Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2019, 09:50 AM Apr 2019

Appeals court turns down Manning appeal over contempt in WikiLeaks probe

Source: Politico

A federal appeals court has turned down former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning’s bid to overturn a contempt order that led to her jailing for refusing to answer questions from a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks.

Manning’s lawyers said a district court judge ignored her claims that she was subjected to illegal electronic surveillance following her conviction by a court martial in 2013 of leaking hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and military reports to WikiLeaks.

However, in a brief, two-page order Monday, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals said it had no quibble with U.S. District Court Judge Claude Hilton’s decision last month to find Manning in contempt and send her to a jail in Alexandria, Virginia, after she refused to answer a series of questions in the ongoing probe of WikiLeaks.

“Upon consideration of the memorandum briefs filed on appeal and the record of proceedings in the district court, the court finds no error in the district court’s rulings and affirms its finding of civil contempt. The court also denies appellant’s motion for release on bail,” the appeals court’s order said.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/22/chelsea-manning-appeal-wikileaks-probe-1284348

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court turns down Manning appeal over contempt in WikiLeaks probe (Original Post) brooklynite Apr 2019 OP
Unless she's claiming legal jeopardy for testifying... brooklynite Apr 2019 #1
Laws shouldn't apply to special people like Chelsea comradebillyboy Apr 2019 #2
Quit being a coward Chelsea and spill your guts already Blue_Tires Apr 2019 #3
This bit is amusing.... jberryhill Apr 2019 #4
Enough is Enough lefty2000 Apr 2019 #5

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
1. Unless she's claiming legal jeopardy for testifying...
Mon Apr 22, 2019, 09:52 AM
Apr 2019

...(in which case she could claim 5A), no reason for her not to testify.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
3. Quit being a coward Chelsea and spill your guts already
Mon Apr 22, 2019, 10:08 AM
Apr 2019

you claim to care about "transparency in government"? Well this is your test...

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. This bit is amusing....
Mon Apr 22, 2019, 10:13 AM
Apr 2019

“Manning’s lawyers said a district court judge ignored her claims that she was subjected to illegal electronic surveillance following her conviction by a court martial in 2013...”

Which has what to do with her refusal to comply with a grand jury subpoena?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court turns down ...