Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,204 posts)
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 03:10 PM Jun 2019

Trump Administration Seeking To Overhaul Forest Management Rules

Source: npr.org






June 12, 201912:30 PM ET

A logger cuts a large fir tree in the Umpqua National Forest near Oakridge, Ore. Federal land managers are proposing a sweeping rule change that could expand commercial logging on Forest Service land.
Don Ryan/AP



Federal land managers on Wednesday will propose sweeping rule changes to a landmark environmental law that would allow them to fast-track certain forest management projects, including logging and prescribed burning.

The U.S. Forest Service, under Chief Vicki Christiansen, is proposing revisions to the National Environmental Policy Act that could limit environmental review and public input on projects ranging from forest health and wildfire mitigation to infrastructure upgrades to commercial logging on federal land.

"We do more analysis than we need, we take more time than we need and we slow down important work to protect communities," Christiansen told NPR.

The proposed rule changes include an expansion of "categorical exclusions." These are often billed as tools that give land managers the discretion to bypass full-blown environmental studies in places where they can demonstrate there would be no severe impacts or degradation to the land.

..........................................
According to the government's own analysis — the last done in 2010 during the Obama administration — fewer than one-fifth of all timber and forest projects are appealed by citizens or environmental groups though. A bigger holdup is budget cuts, particularly in the Forest Service, where money has been diverted away from wildlife, habitat and forestry programs to pay for the skyrocketing costs of wildfire suppression........................................

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2019/06/12/731713229/trump-administration-seeking-to-overhaul-forest-management-rules



I simply do not trust any changes the Trump Admin. makes.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Administration Seeking To Overhaul Forest Management Rules (Original Post) riversedge Jun 2019 OP
How much money for rakes? keithbvadu2 Jun 2019 #1
The proof is in the details of any plan, pazzyanne Jun 2019 #2
It is part of a scam to open Federal land to mining, oil and gas extraction. Ford_Prefect Jun 2019 #3
Well said Bayard Jun 2019 #5
You can bet its about money..not conservation of natural resources... Maxheader Jun 2019 #4
Perhaps the biggest reason I am most thankful Blackjackdavey Jun 2019 #6

pazzyanne

(6,551 posts)
2. The proof is in the details of any plan,
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 04:55 PM
Jun 2019

and we know that the tRump administration is a "little" shy on details in everything they do. Also, where does the money go from these fast track cutting plans? We need to see the plan WRITTEN DOWN IN DETAIL!

Ford_Prefect

(7,895 posts)
3. It is part of a scam to open Federal land to mining, oil and gas extraction.
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 06:28 PM
Jun 2019

The analysis they want to simplify usually shows environmental and community impacts that would preclude the extraction activities. In Montana, the same interests proposed regulations that would have increased lumbering activities and generated a very short term increase in lumber-related jobs and income by removing protections for research and wildlife study areas. The proposed harvesting activity would lead to the decimation of the outdoor recreation industry in Montana at the cost of 30 times the value of the short term profits from logging.

But the GOP likes a story so they tell one about how the regulations killed the logging and took jobs from all those unemployed loggers. The industry has moved on since the 1980s. There are several hundred times that number of jobs in outdoor Montana now which derive from the presence of the forests and wildlife.

The extraction industries want to mine in areas they've been kept out of. Areas they claim hold mineral wealth beyond counting. They don't want federal rules telling them they must not pollute rivers and streams with chemical waste or runoff or tailings as do the oil and gas industry. They also want to do this on Federal land because the rates paid for the minerals extracted are pennies to the ton.

Removing or simplifying the regulatory review process by bypasses the environmental law intended to protect those lands. Once again the GOP redefines ketchup as a vegetable to get around pesky regulations.

Bayard

(22,063 posts)
5. Well said
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 12:43 AM
Jun 2019

By all means, let's short-cut all that environmental and public input stuff. I'm sure they'll replant all the trees, right?

Blackjackdavey

(178 posts)
6. Perhaps the biggest reason I am most thankful
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 12:34 PM
Jun 2019

for residing in New York State. Our state lands are out of reach and remain just about the only place in the lower 48 where you can still get 360 degree views without clear cuts in sight.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Administration Seek...