Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Sun Oct 21, 2018, 08:31 PM Oct 2018

Special counsel examines conflicting accounts as scrutiny of Roger Stone and WikiLeaks deepens

Source: Washington Post

In recent weeks, a grand jury in Washington has listened to more than a dozen hours of testimony and FBI technicians have pored over gigabytes of electronic messages as part of the special counsel’s quest to solve one burning mystery: Did longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone — or any other associate of the president — have advance knowledge of WikiLeaks’ plans to release hacked Democratic emails in 2016?

While outwardly quiet for the last month, Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have been aggressively pursuing leads behind the scenes about whether Stone was in communication with the online group, whose disclosures of emails believed to have been hacked by Russian operatives disrupted the 2016 presidential campaign, according to people familiar with the special counsel probe.

Stone, who boasted during the race that he was in touch with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, has said since that his past comments were exaggerated or misunderstood. Both he and WikiLeaks have adamantly denied they were in contact.

However, prosecutors are closely examining both public comments and alleged private assertions that Stone made in 2016 suggesting he had a way to reach Assange, the people said.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/special-counsel-examines-conflicting-accounts-as-scrutiny-of-roger-stone-and-wikileaks-deepens/2018/10/21/db9ab1c2-bde5-11e8-be70-52bd11fe18af_story.html?utm_term=.a2df85b23633



Get Me Roger Stone

It has to be Indictment Week
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Special counsel examines conflicting accounts as scrutiny of Roger Stone and WikiLeaks deepens (Original Post) MelissaB Oct 2018 OP
... another snip MelissaB Oct 2018 #1
His turn is coming very soon dalton99a Oct 2018 #2
let's dedicate this to Roger Stone.... Grasswire2 Oct 2018 #3
+1 dalton99a Oct 2018 #4
If he does get indicted, it won't be this week fountainofyouth Oct 2018 #5
K&R Scurrilous Oct 2018 #6

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
1. ... another snip
Sun Oct 21, 2018, 08:34 PM
Oct 2018

“I remember saying, ‘Roger, I thought you had a back channel,’” Credico said. “He said something to the effect of, ‘Yes, but I can’t use him all the time.’” Credico relayed that account to the grand jury last month, according to a person familiar with his testimony.

Stone at first denied Credico’s claim that he suggested having a conduit to reach WikiLeaks, calling his old friend a “perjurer” and saying he’d relish the opportunity to confront Credico in court.

Later, Stone acknowledged to The Post that he “obliquely” told Credico in an email that he had “a second source” of WikiLeaks information besides the New York comedian.

He told The Post that person was not a direct conduit to WikiLeaks. He said he was referring to information another associate passed to him from a journalist who wrote in a July 2016 email that he had heard WikiLeaks would be releasing information related to the Clinton Foundation.

fountainofyouth

(409 posts)
5. If he does get indicted, it won't be this week
Sun Oct 21, 2018, 11:01 PM
Oct 2018

Or, at least, it won't be announced this week. Not until after the election.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Special counsel examines ...