Nancy Pelosi calls Brett Kavanaugh "hysterical," says he is unfit to serve on the Supreme Court
Source: CBS News
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh "hysterical" and said that he was temperamentally unfit to serve on the Supreme Court. Pelosi made the comments in an interview Saturday at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin, Texas.
"I couldn't help but think that if a woman had ever performed that way, they would say 'hysterical,'" Pelosi said about her reaction to Kavanaugh's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. Kavanaugh emotionally denied allegations that he had sexually assaulted Dr. Christine Blasey Ford when they were both teenagers.
During his opening statement, Kavanaugh was very emotional, at times nearly shouting and choking up while discussing his family and his high school years. He also explicitly condemned Democrats on the committee, calling the allegations against him a "grotesque and coordinated character assassination" organized by liberals angry that Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 presidential election.
<snip>
"I think that he disqualifies himself with those statements and the manner in which he went after the Clintons and the Democrats," she said.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nancy-pelosi-calls-brett-kavanaugh-hysterical-says-he-is-unfit-to-serve-on-the-supreme-court/
Me.
(35,454 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)Did anyone also notice his sniffing? It was like a nervous tick. He did it virtually after every statement.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Rudi does
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... some sort of alcohol withdrawal symptom... or some sort of self-comforting action?
iluvtennis
(19,852 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)but I think he needed a drink in the worst way
pazzyanne
(6,552 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)got the sniffing thing down as you know by now.
trump and kavanaugh.. two vultures of a feather.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)dalton99a
(81,485 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,926 posts)The Dems are being accused of holding "political" grudges against the nominee - and he comes out with THAT bullshit!?!?!
AUTOMATIC "YOU'RE GONE!"
(will we ever survive all of this seemingly never-ending nightmare?)
Cha
(297,196 posts)ffr
(22,669 posts)Blue Owl
(50,360 posts)n.t
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)The word that means "uterus". Hysterical=girly
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)Kavanaugh will blow a gasket over this because not only is a woman saying this, but it's cool, calm, and collected Nancy Pelosi.
He's probably throwing things around the room after seeing this.
Response to Snake Plissken (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Mr.Bill
(24,284 posts)a handful of times on national TV.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)are no laughing matter
BootinUp
(47,144 posts)calimary
(81,239 posts)Let 'em get all hysterical about it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Remember how they laughed when Hillary said there was a right wing conspiracy? Now they support someone saying the equivalent.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)reACTIONary
(5,770 posts).... and it was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vast_right-wing_conspiracy
sheshe2
(83,754 posts)He was a widdle boy throwing a temper tantrum.
Paladin
(28,256 posts)Talk about doing the left a favor. We can dine out on Kavanaugh for the rest of his blighted life.
OMGWTF
(3,955 posts)Response to Paladin (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)There's no way to know yet if Kavanaugh is going down. And DT said that they don't have a Plan B.
NJCher
(35,667 posts)And burst out laughing. Said he didnt need a Plan B.
Cher
Cha
(297,196 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)Delta Kappa Epsilon (DKE) frat brothers. He screeched, pouted and cried like a little 5-yr old kindergarten girl. DKEs aren't supposed to look like that -- that's how their female victims are supposed to look. That is, Dr. Ford in her own way, put a thumping on Kav's nose and mouth that made him look like a DKE victim. Had his TV make-up running all over his face.
Maybe testifying AFTER Dr. Ford was a bad idea. She got into his head and twisted his mind.
The event was so traumatic for Kav that he may start stuttering or developing an eye tick. Thankfully for Kav, those two conditions can be suppressed by always holding and sipping a cold bottle of beer. (That's how GW Bush was able to perform his job in the White House.) Let's all watch Kav for that.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)"Maybe testifying AFTER Dr. Ford was a bad idea. She got into his head and twisted his mind."
They didn't want to give her what they thought would be the advantage of going last. Hehehe.
unitedwethrive
(1,997 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....to describe her, Hillary Clinton, and other female Democrats. Very well calculated!
Rebl2
(13,501 posts)So why didnt the Rs say the same thing about Kavanaugh? Guess if a man acts that way its just fine-he has a right to. For a woman to do the same, well there must be something wrong with her or shes out of control. They are such hypocrites, but we already know that.
True_Blue
(3,063 posts)riversedge
(70,208 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts).....one of the privileges of privileged men is they get to act all PMS-y and all rapey if and when either is needed. Come'on Nancy.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)She shouldn't have said, "if he were a woman." She should have just called him hysterical directly. Just like they do to women.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)She took the route that assumes the American Public are on the 'less bright side' when it comes to picking up on sarcasm. And that's probably not an unreasonable assumption.
yardwork
(61,604 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)I am not even sure this is a gender based double standard. I don't think a Democratic man could have gotten away with that either.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,957 posts)CCExile
(468 posts)And he should smile more!
spooky3
(34,447 posts)jalan48
(13,864 posts)meadowlander
(4,395 posts)that a woman who behaved the same way would be called hysterical.
spooky3
(34,447 posts)sentence--again, she was careful simply to imply her meaning rather than call Kavanaugh "hysterical" outright:
"It's not time for a hysterical, biased person to go to the court and expect us to say, 'isn't that wonderful,'" Pelosi said.
And I would have loved for someone to say, "there was blood coming out of his eyes..." or some male equivalent to it, but of course Dems cannot say something like that. Only Trump gets away with it.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)RussBLib
(9,008 posts)that anger, coupled with hyper-partisanship, has no place on the SCOTUS. Hopefully some Republicans now see that clearly.
Pinkflamingo
(177 posts)I wrote to Rubio with the Resist Bot.
For the resist bot for your cell, just text Resist to 50409
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,156 posts)Roberts may be right wing 90% of the time, but he abhors politicization of the court.
grumpyduck
(6,232 posts)after a performance like that, I wouldn't vote for him for SCOTUS even if he were a Democrat. That was an embarrassment.
NJCher
(35,667 posts)One cant be smart and behave like he did. He made a total fool of himself.
Cher
DFW
(54,372 posts)Sure enough. It was just Kavanaugh blowing steam. He was a legacy, His dad and grandfather were alumni.
But I know that legacy alumni are often as not a complete hit-or-miss proposition, often depending on the size of their family donations more than whether the next generation is completely qualified. E.g. my family had 3 generations of Harvard students, several distinguished ones among them. But my family used up all available cash paying today's high tuition, so they didn't have huge sums to make in alumni donations. Whaddya know, none of our kids got in. It didn't matter, they all did fine in the colleges they did go to, and got cool jobs. And anyway, I'd rather have kids that turned out like my brother's or mine than kids who turned out like W or Kavanawful.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)scarytomcat
(1,706 posts)he should be impeached from the DC court
Response to scarytomcat (Reply #48)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)DFW
(54,372 posts)Trump doesn't vote in the Senate, Senators do. In your opening statement, you don't blast the party with 49 Senators and, by name, a former President and the candidate that won 63 million votes in the last election if you are trying to sell yourself as an impartial jurist who will spend the rest of his life interpreting the Constitution fairly for all 350 million citizens. Whining about the Clintons (for trolls who only understand Republicanese: "the Clinton's" ) is only going to please the one person who told you to say it, and even Melania doesn't listen to him any more.
See my post 62.
Cher
calimary
(81,239 posts)Seems pretty doggone accurate as a description of the behavior I myself saw the other day when I watched him in the afternoon hearing.
What else could you possibly call it?
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Nitram
(22,796 posts)Joe Bacon
(5,165 posts)He's "HER"sterical too!