Senate Democrats Have Referred A Secret Letter About Brett Kavanaugh To The FBI
Source: BuzzFeed
Senate Democrats on the Judiciary Committee have referred a letter concerning Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh to the FBI.
The contents of the letter have been closely guarded by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, as well as California Rep. Anna Eshoo, who originally received the letter and shared it with Feinstein, according to sources familiar with the matter. But whispers of what it contains have made the rounds across Capitol Hill over the past week.
The attention on it burst into the public when The Intercept published a report on the rumors surrounding the letter on Wednesday.
This matter has been referred to the FBI for investigation, Sen. Dick Durbin told BuzzFeed News when asked about the letter on Thursday.
BuzzFeed News contacted the woman believed to be the subject of the letter at her home last week. She declined to comment. BuzzFeed News has not been able to confirm the contents of the letter.
Read more: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/lissandravilla/senate-democrats-have-sent-a-secret-letter-about-brett
watoos
(7,142 posts)Clarence Thomas is living proof of that.
sdfernando
(4,935 posts)if it also involves a paid abortion then I think things will get really interesting.
Abortion?
RainCaster
(10,870 posts)Racerdog1
(808 posts)To keep this slimey ass right wing asshole off of the supreme court.
DavidDvorkin
(19,475 posts)Maybe it's a nothingburger.
Right now, it's a rather juicy nothingburger.
ffr
(22,669 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I can't imagine what it would be. However, we know from his background, including all the way back to his joining the Ken Starr investigation, that he's not a man of good character, has broken the law before, and is the kind of person who's prone to extremely conservative views and the kind of dishonesty and ruthlessness required to advance them.
I hope it's not related to sex in any way. The Republicans use that to swiftboat so often that their voters will be unable to even consider that we aren't doing the same.
Something with documents would be nice. Accepting bribes, graft, embezzlement.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Gambling or Ruling on Trump casino.
If it went to the FBI, I not expecting a nothingburger.
Gore1FL
(21,130 posts)C Moon
(12,212 posts)Putin doesn't care much about their background and getting them electedso long as they will join in the puppet show.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)Just yet another middle finger from the GOP to america - "we know he is a brazen, partisan POS, and we are putting him up because we can."
watoos
(7,142 posts)it's pretty obvious to everyone. Why didn't Trump just nominate Rudy, I mean Rudy has experience wearing gowns.
volstork
(5,400 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)Is it from a constituent? Or maybe it is someone that Eshoo knows personally and the sender knew she would take the letter seriously.
Her district includes Silicon Valley.
Hmmm. I'm looking for clues.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Porn
Link to tweet
The fact that: 1) letter went to a CA House Rep 2) Difi is involved 3) questions to Kavanaugh asking if Judge Kozinski ever sent him porn... Im going to leave this July 11th thread right here
Link to tweet
Pages 244-246 Kavanaugh categorically denies any and all allegations that the Judge may have sent him porn
Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)I'd bark up that tree too.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)after being caught up in the sending and forwarding of pornmail. Both Michael Eakin (R) and Seamus McCafferty (D, Eagles Court fame) were forced out because they were entangled in the pornmail chains that originated in the PA Atty Gen's office under Corbett.
IIRC, neither of them requested or originated the pornmails, they just got them and shared some.
If this issue is being referred to the FBI, my additional guess is that if it is porn, it may be porn involving underage kids.
PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)I'm not sure if I'd go with the underage porn (please let it not be that).
But, if he did share porn, and it was on a government issued computer, then possibly I can see the FBI taking a look since District Courts fall under the DOJ.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)unless it would involve children ...
Can't rule anything out with these lunatics at this point, but ...
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)Kavanaugh did in high school. I would think the statute of limitations would apply, but if it is involving high school age kids, that's likely involving an underage girl. That would make sense for the FBI to be involved then.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)That seems like something that would be a referral to a state AG.
Sandusky didn't get prosecuted by the FBI, the AG empaneled a grand jury.
john657
(1,058 posts)The only action they've taken is to pass the letter on to the WH to include it in Kavanaugh's background file.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)but also have to provide it as part of background info to their background check client, the WH.
The FBI is wearing two hats here, one as background checkers and the other as investigators of a potential crime.
john657
(1,058 posts)an investigation into the allegation.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)The FBI is still obligated to check out the information. That is according to Frank Figluzzi on Maddow's show tonight.
john657
(1,058 posts)further plus, the author of the letter wants to remain anonymous and wants no further action taken.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)The reason Di Fi sent it to the FBI is that she didn't know what else to do with it.
If it involves something that happened in high school (the rumor I heard was he locked a girl in a room during a party) what is she supposed to do with it? If she gives it to the local attorney general, it goes nowhere because of statute of limitations.
If she sits on it, she's a villain for hiding damaging information. So she turned it over to the FBI. They said thanks, we'll put this in his file.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)The document in the tweet has a section with DiFi quesitoning Kavanaugh about his knowledge of Judge Kozinski's sexual harassment. He testified under oath that he had no knowledge prior to it coming out in public. If one of the complainants wrote the letter to notify DiFi that Kavanaugh KNEW about the harassment at the time it happened, then Kavanaugh perjured himself.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)degree of believability or credibility. This one seems to warrant investigation. Not a witch hunt, in other words
Timmygoat
(779 posts)Could it be some wild theory, made by the rethugs to in some way accuse the dems of spreading lies about the nominee? That way they could say the dems would do anything to stop the vote.
truthisfreedom
(23,146 posts)Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)The woman is now being represented by an attorney and the attorney has advised her not to speak about it. There was an OP about it yesterday but I can't find it now.
