, convicted of robbery and sentenced to three to 15 years in prison. Records show he served less than a year in prison and was released on probation.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/07/02/terror-suspect-arrest-cleveland/750294002/
kimbutgar
(21,237 posts)OR is the FBI still considered inadequate and fake?
Judi Lynn
(160,656 posts)ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)Why is there a distinction between foreign and domestic terrorist organizations? USA Today/Susan Page, conservative d-bags.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)I don't like any violence against anyone. The media soft hands domestic terrorism. The media is reluctant to even use the term domestic terrorism. Look back into USA Today's history into reporting terrorism. How is the domestic terrorism labeled by them? Rarely as 'domestic'. We should not only be alarmed/angry/active against all terrorism, but it should demand that media cover it all as though it is all equally unacceptable. Why isn't the Capital shooter labeled as a domestic terrorist? His dealings with the newspaper and association with alt right terrorist groups suggest that if he were foreign, he would be described as a terrorist.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)Even if that's what's pissing you off (which is strange in and of itself considering the article is about blowing up children), you're mad at the wrong entity. Newspapers don't draw the distinction; the legal code does.
RussBLib
(9,048 posts)as long as you call domestic terrorism domestic terrorism when it happens, of course, but I think we have seen many instances where domestic terrorism was labeled only as a "mental health issue" or some such malarky.
It constantly gets under my skin when I read these reports. I go from reading to simply inform myself to feeling like I am wasting my time reading something so obviously slanted toward Republican or establishment propaganda.
marble falls
(57,405 posts)Jose Garcia
(2,610 posts)organizations:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2339B
Girard442
(6,087 posts)...I'd wonder how actively involved the undercover agent was in egging him on. One would hope not at all.
sinkingfeeling
(51,485 posts)Response to MadDAsHell (Original post)
Post removed
irisblue
(33,041 posts)Cha
(297,911 posts)Response to irisblue (Reply #11)
Post removed
marble falls
(57,405 posts)claims so much insight about other long termed members here.