Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 06:57 PM Sep 2012

Shell criticised for limited testing of Alaska drilling containment equipment

Source: The Guardian

Shell has been accused of "stock-car racing recklessness" after apparently undertaking only the most limited testing of a key piece of equipment aimed at preventing a Gulf of Mexico-style blowout during its controversial drilling in the Arctic.

Documents obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request suggest field-testing of a containment dome took place over two hours on 25 and 26 June. The dome, known as a "capping stack", would be dropped over any stricken wellhead.

Two officials from the bureau of safety and environmental enforcement (BSSE) – an arm of the US interior department – were present with Shell officials at the tests in Puget Sound, Alaska, but there was no independent verification of the tests.

Shell reportedly started work yesterday on the $4.5bn (£2.8bn) drilling programme in the Chukchi Sea, 70 miles off Alaska's north-west coast. It does not yet have permission to drill into oil reserves.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/sep/09/shell-criticised-limited-testing-alaska-drilling-containment

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shell criticised for limited testing of Alaska drilling containment equipment (Original Post) alp227 Sep 2012 OP
Either they dont care, dont learn, or KNOW they cannot be held acountable benld74 Sep 2012 #1
It is astonishing that there has been so little discussin about this, or is it? Samantha Sep 2012 #2
Fairly normal... rwsanders Sep 2012 #3

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
2. It is astonishing that there has been so little discussin about this, or is it?
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:38 AM
Sep 2012

sometimes the wedge issue divides are cranked up just to obscure some controversial things in the background. And this could be one of those times.

Sam

rwsanders

(2,598 posts)
3. Fairly normal...
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:22 AM
Sep 2012

If you look at the regulations for oil spill response equipment for vessels and facilities it doesn't take much common sense to see the major flaws. They are allowed an hour for initial response even in areas where the current runs 3+ knots. By the time they can deploy the equipment a huge slug of oil is already gone (I've watched these exercises).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Shell criticised for limi...