Hekate
(90,673 posts)getagrip_already
(14,742 posts)many people.
too funny. That made me belly laugh.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Some say, I heard...
PunkinPi
(4,875 posts)Link to tweet
This article works really hard to imply, without directly saying, that Feinstein is sitting on a letter that implicates Kavanaugh in a sexual harassment or assault scandal from his youth. https://theintercept.com/2018/09/12/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-dianne-feinstein/
8:29 PM - Sep 12, 2018
https://theintercept.com/2018/09/12/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-dianne-feinstein/
From The Intercept article (link above):
getagrip_already
(14,742 posts)it must be something he can be prosecuted for now.
maybe the woman was a child at the time. But then it would be a state police matter, not an fbi matter.
It has to have something to do with federal law, and it has to be current enough to be prosecuted.....
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)If it was something sexual, unless it would be something that was pretty broad sweeping, crossed state lines, child porn ring or something, you are correct, does not explain why the FBI would involved.
PunkinPi
(4,875 posts)Prospective justices are put through the nations most thorough background check, an invasive process where nothing is off-limits. After all, a surprise dredged up later could scuttle confirmation. So candidates taxes, writings, childhoods, business dealings, medical histories and, yes, love lives, are all scrutinized for potential red flags.
That means that federal investigators may have asked Kavanaugh questions about any crimes he may have committed or been accused of, as well as questions about past romantic relationships. If Kavanaugh had been accused of criminal activityparticularly sexual misconductin his past, and he lied about it during the vetting process, that itself could be grounds for criminal charges for providing a false statement to federal investigators.
https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/this-could-be-why-dems-went-to-fbi-over-mysterious-kavanaugh-letter/
getagrip_already
(14,742 posts)I didn't know that.
But it begs the question. How did DiFi know?
She certainly wouldn't be privy to questions the FBI did or didn't ask, so how would she know he lied to the FBI?
Still, very interesting. Since it would also cover his prior testimony to congressional committee's.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)GOPers do not care. GOPer's Gawd always forgives them no matter what. They are Gawd's chosen in the good ole USA.
GOPers are above the law say religious psychos because, no law is above their Gawd's law.
Thanks for the additional information , and the SC justice procedure have been tainted starting in most part with Garland.
onetexan
(13,040 posts)4139
(1,893 posts)ScratchCat
(1,988 posts)"from his youth" be beyond the statute of limitations? This has to be something other than someone making an allegation that he did something many years ago, or it wouldn't be forwarded to the FBI. Those would be State crimes anyway. I know nothing and hate to start rumors by speculation, but it either has to be a)something more recent than "in his youth" or b)has something to do with perjury. A likely theory is that BK forwarded her the porn he claims he never received from that judge - thus he perjured himself.
watoos
(7,142 posts)how old the girl was. There are ways around the statute of limitations if this happened in California.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)Not sure why the FBI would be referred, if it happened in Cali, that would be a referral to the state ag.
PunkinPi
(4,875 posts)IphengeniaBlumgarten
(328 posts)Suppose things like blackmail or threats of bodily harm for speaking out? That might explain the FBI's current involvement. But, as I say, this is speculation.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Past the statute of limitations. Lying to federal law enforcement is a crime in itself.
Mr.Bill
(24,284 posts)about six months after he is confirmed and sitting on the Supreme Court.
Farmer-Rick
(10,163 posts)The criminal is firmly ensconced in a position of power.
Just don't let those emails from the state dept be routed through a non government server or else they may act on every imaginary issue.
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)And if Clarence Thomas was able to get on the court with Anita Hill talking about it in front of the Judiciary committee, an anonymous letter is even less likely to affect the outcome of this nomination.
NJCher
(35,662 posts)the thinking on this matter is considerably different now. If you doubt it, Google "CBS executives fired."
Calista241
(5,586 posts)CBS executives were dealing with public opinion, public backlash, and moral obligation.
trueblue2007
(17,217 posts)Hekate
(90,673 posts)...they should send out a senior official saying "No evidence of Judge Kavanaugh fcking goats recently has been found." Otherwise people will be left to wonder.
trueblue2007
(17,217 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)He reported that he had been told about the letter last Friday, but he thought it would never become public because the writer had asked to remain anonymous and did not want to get involved. O'Donnell said the incident involves sexual assault of a minor (both could have been minors) when Kavanaugh was in high school.
Frank Figluzzi was on with Maddow and he thought that with as many background checks as Kavanaugh has been through that the FBI might already have checked this out somewhere down the line. In fact, he said he'd be surprised if they hadn't run across it at some point. However, if this incident happened when Kavanaugh was a teenager and the victim was too scared or ashamed to come forward until now, I can't see how the FBI would have been aware. I seriously doubt any of Kavanaugh's friends or classmates (all males) who might have known would've ratted him out.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities, she said.
A source who said they were briefed on the contents of the letter said it described an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman that took place when both were 17 years old and at a party. According to the source, Kavanaugh and a male friend had locked her in a room against her will, making her feel threatened, but she was able to get out of the room. The Guardian has not verified the apparent claims in the letter. It is not yet clear who wrote it.
While additional details about the letter were scarce, two media outlets have reported that the person who wrote the letter is being represented by an attorney, Debra Katz, who has been described in media reports as Washingtons #MeToo lawyer.
Katz has not responded to a request for comment from the Guardian. BuzzFeed reported that she was seen on Capitol Hill on Wednesday night, shortly after the Intercept first reported the existence of the letter.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)and made whatever happened out to be more serious than this, although scary, would seem to be.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)I can't think of a single person that didn't have a fumbling, awkward, tentative first sexual encounter as a teenager. There's no classes that teach people how to get to first or second base.