Appeals court turns down Manning appeal over contempt in WikiLeaks probe
Source: Politico
A federal appeals court has turned down former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Mannings bid to overturn a contempt order that led to her jailing for refusing to answer questions from a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks.
Mannings lawyers said a district court judge ignored her claims that she was subjected to illegal electronic surveillance following her conviction by a court martial in 2013 of leaking hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and military reports to WikiLeaks.
However, in a brief, two-page order Monday, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals said it had no quibble with U.S. District Court Judge Claude Hiltons decision last month to find Manning in contempt and send her to a jail in Alexandria, Virginia, after she refused to answer a series of questions in the ongoing probe of WikiLeaks.
Upon consideration of the memorandum briefs filed on appeal and the record of proceedings in the district court, the court finds no error in the district courts rulings and affirms its finding of civil contempt. The court also denies appellants motion for release on bail, the appeals courts order said.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/22/chelsea-manning-appeal-wikileaks-probe-1284348
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)...(in which case she could claim 5A), no reason for her not to testify.
comradebillyboy
(10,144 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)you claim to care about "transparency in government"? Well this is your test...
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Mannings lawyers said a district court judge ignored her claims that she was subjected to illegal electronic surveillance following her conviction by a court martial in 2013...
Which has what to do with her refusal to comply with a grand jury subpoena?
lefty2000
(177 posts)I think it is time to lay off Chelsea Manning.