Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' lawsuit against Trump over hush money agreement
Source: CNN.com
(CNN)A lawsuit by adult film star Stormy Daniels against President Donald Trump over a non-disparagement agreement has been tossed out of federal court.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/07/politics/stormy-daniels-trump-hush-money/index.html
By dismissing the case, the judge essentially gave Daniels what she wanted all along -- to be able to tell her story without the fear of being sued for millions of dollars, Avenatti said.
If that's the case, can Stormy make a parody porn movies about her affair with tRump? Maybe she could get Alec Baldwin to play the part of tRump? She could get that Mario character (Toad) to play his member...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2565 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' lawsuit against Trump over hush money agreement (Original Post)
PeeJ52
Mar 2019
OP
The judge found that it wasn't a Federal case and returned it to the LA Superior court...
PoliticAverse
Mar 2019
#1
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)1. The judge found that it wasn't a Federal case and returned it to the LA Superior court...
where it will go no further - "Defendants have given Plaintiff exactly what she asked for in the FAC'.
"The Court therefore REMANDS this case to Los Angeles Superior Court."
In this context, "remand" means that this Court divests itself of jurisdiction and returns this case to the Los Angeles Superior Court, where Plaintiff first filed the lawsuit. (See ECFNo. 1.) This does not mean that the litigation continues in state court. The procedural step of "remand" is necessary because Defendants removed this case to this Court from the Los Angeles Superior Court. See Polo v. Innoventions Int'l, LLC, 833 F.3d 1193, 1196(9th Cir. 2016).
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250.109.0_1.pdf
More DU discussion on the case here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=11897667
Squinch
(52,011 posts)2. Also, this isn't the main lawsuit to get rid of the nondisclosure.
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)3. So no porn movie yet?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)4. There isn't enough Stormy Daniels' porn already? n/t