Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Apr 2, 2019, 11:18 AM Apr 2019

Pelosi: No vote on new NAFTA until Mexico changes labor laws

Source: Politico



By SABRINA RODRIGUEZ 04/02/2019 10:04 AM EDT

Speaker Nancy Pelosi indicated on Tuesday the House will not consider President Donald Trump’s new North American trade pact until after Mexico has passed and implemented its major labor law reforms.

In an interview with POLITICO Playbook, the California Democrat explained that Mexico must pass labor law reforms required under the replacement deal for NAFTA — and she wants to see the implementation before the House considers backing the new deal, a top Trump administration legislative priority.

“Unless you do this, we can’t even consider it. ... We have to see that [Mexico passes] the legislation, that they have the factors in place that will make sure it’s implemented and they demonstrate some commitments in sincerity, because it’s a big issue how workers are treated in Mexico,” she said.

Pelosi’s comments are her clearest indication yet the deal will not face a quick vote in Congress, despite the Trump administration’s desire to get it passed by summer. In recent months, the administration has been increasing its efforts to get the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement passed ahead of the 2020 elections.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/02/pelosi-new-nafta-mexico-1311482

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pelosi: No vote on new NAFTA until Mexico changes labor laws (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2019 OP
Way to go Nancy. nt iluvtennis Apr 2019 #1
Well if someone is considering BumRushDaShow Apr 2019 #2
I support the concept, but how about some consideration to environmental protection also?????? rwsanders Apr 2019 #3
How about no vote on it until the sections requiring Mexico and Canada to treat big Pharma sinkingfeeling Apr 2019 #4
Fantastic. Thanks, Madame Speaker. rec, nt Mc Mike Apr 2019 #5
Do they even have to vote on it? My understanding is that it's the same treaty Guy Whitey Corngood Apr 2019 #6

BumRushDaShow

(128,917 posts)
2. Well if someone is considering
Tue Apr 2, 2019, 12:32 PM
Apr 2019

closing the entire southern border, then I would suppose the "Mexico" part of the "new NAFTA" would be irrelevant because all trade would stop.

rwsanders

(2,598 posts)
3. I support the concept, but how about some consideration to environmental protection also??????
Tue Apr 2, 2019, 01:50 PM
Apr 2019

There are still only a few vaquita left and Mexico just decided to allow fishermen back into their refuge.

sinkingfeeling

(51,454 posts)
4. How about no vote on it until the sections requiring Mexico and Canada to treat big Pharma
Tue Apr 2, 2019, 03:03 PM
Apr 2019

the same as the US does? The revised NAFTA text requires them to provide pharmaceutical corporations with monopoly powers to block generic competition. They would be granted the same 10 year monopoly protections to prevent competition.

Public Citizen is fighting this and Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on trade, is aware of this.

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,500 posts)
6. Do they even have to vote on it? My understanding is that it's the same treaty
Tue Apr 2, 2019, 05:37 PM
Apr 2019

with a different name. NAFTAT, the second 'T' is for 'Tremendous'.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pelosi: No vote on new NA...