US sues California over net neutrality law

[laserhaas]

Source: AP

Link to tweet

.

The Trump administration has sued California over a new law imposing net neutrality protections.

The lawsuit filed Sunday by the U.S. Department of Justice came roughly an hour after Gov. Jerry Brown signed the law.

The Federal Communications Commission last year repealed rules preventing internet companies from exercising more control over what people watch and see on the internet.

Read more: https://www.google.com/amp/s/apnews.com/amp/5f91111e4a2b4c72852da2ef2b3cc76f

---

California Governor, Jerry Brown, signs Net Neutrality BILL

https://www.google.com/amp/s/gazette.com/ap/california-governor-signs-tough-net-neutrality-bill/article_3c1fe48a-ce89-5d4d-85bf-92c2db98464b.amp.html

Link to tweet

.

Link to tweet

.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

1. Thread title is not the article title nor matches tweet. No link to article. . . . nt

[laserhaas]

2. The article title came from the Tweet

The article I (sub) posted - isn't the AP article.

Update is forthcoming...

[Bernardo de La Paz]

6. Only because you edited the thread title after I posted, as is readily apparent from the record. .nt

[laserhaas]

8. Puhhhllleeeaaassseee

The Tweet alert came to me; and the title was exact to the Tweet (if you take time to notice, the AP Tweet provided no article link - and I did post that the link would be "forthcoming&quot

As noted, the current working title is almost exact to the Tweet title.

There was no slight.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

11. Original title as you posted: "BREAKING: Justice Dept. sues CA overheat Neutrality BILL"

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=thread&address=10142168816&info=1#recs

Title was not exact to the tweet when you posted at 12:06.

Then I posted at 12:10.

Then you edited at 12:14 when you corrected the title, changing "heat" to " net" and "BILL" to "law", an action which you now bizarrely deny.

The Google "amp" link you post goes to an article about supervised injection drug laws.
Here is the real link without the Google tracking "amp" stuff you neglected to trim out: https://apnews.com/5f91111e4a2b4c72852da2ef2b3cc76f But it is of course the article about supervised injection drug laws.

[laserhaas]

16. LOOK at the Tweet - It waz AP Title in the Tweet

Once we had the link to the AP article (which AP initially failed to provide) - The thread was then - updated.

Shheesshh

[Bernardo de La Paz]

22. I certainly did look at the tweet, which never said "overheat". That's why I made my first post.

You posted a garbled title with the word "overheat". I pointed it out. You corrected it and objected to my pointing it out. Sheesh yourself. LOL.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

23. And your AP news link still points to the Drug Injection article & still give Google tracking. . .nt

[laserhaas]

25. You need a time out

The title is correct and makes same point as original.

Let it go!

[laserhaas]

3. As is readily apparent, the AP Tweet title and article title

Are NOT - a breed, apart

[Bernardo de La Paz]

7. Only because you added to the OP after I posted, as is readily apparent from the record. .nt

[Hoyt]

4. State Rights are only good when they keep minorities out of tax supported schools and public

facilities.


Sarcasm Thingie, if needed.

[laserhaas]

5. We like - thingy's

[laserhaas]

9. Governor Brown is doing a lot more, as Gov - then, as AG

Link to tweet

?s=19

[Rhiannon12866]

10. Follow up Tweet, Washington Post story:

Link to tweet

[LiberalLovinLug]

12. See, these are the issues we can fight them on. Againt the GOP, not Trump

Too much is directed at Trump. If this is explained properly, without the holier than thou tone. Explained in layman terms what Republicans are trying to do and how that effects ALL internet users, not just Democrats.

[laserhaas]

15. Concur!

Unity is the key.

None of U.S. want the net quashed

Except those who want the facts quashed.

[msongs]

13. twitter is not a news source nt

[laserhaas]

19. Beg your pardon! - You may state Twitter is not MSM

But the banter that Twitter is not a source, for news, is just - plain - bull.

News is the revelation of facts from a source, having exposure capacity, en mass.

Amore prudent remark is that MSM tends not to be news.

Any agenda on Twitter tends to fail, immediately.

Whereas agenda on MSM often succeeds (case in point, the Donald); because it is incessant and pervasive.

[obamanut2012]

20. Agreed -- best info and breaking news source is twitter imo

[laserhaas]

26. We get more ratio of truth - quicker there - than MSM

👍

[C Moon]

14. Putin doesn't like California.

[Xolodno]

17. Thinking the Fed has this one in the bag...particularly if they get what...

...they want on the Supreme Court.

But part of me is wondering if this is a trap for the Dump Admin. They go nuts, sue California, get the Supreme Court to rule in their favor and California can't impose net neutrality. So, California then creates a massive tax on companies that do not have net neutrality. It's in the state's interest to tax revenues gained by "sales" due to no net neutrality. Basically, tax for profit internet providers...and minimal or no tax for non-profit internet providers.

[laserhaas]

18. Catch 22

[ck4829]

21. Kick

[the_sly_pig]

24. But...but States rights!!!

[TygrBright]

27. Ninth Amendment, Ninth Amendment, Ninth Amendment- Go ***k yerself JeffyBeau. n/t

[laserhaas]

28. Truth has a welcome forum, on the web. Especially via

Social Media outlets.

That's why the powers that be, seek to rein in, the net.