Mueller wins again with appeals court ruling against Stone associate
Last edited Mon Apr 29, 2019, 07:42 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Politico
Special counsel Robert Mueller notched yet another legal victory on Monday even though his Russia investigation is over, as a federal appeals court rejected a bid to reexamine a lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of his appointment.
In a one-sentence order, a three-judge panel from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals turned back a request for a rehearing of a case it decided in February arguing that Mueller should have been nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Separately, the D.C. Circuit on Monday also denied a petition for a rehearing before the full court.
At issue is a case challenging Muellers authority brought by Andrew Miller, who refused to testify before a federal grand jury under subpoena about his former employer, the longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone.
Millers attorneys moved to quash the subpoena by citing alleged flaws in Muellers appointment but lost in a unanimous opinion that found no flaw in Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosensteins May 2017 decision to put the special counsel on the job investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/29/robert-mueller-roger-stone-associate-court-ruling-1292498
This is about Andrew Miller trying to fight his subpoena in the Roger Stone case.
I wonder what he's trying to hide.
elleng
(130,895 posts)the constitutionality of his appointment.'
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)iluvtennis
(19,852 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)I think this was a test case lawsuit for Stone, a probably others, to get out from under the SCO investigation.
Kind of doubt Miller's GJ appearance and testimony are of big importance, but the SCO could not allow him to set precedent of ignoring or fighting the subpoena.
Jumpty
(15 posts)Stove and his associates often file frivolous claims that are always rejected by the judge.